9 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2008–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Horness
green
2 sentences2009Horness, 600 N.W.2d at 298 . 2009Horness, 600 N.W.2d at 298 . | 4 | 2008–2009 |
State v. Bearse
green
2 sentences2023“A successful ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim requires proof by a preponderance of the evidence that (1) counsel failed to perform an essential duty, and (2) prejudice resulted.” State v. Bearse, 748 N.W.2d 211 , 214–15 (Iowa 2008). 2015“A successful ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim requires proof by a preponderance of the evidence that (1) counsel failed to perform an essential duty, and (2) prejudice resulted.” Id. at 214-15 . | 3 | 2014–2023 |
State of Iowa v. Allen Bradley Clay
green
2 sentences2018Ineffective Assistance Baker next argues his counsel was ineffective for failing to file a motion to suppress in case number AGCR212970.5 A successful ineffective-assistance-of- counsel claim requires proving “(1) counsel failed to perform an essential duty; and (2) prejudice resulted.” Clay, 824 N.W.2d at 495 . 2018Prejudice resulted if, “but for the counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.” Id. at 496 . | 2 | 2015–2018 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.