10 New York opinions name it 1 courts 1986–2003 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Andersongreen2 sentences2003The totality of the circumstances supports the hearing court’s finding that defendant’s videotaped statements were voluntarily made (see Arizona v Fulminante, 499 US 279, 285-288 [1991]; People v Anderson, 42 NY2d 35, 38-39 [1977]). 2003The totality of the circumstances supports the hearing court’s finding that defendant’s statements were voluntarily made (see Arizona v Fulminante, 499 US 279, 285-288 [1991]; People v Anderson, 42 NY2d 35, 38-39 [1977]). | 2 | 7 |
Arizona v. Fulminantegreen2 sentences2003The totality of the circumstances supports the hearing court’s finding that defendant’s videotaped statements were voluntarily made (see Arizona v Fulminante, 499 US 279, 285-288 [1991]; People v Anderson, 42 NY2d 35, 38-39 [1977]). 2003The totality of the circumstances supports the hearing court’s finding that defendant’s statements were voluntarily made (see Arizona v Fulminante, 499 US 279, 285-288 [1991]; People v Anderson, 42 NY2d 35, 38-39 [1977]). | 2 | 3 |
People v. Tarsiagreen1 sentence2003The court properly determined that the police did not make any promises to defendant to induce his confession, and that their use of deceptive statements did not render the statement inadmissible (see People v Tarsia, 50 NY2d 1, 11 [1980]; People v Stokes, 233 AD2d 194 [1996], lv denied 89 NY2d 1101 [1997]). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Ramosgreen1 sentence2003The delay in defendant’s arraignment was not excessive and did not render the confession involuntary (see People v Ramos, 99 NY2d 27, 35 [2002]). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Salamangreen1 sentence1995Accordingly, the totality of the circumstances supports the hearing court’s conclusion that the minimally intrusive conduct of the officer was reasonable and lawful (see, e.g., People v Rich, 206 AD2d 443 ; People v Nelson, 179 AD2d 784 ; People v Watson, 96 AD2d 1066 ; People v Jenkins, 87 AD2d 526 ; see generally, People v Salaman, 71 NY2d 869 ; People v Davis, 166 AD2d 604 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Clewis v. Texas
green
2 sentences1999The totality of the circumstances supports the hearing court’s determination that the defendant’s statements and confession were voluntarily made and not the product of improper influence (Clewis v Texas, 386 US 707 ; People v Anderson, 42 NY2d 35 ). 1999The totality of the circumstances supports the hearing court’s determination that the defendant’s statements and confession were voluntarily made and not the product of improper influence (Clewis v Texas, 386 US 707 ; People v Anderson, 42 NY2d 35 ). | 2 | 1999–1999 |
People v. Norris
green
2 sentences1989Although three of the other men did not have beards, the totality of the circumstances supports the hearing court’s finding that the lineup was not unduly suggestive (see, People v Rodriguez, 124 AD2d 611 ; People v Johnson, 122 AD2d 812 ; People v Norris, 122 AD2d 82 ). 1986Although the attorney inadvertently placed into the defendant’s lineup two of the stand-ins from his codefendant’s lineup which the complainant had just viewed, in effect converting a five-man lineup into a three-man lineup, the totality of the circumstances supports the hearing court’s finding of no undue suggestiveness (see, People v Norris, 122 AD2d 82 ; People v Wright, 112 AD2d 179 ). | 2 | 1986–1989 |
Brewster v. Prince Apartments, Inc.
