case is harmless error in Maryland

9 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2022 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

Case	Followed	Cited
Flores v. Bellgreen md · 2007 · cited in 7 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2009–2022 2 sentences 2022App. 414, 443 (2012) (“A verdict will not be overturned unless the error was likely to have affected the verdict below; and ‘an error that does not affect the outcome of the case is harmless error.’” (quoting Flores v. Bell, 398 Md. 27, 33 (2007))). 2022App. 414, 443 (2012) (“A verdict will not be overturned unless the error was likely to have affected the verdict below; and ‘an error that does not affect the outcome of the case is harmless error.’” (quoting Flores v. Bell, 398 Md. 27, 33 (2007))).	3	7
Barksdale v. Wilkowskygreen md · 2011 · cited in 3 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2012–2016 2 sentences 2016See Barksdale v. Wilkowsky, 419 Md. 649, 660 , 20 A.3d 765 (2011) (“[T]he burden to show error in civil cases is on the appealing party to show that an error caused prejudice.”); Flores v. Bell, 398 Md. 27, 33 , 919 A.2d 716 (2007) (“Prejudice can be demonstrated by showing that the error was likely to have affected the verdict below; an error that does not affect the outcome of the case is harmless error.”). 2016See Barksdale v. Wilkowsky, 419 Md. 649, 660 , 20 A.3d 765 (2011) (“[T]he burden to show error in civil cases is on the appealing party to show that an error caused prejudice.”); Flores v. Bell, 398 Md. 27, 33 , 919 A.2d 716 (2007) (“Prejudice can be demonstrated by showing that the error was likely to have affected the verdict below; an error that does not affect the outcome of the case is harmless error.”).	1	3
Beahm v. Shortallgreen md · 1977 · cited in 2 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2007–2008 2 sentences 2008Crane, 382 Md. at 91 , 854 A.2d 1180 ; Beahm, 279 Md. at 331 , 368 A.2d 1005 . 2008Crane, 382 Md. at 91 , 854 A.2d 1180 ; Beahm, 279 Md. at 331 , 368 A.2d 1005 .	1	2

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

Case	Cited	Years
Crane v. Dunn green md · 2004 2 sentences 2008Crane, 382 Md. at 91 , 854 A.2d 1180 ; Beahm, 279 Md. at 331 , 368 A.2d 1005 . 2008Crane, 382 Md. at 91 , 854 A.2d 1180 ; Beahm, 279 Md. at 331 , 368 A.2d 1005 .	2	2007–2008

Where else courts name it

MD 9 (2007–2022) AL 7 (1992–2007) LA 7 (1986–2010) TX 6 (1993–2006) IL 4 (1994–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check