9 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1967–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
E & I, INC. v. Excavators, Inc.green2 sentences2016See E & I, Inc. v. Excavators, Inc., 697 So. 2d 545, 547 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (requiring the appellant to make error clear). 2016See E & I, Inc. v. Excavators, Inc., 697 So.2d 545, 547 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (requiring the appellant to make error clear). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gars v. Woodard
green
2 sentences1973Marks, supra; Hall v. Hall, Fla.App. 1961, 135 So.2d 432 ; Gars v. Woodard, Fla.App. 1968, 214 So.2d 385 . 1972Hall v. Hall, Fla.App.1961, 135 So.2d 432 ; Gars v. Woodward, Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 385 . | 2 | 1972–1973 |
Hall v. Hall
green
2 sentences1973Marks, supra; Hall v. Hall, Fla.App. 1961, 135 So.2d 432 ; Gars v. Woodard, Fla.App. 1968, 214 So.2d 385 . 1972Hall v. Hall, Fla.App.1961, 135 So.2d 432 ; Gars v. Woodward, Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 385 . | 2 | 1972–1973 |
Plymale v. State
green
2 sentences1968Coleman v. State, Fla.App.1967, 193 So.2d 699 ; Plymale v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 201 So.2d 85 ; Bryant v. State, supra. Unless there is no substantial evidence to support his conclusions, the trial judge will be affirmed. 1967See: Coleman v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 193 So.2d 699 ; Plymale v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 201 So.2d 85 . | 2 | 1967–1968 |
Coleman v. State
neutral
2 sentences1968Coleman v. State, Fla.App.1967, 193 So.2d 699 ; Plymale v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 201 So.2d 85 ; Bryant v. State, supra. Unless there is no substantial evidence to support his conclusions, the trial judge will be affirmed. 1967See: Coleman v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 193 So.2d 699 ; Plymale v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 201 So.2d 85 . | 2 | 1967–1968 |
Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
green
1 sentence1986Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1980); Lahr v. Lahr, 337 So.2d 837 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Storer v. Storer, 305 So.2d 212 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Storer v. Storer
green
1 sentence1986Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1980); Lahr v. Lahr, 337 So.2d 837 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Storer v. Storer, 305 So.2d 212 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Lahr v. Lahr
green
1 sentence1986Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1980); Lahr v. Lahr, 337 So.2d 837 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Storer v. Storer, 305 So.2d 212 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Bryant v. State
green
1 sentence1976Bryant v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 204 So.2d 9 . | 1 | 1976–1976 |
In re Estate of Hobein
green
1 sentence1973As was stated in In re Estate of Hobein, Fla.App. 1970, 238 So.2d 497 : * * * * * * "It is also fundamental that an order of a ... court rendered in the exercise of its lawful discretion is clothed with a presumption of correctness, and will be disturbed on appeal only upon a clear showing that it is contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence, the burden being on the appellant to make error clearly appear." * * * * * * Accordingly, the judgment appealed is affirmed. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Florida State Constructors Service, Inc. v. Hernandez
green
1 sentence1973Marks, supra; Hall v. Hall, Fla.App. 1961, 135 So.2d 432 ; Gars v. Woodard, Fla.App. 1968, 214 So.2d 385 . | 1 | 1973–1973 |