neutral
1 sentence2003The court properly determined that the police did not make any promises to defendant to induce his confession, and that their use of deceptive statements did not render the statement inadmissible (see People v Tarsia, 50 NY2d 1, 11 [1980]; People v Stokes, 233 AD2d 194 [1996], lv denied 89 NY2d 1101 [1997]). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
People v. Hopkins
green
1 sentence2001The totality of the circumstances supports the hearing court’s determination that defendant’s oral and written statements were voluntarily made (see, People v Hopkins, 58 NY2d 1079 ; People v Anderson, 42 NY2d 35 ). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Florea v. Bank of New York
neutral
1 sentence1995Accordingly, the totality of the circumstances supports the hearing court’s conclusion that the minimally intrusive conduct of the officer was reasonable and lawful (see, e.g., People v Rich, 206 AD2d 443 ; People v Nelson, 179 AD2d 784 ; People v Watson, 96 AD2d 1066 ; People v Jenkins, 87 AD2d 526 ; see generally, People v Salaman, 71 NY2d 869 ; People v Davis, 166 AD2d 604 ). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
People v. Watson
green
1 sentence1995Accordingly, the totality of the circumstances supports the hearing court’s conclusion that the minimally intrusive conduct of the officer was reasonable and lawful (see, e.g., People v Rich, 206 AD2d 443 ; People v Nelson, 179 AD2d 784 ; People v Watson, 96 AD2d 1066 ; People v Jenkins, 87 AD2d 526 ; see generally, People v Salaman, 71 NY2d 869 ; People v Davis, 166 AD2d 604 ). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
People v. Davis
green
1 sentence1995Accordingly, the totality of the circumstances supports the hearing court’s conclusion that the minimally intrusive conduct of the officer was reasonable and lawful (see, e.g., People v Rich, 206 AD2d 443 ; People v Nelson, 179 AD2d 784 ; People v Watson, 96 AD2d 1066 ; People v Jenkins, 87 AD2d 526 ; see generally, People v Salaman, 71 NY2d 869 ; People v Davis, 166 AD2d 604 ). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
People v. Nelson
green
1 sentence1995Accordingly, the totality of the circumstances supports the hearing court’s conclusion that the minimally intrusive conduct of the officer was reasonable and lawful (see, e.g., People v Rich, 206 AD2d 443 ; People v Nelson, 179 AD2d 784 ; People v Watson, 96 AD2d 1066 ; People v Jenkins, 87 AD2d 526 ; see generally, People v Salaman, 71 NY2d 869 ; People v Davis, 166 AD2d 604 ). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
People v. Rich
neutral
1 sentence1995Accordingly, the totality of the circumstances supports the hearing court’s conclusion that the minimally intrusive conduct of the officer was reasonable and lawful (see, e.g., People v Rich, 206 AD2d 443 ; People v Nelson, 179 AD2d 784 ; People v Watson, 96 AD2d 1066 ; People v Jenkins, 87 AD2d 526 ; see generally, People v Salaman, 71 NY2d 869 ; People v Davis, 166 AD2d 604 ). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
People v. Brockington
neutral
1 sentence1989In any event, any possible suggestiveness did not render the identification testimony of the complaining witness unreliable, since she clearly had a strong independent source upon which to make her in-court identification (see, People v Ballott, 20 NY2d 600 ; People v Callace, 143 AD2d 1027 ; People v Washington, 111 AD2d 418 ; People v Camacho, 110 AD2d 844 ). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
People v. Washington
neutral
1 sentence1989In any event, any possible suggestiveness did not render the identification testimony of the complaining witness unreliable, since she clearly had a strong independent source upon which to make her in-court identification (see, People v Ballott, 20 NY2d 600 ; People v Callace, 143 AD2d 1027 ; People v Washington, 111 AD2d 418 ; People v Camacho, 110 AD2d 844 ). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
People v. Johnson
green
1 sentence1989Although three of the other men did not have beards, the totality of the circumstances supports the hearing court’s finding that the lineup was not unduly suggestive (see, People v Rodriguez, 124 AD2d 611 ; People v Johnson, 122 AD2d 812 ; People v Norris, 122 AD2d 82 ). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
People v. Rodriguez
green
1 sentence1989Although three of the other men did not have beards, the totality of the circumstances supports the hearing court’s finding that the lineup was not unduly suggestive (see, People v Rodriguez, 124 AD2d 611 ; People v Johnson, 122 AD2d 812 ; People v Norris, 122 AD2d 82 ). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
People v. Callace
neutral
1 sentence1989In any event, any possible suggestiveness did not render the identification testimony of the complaining witness unreliable, since she clearly had a strong independent source upon which to make her in-court identification (see, People v Ballott, 20 NY2d 600 ; People v Callace, 143 AD2d 1027 ; People v Washington, 111 AD2d 418 ; People v Camacho, 110 AD2d 844 ). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
People v. Ballott
green
1 sentence1989In any event, any possible suggestiveness did not render the identification testimony of the complaining witness unreliable, since she clearly had a strong independent source upon which to make her in-court identification (see, People v Ballott, 20 NY2d 600 ; People v Callace, 143 AD2d 1027 ; People v Washington, 111 AD2d 418 ; People v Camacho, 110 AD2d 844 ). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
People v. Wright
neutral
1 sentence1986Although the attorney inadvertently placed into the defendant’s lineup two of the stand-ins from his codefendant’s lineup which the complainant had just viewed, in effect converting a five-man lineup into a three-man lineup, the totality of the circumstances supports the hearing court’s finding of no undue suggestiveness (see, People v Norris, 122 AD2d 82 ; People v Wright, 112 AD2d 179 ). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
People v. Lloyd Winston G.
green
1 sentence1986In any case, the complainant had a sufficient opportunity to observe the defendant during the crime and her in-court identification was, therefore, admissible (see, People v Lloyd Winston G., 45 NY2d 962, 964 ). | 1 | 1986–1986 |