9 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1970–2024 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cole v. Guygreen2 sentences2017See Cole v. Guy, 183 Ill. 2016See Cole v. Guy, 183 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Doe v. Catholic Bishop of Chicagogreen1 sentence2024See Doe v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago, 2017 IL App (1st) 162388, ¶ 14 (“the trial court may allow a claim for punitive damages if the evidence would reasonably support a finding that defendant acted ‘willfully, or with such gross negligence as to indicate a wanton disregard of the rights of others’ ” (quoting Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc., 74 Ill. 2d 172, 186 (1978), and citing Loitz v. Remington Arms Co., 138 Ill. 2d 404, 415 (1990))). | 1 | 1 |
Loitz v. Remington Arms Co., Inc.green1 sentence2024See Doe v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago, 2017 IL App (1st) 162388, ¶ 14 (“the trial court may allow a claim for punitive damages if the evidence would reasonably support a finding that defendant acted ‘willfully, or with such gross negligence as to indicate a wanton disregard of the rights of others’ ” (quoting Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc., 74 Ill. 2d 172, 186 (1978), and citing Loitz v. Remington Arms Co., 138 Ill. 2d 404, 415 (1990))). | 1 | 1 |
Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.green1 sentence2024See Doe v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago, 2017 IL App (1st) 162388, ¶ 14 (“the trial court may allow a claim for punitive damages if the evidence would reasonably support a finding that defendant acted ‘willfully, or with such gross negligence as to indicate a wanton disregard of the rights of others’ ” (quoting Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc., 74 Ill. 2d 172, 186 (1978), and citing Loitz v. Remington Arms Co., 138 Ill. 2d 404, 415 (1990))). | 1 | 1 |
City of Chicago v. City of Kankakeegreen1 sentence2024See City of Chicago v. City of Kankakee, 2019 IL 122878, ¶ 20 (noting that “whether the proposed amendment would cure the defective pleading” is a factor to consider in whether the circuit court abused its discretion in denying leave to amend). ¶ 48 Finally, with respect to the circuit court’s denial of plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration, plaintiffs’ appellate arguments never get off the ground. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Adams v. J. I. Case Co.
green
2 sentences1980App. 551, 557 , 90 N.E.2d 645 : “ ‘The alleged formal deficiencies of the complaint, urged by defendants, to the effect that numerous causes of action were pleaded in the same count in violation of the Civil Practice Act [citation], are without merit, inasmuch as the various breaches of duty alleged by plaintiff were based upon the same set of facts, and could be properly treated as a single cause of action, and set forth in the same count.’ ( 125 Ill. 1976The court in Adams quotes the Savoie case: “ ‘The alleged formal deficiencies of the complaint, urged by the defendants, to the effect that numerous causes of actions were pleaded in the same count in violation of the Civil Practice Act [citation], are without merit, inasmuch as the various breaches of duty alleged by plaintiff were based upon the same set of facts, and could be properly treated as a single cause of action, and set forth in the same count.’ ” 125 Ill. | 2 | 1976–1980 |
Savoie v. Town of Bourbonnais
green
2 sentences1980App. 551, 557 , 90 N.E.2d 645 : “ ‘The alleged formal deficiencies of the complaint, urged by defendants, to the effect that numerous causes of action were pleaded in the same count in violation of the Civil Practice Act [citation], are without merit, inasmuch as the various breaches of duty alleged by plaintiff were based upon the same set of facts, and could be properly treated as a single cause of action, and set forth in the same count.’ ( 125 Ill. 1970As stated in Savoie v. Town of Bourbonnais, 339 Ill App 551, 90 NE2d 645 : “The alleged formal deficiencies of the complaint, urged by defendants, to the effect that numerous causes of action were pleaded in the same count in violation of the Civil Practice Act (ch 110, par 157, § 33, subpar (2), Ill Rev Stats [Jones Ill Stats Ann 104.033, subpar (2)]), are without merit, inasmuch as the various breaches of duty alleged by plaintiff were based upon the same set of facts, and could be properly treated as a single cause of action, and set forth in the same count.” Duplicitous pleading, though no | 2 | 1970–1980 |
Scheinblum v. Schain Banks Kenny & Schwartz, Ltd.
green
1 sentence2023Certainly, with Judge Vega’s ruling on the motion to reconsider, Jones knew that Leving’s services had been unproductive, and, in that sense, excessive. *** Thus, Jones’ cause of action accrued no later than the date Judge Vega issued his ruling on the motion to reconsider, which was long after the fees were billed and long after Leving ceased representing and billing Jones. 2 The trial court noted this statute has been applied to a breach of fiduciary duty claim against an attorney, citing Scheinblum v. Schain Banks Kenny & Schwartz, Ltd., 2021 IL App (1st) 200798, ¶ 23 . -8- 1-21-1667 As a r | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.
green
1 sentence2022In subpart (a) of paragraph 72 in count I, the Findlays alleged that “[u]nder Illinois law, CTIC’s acceptance of a single count in defense of a [sic] alleged complaint requires coverage of all counts alleged against the Plaintiffs, as defendant.” ¶ 38 On November 20, 2018, the trial court entered an amended order making the following rulings: (1) subpart (a) of paragraph 72 in count I for breach of contract was dismissed without prejudice; the motion to dismiss was otherwise denied for the remainder of count I; (2) count II, which alleged that CTIC breached the title commitment and title insur | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Nepil v. Zeman
neutral
1 sentence1970As stated in Savoie v. Town of Bourbonnais, 339 Ill App 551, 90 NE2d 645 : “The alleged formal deficiencies of the complaint, urged by defendants, to the effect that numerous causes of action were pleaded in the same count in violation of the Civil Practice Act (ch 110, par 157, § 33, subpar (2), Ill Rev Stats [Jones Ill Stats Ann 104.033, subpar (2)]), are without merit, inasmuch as the various breaches of duty alleged by plaintiff were based upon the same set of facts, and could be properly treated as a single cause of action, and set forth in the same count.” Duplicitous pleading, though no | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.