Voyles test in Kansas

9 Kansas opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Trujillogreen kan · 2013 · cited in 6 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2013–2015 2 sentences 2015See State v. King, 297 Kan. 955, 979-80 , 305 P.3d 641 (2013); see also State v. Trujillo, 296 Kan. 625, 631 , 294 P.3d 281 (2013) (noting court’s decision to omit the ‘real possibility’ language from Voyles test to avoid confusion with the constitutional harmless error test).” Santos-Vega, 299 Kan. at 18 .’ State v. De La Torre, 300 Kan. 591, 596 , 331 P.3d 815 (2014).” State v. Castleberry, 301 Kan. 170, 185-86 , 339 P.3d 795 (2014). 2015See State v. King, 297 Kan. 955, 979-80 , 305 P.3d 641 (2013); see also State v. Trujillo, 296 Kan. 625, 631 , 294 P.3d 281 (2013) (noting court’s decision to omit the ‘real possibility’ language from Voyles test to avoid confusion with the constitutional harmless error test).” Santos-Vega, 299 Kan. at 18 .’ State v. De La Torre, 300 Kan. 591, 596 , 331 P.3d 815 (2014).” State v. Castleberry, 301 Kan. 170, 185-86 , 339 P.3d 795 (2014).	4	6
State v. Kinggreen kan · 2013 · cited in 4 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2014–2015 2 sentences 2015See State v. King, 297 Kan. 955, 979-80 , 305 P.3d 641 (2013); see also State v. Trujillo, 296 Kan. 625, 631 , 294 P.3d 281 (2013) (noting court’s decision to omit the ‘real possibility’ language from Voyles test to avoid confusion with the constitutional harmless error test).” Santos-Vega, 299 Kan. at 18 .’ State v. De La Torre, 300 Kan. 591, 596 , 331 P.3d 815 (2014).” State v. Castleberry, 301 Kan. 170, 185-86 , 339 P.3d 795 (2014). 2015See State v. King, 297 Kan. 955, 979-80 , 305 P.3d 641 (2013); see also State v. Trujillo, 296 Kan. 625, 631 , 294 P.3d 281 (2013) (noting court’s decision to omit the ‘real possibility’ language from Voyles test to avoid confusion with the constitutional harmless error test).” Santos-Vega, 299 Kan. at 18 .’ State v. De La Torre, 300 Kan. 591, 596 , 331 P.3d 815 (2014).” State v. Castleberry, 301 Kan. 170, 185-86 , 339 P.3d 795 (2014).	4	4
State v. Santos-Vegagreen kan · 2014 · cited in 3 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2014–2015 2 sentences 2015See State v. King, 297 Kan. 955, 979-80 , 305 P.3d 641 (2013); see also State v. Trujillo, 296 Kan. 625, 631 , 294 P.3d 281 (2013) (noting court’s decision to omit the ‘real possibility’ language from Voyles test to avoid confusion with the constitutional harmless error test).” Santos-Vega, 299 Kan. at 18 .’ State v. De La Torre, 300 Kan. 591, 596 , 331 P.3d 815 (2014).” State v. Castleberry, 301 Kan. 170, 185-86 , 339 P.3d 795 (2014). 2014See State v. King, 297 Kan. 955, 979-80 , 305 P.3d 641 (2013); see also State v. Trujillo, 296 Kan. 625, 631 , 294 P.3d 281 (2013) (noting court’s decision to omit the “real possibility” language from Voyles test to avoid confusion with the constitutional harmless error test).’ Santos-Vega, 299 Kan. at 18 .” State v. De La Torre, 300 Kan. 591, 596 , 331 P.3d 815 , (2014).	3	3
