9 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 2003–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Goldstongreen1 sentence2016The affidavit was not “so lacking in indicia of probable cause as to render official belief in its existence entirely unreasonable.” Goldston, 470 Mich at 528 (quotation marks and citation omitted). -5- To prove the offense of receiving and concealing stolen property valued at $20,000 or more, the prosecution must establish the following elements: (1) the property was stolen; (2) the value of the property met the statutory requirement; (3) defendant received, possessed, or concealed the property with knowledge that the property was stolen; (4) the identity of the property as being that previou | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Pratt
green
2 sentences2023For a defendant to be convicted of receiving and concealing stolen property, the prosecution must prove (1) the property was stolen; (2) the value of the property met the statutory requirement; (3) defendant received, possessed, or concealed the property with knowledge that the property was stolen; (4) the identity of the property as being that previously stolen; and (5) the guilty actual or constructive knowledge of the -3- defendant that the property received or concealed was stolen. [Pratt, 254 Mich App at 427 .] On appeal, defendant only challenges whether the prosecution presented suffici 2022The elements of receiving or concealing stolen property are: (1) the property was stolen; (2) the value of the property met the statutory requirement; (3) defendant received, possessed, or concealed the property with knowledge that the property was stolen; (4) the identity of the property as being that previously stolen; and (5) the guilty actual or constructive knowledge of the defendant that the property received or concealed was stolen. [People v Pratt, 254 Mich App 425, 427 ; 656 NW2d 866 (2002).] The circuit court determined that there was insufficient evidence that Kiesgen concealed stol | 8 | 2003–2023 |
People v. Nowack
green
2 sentences2017In applying this standard, we are required “to draw all reasonable inferences and make credibility choices in support of the jury verdict.” People v Nowack, 462 Mich 392, 400 ; 614 NW2d 78 (2000). -1- To convict a defendant of receiving or concealing stolen property, the prosecution must prove the following elements: (1) the property was stolen; (2) the value of the property met the statutory requirement; (3) defendant received, possessed, or concealed the property with knowledge that the property was stolen; (4) the identity of the property as being that previously stolen; and (5) the guilty 2017In applying this standard, we are required “to draw all reasonable inferences and make credibility choices in support of the jury verdict.” People v Nowack, 462 Mich 392, 400 ; 614 NW2d 78 (2000). -1- To convict a defendant of receiving or concealing stolen property, the prosecution must prove the following elements: (1) the property was stolen; (2) the value of the property met the statutory requirement; (3) defendant received, possessed, or concealed the property with knowledge that the property was stolen; (4) the identity of the property as being that previously stolen; and (5) the guilty | 2 | 2017–2017 |
People v. Salata
green
2 sentences2023“It is well settled that the fifth element, guilty knowledge, must be found to have existed at the time defendant received the stolen property.” People v Salata, 79 Mich App 415, 421 ; 262 NW2d 844 (1977).1 “Guilty knowledge may be actual or constructive. 2023“It is well settled that the fifth element, guilty knowledge, must be found to have existed at the time defendant received the stolen property.” People v Salata, 79 Mich App 415, 421 ; 262 NW2d 844 (1977).1 “Guilty knowledge may be actual or constructive. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
People v. Quinn
green
2 sentences2003People v Quinn, 219 Mich App 571, 574 ; 557 NW2d 151 (1996). 2003People v Quinn, 219 Mich App 571, 574 ; 557 NW2d 151 (1996). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.