9 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Leegreen2 sentences2013Kang , 02-2812, at p. 3, 859 So.2d at 652 ; Cross , 93-1189 at p. 6, 658 So.2d at 686 ; Robertson , 92-2660 at p. 2, 630 So.2d at 1280 ; State v. Lee, 559 So.2d 1310, 1316 (La.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 954 , 111 S.Ct. 1431 , 113 L.Ed.2d 482 (1991). 2012Kang , 02-2812, at p. 3, 859 So.2d at 652 ; Cross , 93-1189 at p. 6, 658 So.2d at 686 ; Robertson , 92-2660 at p. 2, 630 So.2d at 1280 ; State v. Lee, 559 So.2d 1310, 1316 (La.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 954 , 111 S.Ct. 1431 , 113 L.Ed.2d 482 (1991). | 4 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Kang
green
2 sentences2013Kang , 02-2812, at p. 3, 859 So.2d at 652 ; Cross , 93-1189 at p. 6, 658 So.2d at 686 ; Robertson , 92-2660 at p. 2, 630 So.2d at 1280 ; State v. Lee, 559 So.2d 1310, 1316 (La.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 954 , 111 S.Ct. 1431 , 113 L.Ed.2d 482 (1991). 2009Kang, supra. When a defendant uses a peremptory challenge after a challenge for cause has been denied, the defendant must show: (1) erroneous denial of the challenge for cause; and (2) use of all peremptory challenges. | 4 | 2007–2013 |
Function Junction, Inc. v. Crowe
green
2 sentences2013Kang , 02-2812, at p. 3, 859 So.2d at 652 ; Cross , 93-1189 at p. 6, 658 So.2d at 686 ; Robertson , 92-2660 at p. 2, 630 So.2d at 1280 ; State v. Lee, 559 So.2d 1310, 1316 (La.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 954 , 111 S.Ct. 1431 , 113 L.Ed.2d 482 (1991). 2012Kang , 02-2812, at p. 3, 859 So.2d at 652 ; Cross , 93-1189 at p. 6, 658 So.2d at 686 ; Robertson , 92-2660 at p. 2, 630 So.2d at 1280 ; State v. Lee, 559 So.2d 1310, 1316 (La.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 954 , 111 S.Ct. 1431 , 113 L.Ed.2d 482 (1991). | 4 | 1993–2013 |
State v. Ross
green
2 sentences2009LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 800; State v. Ross, 623 So.2d 643 (La.1993); State v. Gatti, 39,833 (La.App.2d Cir.10/13/05), 914 So.2d 74 , writ denied, 2005-2394 (La.4/17/06), 926 So.2d 511 . 1994This is further illustrated in the case of State v. Ross, supra , in which the court stated: "When a defendant uses a peremptory challenge after a challenge for cause has been denied, the defendant must show: (1) The erroneous denial of the challenge for cause; and (2) use of all peremptory challenges." (Emphasis ours.) We cannot determine that any prejudice resulted under these facts. | 4 | 1994–2009 |
State v. Robertson
green
2 sentences2013Kang , 02-2812, at p. 3, 859 So.2d at 652 ; Cross , 93-1189 at p. 6, 658 So.2d at 686 ; Robertson , 92-2660 at p. 2, 630 So.2d at 1280 ; State v. Lee, 559 So.2d 1310, 1316 (La.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 954 , 111 S.Ct. 1431 , 113 L.Ed.2d 482 (1991). 2012Kang , 02-2812, at p. 3, 859 So.2d at 652 ; Cross , 93-1189 at p. 6, 658 So.2d at 686 ; Robertson , 92-2660 at p. 2, 630 So.2d at 1280 ; State v. Lee, 559 So.2d 1310, 1316 (La.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 954 , 111 S.Ct. 1431 , 113 L.Ed.2d 482 (1991). | 3 | 2007–2013 |
State v. Cross
green
2 sentences2013Kang , 02-2812, at p. 3, 859 So.2d at 652 ; Cross , 93-1189 at p. 6, 658 So.2d at 686 ; Robertson , 92-2660 at p. 2, 630 So.2d at 1280 ; State v. Lee, 559 So.2d 1310, 1316 (La.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 954 , 111 S.Ct. 1431 , 113 L.Ed.2d 482 (1991). 2012Kang , 02-2812, at p. 3, 859 So.2d at 652 ; Cross , 93-1189 at p. 6, 658 So.2d at 686 ; Robertson , 92-2660 at p. 2, 630 So.2d at 1280 ; State v. Lee, 559 So.2d 1310, 1316 (La.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 954 , 111 S.Ct. 1431 , 113 L.Ed.2d 482 (1991). | 3 | 2007–2013 |
DeParias v. United States
green
2 sentences2013Kang , 02-2812, at p. 3, 859 So.2d at 652 ; Cross , 93-1189 at p. 6, 658 So.2d at 686 ; Robertson , 92-2660 at p. 2, 630 So.2d at 1280 ; State v. Lee, 559 So.2d 1310, 1316 (La.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 954 , 111 S.Ct. 1431 , 113 L.Ed.2d 482 (1991). 2012Kang , 02-2812, at p. 3, 859 So.2d at 652 ; Cross , 93-1189 at p. 6, 658 So.2d at 686 ; Robertson , 92-2660 at p. 2, 630 So.2d at 1280 ; State v. Lee, 559 So.2d 1310, 1316 (La.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 954 , 111 S.Ct. 1431 , 113 L.Ed.2d 482 (1991). | 3 | 2007–2013 |
State v. Gatti
green
1 sentence2009LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 800; State v. Ross, 623 So.2d 643 (La.1993); State v. Gatti, 39,833 (La.App.2d Cir.10/13/05), 914 So.2d 74 , writ denied, 2005-2394 (La.4/17/06), 926 So.2d 511 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Succession of Crawford
green
1 sentence2009LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 800; State v. Ross, 623 So.2d 643 (La.1993); State v. Gatti, 39,833 (La.App.2d Cir.10/13/05), 914 So.2d 74 , writ denied, 2005-2394 (La.4/17/06), 926 So.2d 511 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Scott
green
1 sentence2006State v. Scott, 04-1312 (La.01/19/06), 921 So.2d 904 ; State v. Ross, 623 So.2d 643 (La.1993). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Monroe
green
1 sentence1993State v. Lee, 559 So.2d 1310, 1316 (La.1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 1431 , 113 L.Ed.2d 482 (1991); State v. Sugar, 408 So.2d 1329 (La.1982); State v. Sylvester, 400 So.2d 640 (La.1981); State v. Monroe, 366 So.2d 1345 (La.1978). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State v. Sylvester
green
1 sentence1993State v. Lee, 559 So.2d 1310, 1316 (La.1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 1431 , 113 L.Ed.2d 482 (1991); State v. Sugar, 408 So.2d 1329 (La.1982); State v. Sylvester, 400 So.2d 640 (La.1981); State v. Monroe, 366 So.2d 1345 (La.1978). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State v. Sugar
green
1 sentence1993State v. Lee, 559 So.2d 1310, 1316 (La.1990), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 1431 , 113 L.Ed.2d 482 (1991); State v. Sugar, 408 So.2d 1329 (La.1982); State v. Sylvester, 400 So.2d 640 (La.1981); State v. Monroe, 366 So.2d 1345 (La.1978). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.