9 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwoodgreen2 sentences2021For these reasons, the - 14 - portion of Boyd’s claim pertaining to juror Striggles’s familial connection does not satisfy the requirement of Martin that the juror be shown to have failed “to answer honestly a material question on voir dire.” Martin, slip op. at 17 (quoting McDonough Power Equip., Inc., 464 U.S. at 556 ). 2015The United States Supreme Court has emphasized that “[t]he motives for concealing information may vary, but only those reasons that affect a juror’s impartiality can truly be said to affect the fairness of a trial.” McDonough [Power Equip., Inc. v. Greenwood], 464 U.S. [548], 556, 104 S.Ct. 845 [ 78 L.Ed.2d 663 (1984) ]; see also United States v. Carpa, 271 F.3d 962, 967 (11th Cir.2001) (citing McDonough, 464 U.S. at 553 , 104-S.Ct. 845). | 1 | 2 |
Diaz v. Stategreen1 sentence2021Martin, slip op. at 13-16 (citing Diaz v. State, 132 So. 3d 93, 104-05 (Fla. 2013), and Fla. R. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Kablitzgreen1 sentence2021See Hendrix v. State, 136 So. 3d 1122, 1124 (Fla. 2014) (concluding that a -9- successive postconviction motion may not be used to relitigate claims that were raised and rejected on direct appeal or in prior postconviction proceedings). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Carpagreen2 sentences2015The United States Supreme Court has emphasized that “[t]he motives for concealing information may vary, but only those reasons that affect a juror’s impartiality can truly be said to affect the fairness of a trial.” McDonough [Power Equip., Inc. v. Greenwood], 464 U.S. [548], 556, 104 S.Ct. 845 [ 78 L.Ed.2d 663 (1984) ]; see also United States v. Carpa, 271 F.3d 962, 967 (11th Cir.2001) (citing McDonough, 464 U.S. at 553 , 104-S.Ct. 845). 2015The United States Supreme Court has emphasized that “[t]he motives for concealing information may vary, but only those reasons that affect a juror’s impartiality can truly be said to affect the fairness of a trial.” McDonough Power Equip., Inc. v. Greenwood, 464 U.S. 548, 556 (1984); see also United States v. Carpa, 271 F.3d 962, 967 (11th Cir. 2001) (citing McDonough, 464 U.S. at 553 ). | 1 | 1 |
Savage v. Stategreen1 sentence2008See Savage v. State, 494 So.2d 274, 277 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (concluding that evidence that appellant "struggled or wrestled with the deputy" and "struck the deputy with a flashlight" supported both a conviction for resisting with violence and a conviction for battery on a law enforcement officer). | 1 | 1 |
Persad v. Stategreen1 sentence2005The trial court, which is “generally accorded broad discretion in deciding whether to grant a motion for new trial,” Persad v. State, 859 So.2d 535, 535-36 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), denied Boyd’s motion for an additur or, in the alternative, a new trial. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Boyd v. State
green
1 sentence2021Boyd I, 910 So. 2d at 178-79 . -6- After receiving a response to Boyd’s motion from the State, the postconviction court summarily denied the motion without explaining its ruling. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
United States v. Agurs
green
2 sentences2005This motion, at best, raised only the mere possibility that there could have been a print on the trash bag not belonging to Boyd or someone in Boyd's household, and "[t]he mere possibility that an item of undisclosed information might have helped the defense, or might have affected the outcome of the trial, does not establish `materiality' in the constitutional sense." United States v. *180 Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 109-10 , 96 S.Ct. 2392 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976). 2005This motion, at best, raised only the mere possibility that there could have been a print on the trash bag not belonging to Boyd or someone in Boyd's household, and "[t]he mere possibility that an item of undisclosed information might have helped the defense, or might have affected the outcome of the trial, does not establish `materiality' in the constitutional sense." United States v. *180 Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 109-10 , 96 S.Ct. 2392 , 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Smith v. State
green
1 sentence2004NOTES [1] We note that it is not clear from Mr. Boyd's motion that the trial judge in this case participated in negotiations or whether the judge was merely aware of negotiations that had occurred between counsel. [2] We are uncertain whether our decision conflicts with the Third District's recent decision in Smith v. State, 842 So.2d 1047 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Giles v. State
green
1 sentence2003We approve Boyd and disapprove Giles, 773 So.2d at 1167 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Boyd v. Florida Memorial College
neutral
1 sentence1989In Boyd, supra, the statute of limitations ran on Boyd’s claim while he was in prison. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Quality Shell Homes & Supply Company v. Roley
green
1 sentence1985On appeal of the deputy commissioner’s order, claimant has again raised the estop-pel argument and analogizes the instant case to Quality Shell Homes & Supply Company v. Roley, 186 So.2d 837 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.