10 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Interest of DMBgreen2 sentences2009In In re Interest of D.M.B., the Supreme Court explained that when a juvenile court does not have jurisdiction, it has "no power ... to order a parent to comply with a rehabilitation plan, nor does the juvenile court have any power over the parent or child at the disposition hearing unless jurisdiction is alleged and proven by new facts at a new adjudication-disposition hearing." 240 Neb. at 352 , 481 N.W.2d at 909 . 2009In In re Interest of D.M.B., the Supreme Court explained that when a juvenile court does not have jurisdiction, it has "no power ... to order a parent to comply with a rehabilitation plan, nor does the juvenile court have any power over the parent or child at the disposition hearing unless jurisdiction is alleged and proven by new facts at a new adjudication-disposition hearing." 240 Neb. at 352 , 481 N.W.2d at 909 . | 5 | 9 |
In Re Interest of NMgreen2 sentences1998In holding that the juvenile court had no jurisdiction over the juvenile, the court quoted In re Interest of D.M.B., 240 Neb. 349 , 481 N.W.2d 905 (1992), for the following proposition: “If the pleadings and evidence at the adjudication hearing do not justify a juvenile court acquiring jurisdiction of a child, then the juvenile court has no jurisdiction, i.e., no power, to order a parent to comply with a rehabilitation plan, nor does the juvenile court have any power over the parent or child at the disposition hearing unless jurisdiction is alleged and proven by new facts at a new adjudication 1998In holding that the juvenile court had no jurisdiction over the juvenile, the court quoted In re Interest of D.M.B., 240 Neb. 349 , 481 N.W.2d 905 (1992), for the following proposition: “If the pleadings and evidence at the adjudication hearing do not justify a juvenile court acquiring jurisdiction of a child, then the juvenile court has no jurisdiction, i.e., no power, to order a parent to comply with a rehabilitation plan, nor does the juvenile court have any power over the parent or child at the disposition hearing unless jurisdiction is alleged and proven by new facts at a new adjudication | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Interest of Constance G.
neutral
1 sentence2002In re Interest of Constance G., 3 Neb. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
In Re Interest of CW
neutral
2 sentences1994W. et al., 238 Neb. 215 , 469 N.W.2d 535 (1991). *261 However, [i]f the pleadings and the evidence at the adjudication hearing do not justify a juvenile court’s acquiring jurisdiction of a child, then the juvenile court has no jurisdiction, i.e., no power, to order a parent to comply with a rehabilitation plan, nor does the juvenile court have any power over the párent or child at the disposition hearing unless jurisdiction is alleged and proven by new facts at a new adjudication-disposition hearing. 1994W. et al., 238 Neb. 215 , 469 N.W.2d 535 (1991). *261 However, [i]f the pleadings and the evidence at the adjudication hearing do not justify a juvenile court’s acquiring jurisdiction of a child, then the juvenile court has no jurisdiction, i.e., no power, to order a parent to comply with a rehabilitation plan, nor does the juvenile court have any power over the párent or child at the disposition hearing unless jurisdiction is alleged and proven by new facts at a new adjudication-disposition hearing. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.