9 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2012–2023 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Woods v. Illinois Department of Employment Securitygreen2 sentences2021To establish misconduct under section 602(A), the employer must show that: 5 “(1) there was a deliberate and willful violation of a rule or policy of the employing unit, (2) the rule or policy was reasonable, and (3) the violation either harmed the employer or was repeated by the employee despite a previous warning or other explicit instruction from the employing unit.” Woods, 2012 IL App (1st) 101639, ¶ 19 (citing 820 ILCS 405/602(A) (West 2008)). 2021To establish misconduct under section 602(A), the employer must show that: “(1) there was a deliberate and willful violation of a rule or policy of the employing unit, (2) the rule or policy was reasonable, and (3) the violation either harmed the employer or was repeated by the employee despite a previous warning or other explicit instruction from the employing unit.” Woods, 2012 IL App (1st) 101639, ¶ 19 (citing 820 ILCS 405/602(A) (West 2008)). | 4 | 5 |
Manning v. Department of Employment Securitygreen2 sentences2014"Misconduct can be premised on either a particular incident of a violation of an employer's rules that triggered the employee's discharge, or the employee's cumulative violations of the employer's rules taken as a whole." Alternative Staffing, Inc. v. Illinois Department of Employment Security, 2012 IL App (1st) 113332, ¶ 30 . ¶ 28 Under section 602(A), three elements must be proven to establish misconduct: "(1) there was a deliberate and willful violation of a rule or policy of the employing unit, (2) the rule or 10 No. 1-13-1813 policy was reasonable, and (3) the violation either harmed the 2012It must be proven that (1) there was a deliberate and willful violation of a rule or policy of the employing unit, (2) the rule or policy was reasonable, and (3) the violation either harmed the employer or was repeated by the employee despite a previous warning or other explicit instruction from the employing unit. 820 ILCS 405/602(A) (West 2008); Manning, 365 Ill. | 3 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Alternative Staffing, Inc. v. Illinois Department of Employment Security
green
2 sentences2014“Misconduct can be premised on either a particular incident of a violation of an employer’s rules that triggered the employee’s discharge, or the employee’s cumulative violations of the employer’s rules taken as a whole.” Alternative Staffing, Inc. v. Illinois Department of Employment Security, 2012 IL App (1st) 113332, ¶ 30 . ¶ 28 Under section 602(A), three elements must be proven to establish misconduct: “(1) there was a deliberate and willful violation of a rule or policy of the employing unit, (2) the rule or policy was reasonable, and (3) the violation either harmed the employer or was r 2014"Misconduct can be premised on either a particular incident of a violation of an employer's rules that triggered the employee's discharge, or the employee's cumulative violations of the employer's rules taken as a whole." Alternative Staffing, Inc. v. Illinois Department of Employment Security, 2012 IL App (1st) 113332, ¶ 30 . ¶ 28 Under section 602(A), three elements must be proven to establish misconduct: "(1) there was a deliberate and willful violation of a rule or policy of the employing unit, (2) the rule or 10 No. 1-13-1813 policy was reasonable, and (3) the violation either harmed the | 4 | 2014–2021 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.