State v. De La Torregreen kan · 2014 · cited in 2 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2014–2015 2 sentences 2015See State v. King, 297 Kan. 955, 979-80 , 305 P.3d 641 (2013); see also State v. Trujillo, 296 Kan. 625, 631 , 294 P.3d 281 (2013) (noting court’s decision to omit the ‘real possibility’ language from Voyles test to avoid confusion with the constitutional harmless error test).” Santos-Vega, 299 Kan. at 18 .’ State v. De La Torre, 300 Kan. 591, 596 , 331 P.3d 815 (2014).” State v. Castleberry, 301 Kan. 170, 185-86 , 339 P.3d 795 (2014). 2015See State v. King, 297 Kan. 955, 979-80 , 305 P.3d 641 (2013); see also State v. Trujillo, 296 Kan. 625, 631 , 294 P.3d 281 (2013) (noting court’s decision to omit the ‘real possibility’ language from Voyles test to avoid confusion with the constitutional harmless error test).” Santos-Vega, 299 Kan. at 18 .’ State v. De La Torre, 300 Kan. 591, 596 , 331 P.3d 815 (2014).” State v. Castleberry, 301 Kan. 170, 185-86 , 339 P.3d 795 (2014).	2	2
State v. Castleberrygreen kan · 2014 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 2 sentences 2015See State v. King, 297 Kan. 955, 979-80 , 305 P.3d 641 (2013); see also State v. Trujillo, 296 Kan. 625, 631 , 294 P.3d 281 (2013) (noting court’s decision to omit the ‘real possibility’ language from Voyles test to avoid confusion with the constitutional harmless error test).” Santos-Vega, 299 Kan. at 18 .’ State v. De La Torre, 300 Kan. 591, 596 , 331 P.3d 815 (2014).” State v. Castleberry, 301 Kan. 170, 185-86 , 339 P.3d 795 (2014). 2015See State v. King, 297 Kan. 955, 979-80 , 305 P.3d 641 (2013); see also State v. Trujillo, 296 Kan. 625, 631 , 294 P.3d 281 (2013) (noting court’s decision to omit the ‘real possibility’ language from Voyles test to avoid confusion with the constitutional harmless error test).” Santos-Vega, 299 Kan. at 18 .’ State v. De La Torre, 300 Kan. 591, 596 , 331 P.3d 815 (2014).” State v. Castleberry, 301 Kan. 170, 185-86 , 339 P.3d 795 (2014).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Voyles green kan · 2007 2 sentences 2013Voyles, 284 Kan. at 244 . 2013Voyles, 284 Kan. at 244 .	2	2013–2013
State v. Kitchen green wash · 2004 2 sentences 2010The second part of the Voyles analysis appears to be derived from State v. Timley, 255 Kan. 286, 289 , 875 P.2d 242 (1994), which, in turn, utilized the rule applied in State v. Kitchen, 110 Wash.2d 403, 409 , 756 P.2d 105 (1988). 2010The second part of the Voyles analysis appears to be derived from State v. Timley, 255 Kan. 286, 289 , 875 P.2d 242 (1994), which, in turn, utilized the rule applied in State v. Kitchen, 110 Wash.2d 403, 409 , 756 P.2d 105 (1988).	1	2010–2010
State v. Timley green kan · 1994 2 sentences 2010The second part of the Voyles analysis appears to be derived from State v. Timley, 255 Kan. 286, 289 , 875 P.2d 242 (1994), which, in turn, utilized the rule applied in State v. Kitchen, 110 Wash.2d 403, 409 , 756 P.2d 105 (1988). 2010The second part of the Voyles analysis appears to be derived from State v. Timley, 255 Kan. 286, 289 , 875 P.2d 242 (1994), which, in turn, utilized the rule applied in State v. Kitchen, 110 Wash.2d 403, 409 , 756 P.2d 105 (1988).	1	2010–2010
State v. Voyles green kanctapp · 2005 2 sentences 2007The Court of Appeals affirmed in State v. Voyles, 34 Kan.App.2d 110 , 116 P.3d 720 . 2007The Court of Appeals affirmed in State v. Voyles, 34 Kan.App.2d 110 , 116 P.3d 720 .	1	2007–2007

Statutes the citing opinions construe

KS § K.S.A. § 60-261 (4) KS § K.S.A. § 21-3401 (3) KS § K.S.A. § 21-3504 (3) KS § K.S.A. § 22-3421 (3) KS § K.S.A. § 22-3423 (3) KS § K.S.A. § 22-3601 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

KS 9 (2007–2015) PA 2 (1987–1989)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check