regulated monopoly principle in Colorado

9 Colorado opinions name it 1 courts 1966–2007 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

Case	Followed	Cited
Ephraim Freightways, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commissiongreen colo · 1963 · cited in 3 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1966–1994 2 sentences 1994Comm’n, 151 Colo. 596, 599 , 380 P.2d 228, 230 (1963). 1994Comm’n, 151 Colo. 596, 599 , 380 P.2d 228, 230 (1963).	2	3
Durango Transportation, Inc. v. Colorado Public Utilities Commissiongreen colo · 2005 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007 2 sentences 2007See Durango Transp., 122 P.3d at 247-48 ; see also Boulder Airporter, Inc. v. Rocky Mountain Shuttlines, Inc., 918 P.2d 1118, 1121 (Colo.1996) (holding that "before making a finding of public convenience and necessity, the PUC must determine that the existing service is substantially inadequate"). 2007Accordingly, section 40-83-1012), C.R.S. (2006) provides that "[elvery public utility shall furnish, provide, and maintain such service, instrumentalities, equipment, and facilities as shall promote the safety, health, comfort, and convenience of its patrons, employees, and the public, and as shall in all respects be adequate, efficient, just, and reasonable." See also Durango Transp., 122 P.3d at 247-48 (deseribing the doctrine of regulated monopoly, under which the PUC may issue a CPCN to an applicant upon finding that the existing utility service is substantially inadequate and the public c	1	1
Boulder Airporter, Inc. v. Rocky Mountain Shuttlines, Inc.green colo · 1996 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007 1 sentence 2007See Durango Transp., 122 P.3d at 247-48 ; see also Boulder Airporter, Inc. v. Rocky Mountain Shuttlines, Inc., 918 P.2d 1118, 1121 (Colo.1996) (holding that "before making a finding of public convenience and necessity, the PUC must determine that the existing service is substantially inadequate").	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

Case	Cited	Years
Miller Bros., Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission green colo · 1974 2 sentences 1994Comm’n, 185 Colo. 414 , 525 P.2d 443 (1974) (discussing the meaning of regulated competition and the adoption by the legislature of this exception, which is currently codified at § 40-10-105(2), 17 C.R.S. (1993)), motor vehicle passenger carriers such as those in this case are still governed by the doctrine of regulated monopoly. 6 . 1994Comm’n, 185 Colo. 414 , 525 P.2d 443 (1974) (discussing the meaning of regulated competition and the adoption by the legislature of this exception, which is currently codified at § 40-10-105(2), 17 C.R.S. (1993)), motor vehicle passenger carriers such as those in this case are still governed by the doctrine of regulated monopoly. 6 .	3	1975–1994
Public Utilities Commission v. Donahue green colo · 1959 2 sentences 1994Donahue, 138 Colo. at 498 , 335 P.2d at 288 . 1994Donahue, 138 Colo. at 498 , 335 P.2d at 288 .	2	1966–1994
Public Service Co. of Colorado v. Public Utilities Commission green colo · 1988 1 sentence 1999Co., 765 P.2d at 1021 (quoting Public Utils.	1	1999–1999
Public Utilities Commission v. Home Light & Power Co. green colo · 1967 2 sentences 1988Comm’n v. Home Light & Power Co., 163 Colo. 72 , 428 P.2d 928 (1967). 1988Comm’n v. Home Light & Power Co., 163 Colo. 72 , 428 P.2d 928 (1967).	1	1988–1988
Public Utilities Commission v. Stanton Transportation Co. green colo · 1963 2 sentences 1977An example is PUC v. Stanton Co., 153 Colo. 372 , 386 P.2d 590 (1963). 1977An example is PUC v. Stanton Co., 153 Colo. 372 , 386 P.2d 590 (1963).	1	1977–1977
Public Service Co. v. Public Utilities Commission green colo · 1960 2 sentences 1966Ephraim Freightways, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission, 151 Colo. 596 , 380 P.2d 228 ; Donohue v. Public Utilities Commission, 145 Colo. 499 , 359 P.2d 1024 ; Public Service Company v. Public Utilities Commission, 142 Colo. 135 , 350 P.2d 543 ; Public Utilities Commission of Colorado v. Donahue, 138 Colo. 492 , 335 P.2d 285 ; Public Utilities Commission v. City of Loveland, 87 Colo. 556 , 289 P. 1090 . 1966Ephraim Freightways, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission, 151 Colo. 596 , 380 P.2d 228 ; Donohue v. Public Utilities Commission, 145 Colo. 499 , 359 P.2d 1024 ; Public Service Company v. Public Utilities Commission, 142 Colo. 135 , 350 P.2d 543 ; Public Utilities Commission of Colorado v. Donahue, 138 Colo. 492 , 335 P.2d 285 ; Public Utilities Commission v. City of Loveland, 87 Colo. 556 , 289 P. 1090 .	1	1966–1966
Public Utilities Commission v. City of Loveland green colo · 1930 2 sentences 1966Ephraim Freightways, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission, 151 Colo. 596 , 380 P.2d 228 ; Donohue v. Public Utilities Commission, 145 Colo. 499 , 359 P.2d 1024 ; Public Service Company v. Public Utilities Commission, 142 Colo. 135 , 350 P.2d 543 ; Public Utilities Commission of Colorado v. Donahue, 138 Colo. 492 , 335 P.2d 285 ; Public Utilities Commission v. City of Loveland, 87 Colo. 556 , 289 P. 1090 . 1966Ephraim Freightways, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission, 151 Colo. 596 , 380 P.2d 228 ; Donohue v. Public Utilities Commission, 145 Colo. 499 , 359 P.2d 1024 ; Public Service Company v. Public Utilities Commission, 142 Colo. 135 , 350 P.2d 543 ; Public Utilities Commission of Colorado v. Donahue, 138 Colo. 492 , 335 P.2d 285 ; Public Utilities Commission v. City of Loveland, 87 Colo. 556 , 289 P. 1090 .	1	1966–1966
Donahue v. Public Utilities Commission green colo · 1961 2 sentences 1966Ephraim Freightways, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission, 151 Colo. 596 , 380 P.2d 228 ; Donohue v. Public Utilities Commission, 145 Colo. 499 , 359 P.2d 1024 ; Public Service Company v. Public Utilities Commission, 142 Colo. 135 , 350 P.2d 543 ; Public Utilities Commission of Colorado v. Donahue, 138 Colo. 492 , 335 P.2d 285 ; Public Utilities Commission v. City of Loveland, 87 Colo. 556 , 289 P. 1090 . 1966Ephraim Freightways, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission, 151 Colo. 596 , 380 P.2d 228 ; Donohue v. Public Utilities Commission, 145 Colo. 499 , 359 P.2d 1024 ; Public Service Company v. Public Utilities Commission, 142 Colo. 135 , 350 P.2d 543 ; Public Utilities Commission of Colorado v. Donahue, 138 Colo. 492 , 335 P.2d 285 ; Public Utilities Commission v. City of Loveland, 87 Colo. 556 , 289 P. 1090 .	1	1966–1966

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CO § Colo. Rev. Stat. § 40-6-115 (5) CO § Colo. Rev. Stat. § 40-3-102 (3) CO § Colo. Rev. Stat. § 40-5-101 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check