9 Arkansas opinions name it 3 courts 1998–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hicks v. Cookgreen1 sentence2018See Hicks v. Cook , 103 Ark. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ark. Dep't of Fin. & Admin. v. Naturalis Health, LLC
green
1 sentence2021Instead, DHS rested its argument solely on Naturalis Health, 2018 Ark. 224 , 549 S.W.3d 901 , a case in which the Arkansas Supreme Court distinguished between “application” and “applicability” in interpreting Arkansas’s declaratory-judgment statute. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Sims v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.
neutral
1 sentence2015This motion was filed at the same time as the petition for termination, and DHS argued that it was in the children’s best interest that visitation be suspended because Sims 8 Cite as 2015 Ark. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Arkansas Department of Human Services v. Fort Smith School District
green
1 sentence2015The rule was implemented pursuant to Act 778 of 2009, codified Cite as 2015 Ark. 81 at Arkansas Code Annotated section 20-78-227 (Repl. 2014) and titled “Liability insurance and driver training requirements.” Act of Apr. 3, 2009, No. 778, 2009 Ark. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Sawyer v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.
neutral
1 sentence2014Cite as 2014 Ark. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Gaskill v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.
neutral
1 sentence2013In a permanency-planning order entered January 9, 2013, the trial court again noted that Gaskill had made progress, but she lacked transportation, had not stopped smoking, and continued to associate with “questionable men.” The trial court warned Gaskill that she had 2 Gaskill tested positive for THC when E.L. was born, but DHS’s case was later closed on this matter for unknown reasons. 2 Cite as 2013 Ark. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Coleman v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs
neutral
1 sentence2013The order stated that there was little likelihood that services to the family would result in 4 She failed to (1) maintain contact with DHS; (2) visit regularly with the children (last visit was on April 16, 2012); (3) submit to drug-and-alcohol assessment, and missed four scheduled appointments; (4) submit to a psychological evaluation; (5) remain drug free (tested positive for THC on March 26, 2012, and tested positive for THC and cocaine on April 12 and 16); (6) obtain and maintain stable, suitable housing. 5 Appellant was not present at that hearing, but her counsel was. 2 Cite as 2013 Ark | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Robinson v. Langdon
green
1 sentence1998The Arkansas Supreme Court in Robinson determined that the role of a DHS hearing officer met the test for judicial immunity which, in part, requires assurance that the hearing officer can perform his or her functions independently. 333 Ark. at 670 . | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Fitzhugh v. State
green
2 sentences1998Fitzhugh v. State, 296 Ark. 137 , 752 S.W.2d 275 (1988). 1998Fitzhugh v. State, 296 Ark. 137 , 752 S.W.2d 275 (1988). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.