record provided for reversible error in Arizona

69 Arizona opinions name it 1 courts 2014–2026 24 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Leongreen ariz · 1969 · cited in 59 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2014–2026 2 sentences 2014CONCLUSION ¶7 This court has read and considered counsel’s brief and has searched the record provided for reversible error and has found none. 3Absent material revisions after the relevant dates, statutes cited refer to the current version unless otherwise indicated. 3 STATE v. CHEE Decision of the Court Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300 , 451 P.2d at 881 ; Clark, 196 Ariz. at 537 ¶ 30, 2 P.3d at 96 . 2014CONCLUSION ¶7 This court has read and considered counsel’s brief and has searched the record provided for reversible error and has found none. 3Absent material revisions after the relevant dates, statutes cited refer to the current version unless otherwise indicated. 3 STATE v. CHEE Decision of the Court Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300 , 451 P.2d at 881 ; Clark, 196 Ariz. at 537 ¶ 30, 2 P.3d at 96 .	15	59
State v. Clarkgreen arizctapp · 1999 · cited in 64 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2014–2026 2 sentences 2014CONCLUSION ¶7 This court has read and considered counsel’s brief and has searched the record provided for reversible error and has found none. 3Absent material revisions after the relevant dates, statutes cited refer to the current version unless otherwise indicated. 3 STATE v. CHEE Decision of the Court Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300 , 451 P.2d at 881 ; Clark, 196 Ariz. at 537 ¶ 30, 2 P.3d at 96 . 2014CONCLUSION ¶7 This court has read and considered counsel’s brief and has searched the record provided for reversible error and has found none. 3Absent material revisions after the relevant dates, statutes cited refer to the current version unless otherwise indicated. 3 STATE v. CHEE Decision of the Court Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300 , 451 P.2d at 881 ; Clark, 196 Ariz. at 537 ¶ 30, 2 P.3d at 96 .	11	64
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JV-117258green arizctapp · 1989 · cited in 3 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2016–2020 2 sentences 2020See JV-117258, 163 Ariz. at 488 . 2016See JV-117258, 163 Ariz. at 488 .	3	3
State v. Spearsgreen ariz · 1996 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 2 sentences 2015See State v. Spears, 184 Ariz. 277, 287 , 908 P.2d 1062, 1072 (1996). 11 STATE v. BLACK Decision of the Court CONCLUSION ¶34 This court has read and considered counsel’s brief and Black’s pro se supplemental brief, and has searched the record provided for reversible error and has found none. 2015See State v. Spears, 184 Ariz. 277, 287 , 908 P.2d 1062, 1072 (1996). 11 STATE v. BLACK Decision of the Court CONCLUSION ¶34 This court has read and considered counsel’s brief and Black’s pro se supplemental brief, and has searched the record provided for reversible error and has found none.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Rhodes green ariz · 1969 1 sentence 2020Leon, 104 Ariz. at 300 ; Clark, 196 Ariz. at 537 ¶ 30.	1	2020–2020

Statutes the citing opinions construe

AZ § Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-120.21 (16) AZ § Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-105 (6) AZ § Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-703 (5) AZ § Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-712 (4) AZ § Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-116 (3) AZ § Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-701 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check