9 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 2013–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Wardgreen2 sentences2021Under the nonconstitutional harmless error analysis, we must be convinced "there is no reasonable probability that the error will or did affect the outcome of the trial." Ward, 292 Kan. at 565 ; see K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 60-261. 2020Becker's challenge necessitates the application of the nonconstitutional harmless error test set forth in State v. Ward, 292 Kan. 541, 565 , 256 P.3d 801 (2011); see State v. Ross, 310 Kan. 216 , 223, 445 P.3d 726 (2019); Plummer, 295 Kan. at 168 . | 2 | 5 |
State v. McCulloughgreen2 sentences2020See State v. McCullough, 293 Kan. 970, 981 , 270 P.3d 1142 (2012). 2020See State v. McCullough, 293 Kan. 970, 981 , 270 P.3d 1142 (2012). | 1 | 1 |
Stewart v.Rossgreen1 sentence2020Becker's challenge necessitates the application of the nonconstitutional harmless error test set forth in State v. Ward, 292 Kan. 541, 565 , 256 P.3d 801 (2011); see State v. Ross, 310 Kan. 216 , 223, 445 P.3d 726 (2019); Plummer, 295 Kan. at 168 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Plummer
green
2 sentences2020Becker's challenge necessitates the application of the nonconstitutional harmless error test set forth in State v. Ward, 292 Kan. 541, 565 , 256 P.3d 801 (2011); see State v. Ross, 310 Kan. 216 , 223, 445 P.3d 726 (2019); Plummer, 295 Kan. at 168 . 2013We, therefore, apply the nonconstitutional harmless error standard under which “the error is reversible only if we determine that there is a ‘reasonable probability that the error will or did affect the outcome of the trial in light of the entire record.’ Ward, 292 Kan. at 569 .” Plummer, 295 Kan. at 168 . | 2 | 2013–2020 |
State v. Knapp
green
1 sentence2026State v. Knapp, 313 Kan. 824 , 827, 490 P.3d 1228 (2021). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Moyer
green
2 sentences2022State v. Moyer, 306 Kan. 342, 359 , 410 P.3d 71 (2017). 2022State v. Moyer, 306 Kan. 342, 359 , 410 P.3d 71 (2017). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Macomber
green
1 sentence2020E.g., State v. James, 309 Kan. 1280 , 1301-02, 443 P.3d 1063 (2019); State v. Macomber, 309 Kan. 907 , 921-23, 441 P.3d 479 (2019). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. James
green
1 sentence2020E.g., State v. James, 309 Kan. 1280 , 1301-02, 443 P.3d 1063 (2019); State v. Macomber, 309 Kan. 907 , 921-23, 441 P.3d 479 (2019). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.