statute of repose bar in Michigan

2017A statute comports with due process if it "bears a reasonable relation to a permissible legislative objective." Trentadue v. Buckler Automatic Lawn Sprinkler Co. , 479 Mich. 378 , 404, 738 N.W.2d 664 (2007) (quotation marks and citation omitted).

2017A statute comports with due process if it “bears a reasonable relation to a permissible legislative objective.” Trentadue v Buckler Automatic Lawn Sprinkler Co, 479 Mich 378, 404 ; 738 NW2d 664 (2007) (citation and quotation marks omitted).

1998O’Brien v Hazelet & Erdal, 410 Mich 1, 15 ; 299 NW2d 336 (1980); Oole v Oosting, 82 Mich App 291, 298-300 ; 266 NW2d 795 (1978). [ 219 Mich App 167, n1 .] 4 No person may maintain any action to recover damages for any injury to property, real or personal, or for bodily injury or wrongful death, arising out of the defective and unsafe condition of an improvement to real property, nor any action for contribution or indemnity for damages sustained as a result of such injury against any state licensed architect or professional engineer performing or furnishing the design or supervision of construc

1998O’Brien v Hazelet & Erdal, 410 Mich 1, 15 ; 299 NW2d 336 (1980); Oole v Oosting, 82 Mich App 291, 298-300 ; 266 NW2d 795 (1978). [ 219 Mich App 167, n1 .] 4 No person may maintain any action to recover damages for any injury to property, real or personal, or for bodily injury or wrongful death, arising out of the defective and unsafe condition of an improvement to real property, nor any action for contribution or indemnity for damages sustained as a result of such injury against any state licensed architect or professional engineer performing or furnishing the design or supervision of construc

2018Unlike a statute of limitations, a statute of repose may bar a claim before an injury or damage occurs.”) (Quotation marks and citation omitted; ellipses in original); Nortley v Hurst, 321 Mich App 566, 572 ; 908 NW2d 919 (2017) (“Unlike a statute of limitations, a statute of repose bars a claim after a fixed period of time from the defendant’s act or omission and may prevent accrual of a claim even if the injury happens after the statutory period has expired.”).

2016Unlike a statute of limitation, then, a statute of repose may bar a claim before an injury or damage occurs. [Frank v Linkner, 310 Mich App 169, 179 ; 871 NW2d 363 (2015), lv gtd 499 Mich 859 ; 873 NW2d 591 (2016) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).] As indicated above, MCL 600.5838b(1) provides that a claim for legal malpractice cannot be filed after either (1) the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, i.e., two years as set forth in MCL 600.5805(6), or (2) six years after the act or omission that forms the basis of the claim, “whichever is earlier.” (Emphasis add

2016Unlike a statute of limitation, then, a statute of repose may bar a claim before an injury or damage occurs. [Frank v Linkner, 310 Mich App 169, 179 ; 871 NW2d 363 (2015), lv gtd 499 Mich 859 ; 873 NW2d 591 (2016) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).] As indicated above, MCL 600.5838b(1) provides that a claim for legal malpractice cannot be filed after either (1) the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, i.e., two years as set forth in MCL 600.5805(6), or (2) six years after the act or omission that forms the basis of the claim, “whichever is earlier.” (Emphasis add

2016Unlike a statute of limitation, then, a statute of repose may bar a claim before an injury or damage occurs. [Frank v Linkner, 310 Mich App 169, 179 ; 871 NW2d 363 (2015), lv gtd 499 Mich 859 ; 873 NW2d 591 (2016) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).] As indicated above, MCL 600.5838b(1) provides that a claim for legal malpractice cannot be filed after either (1) the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, i.e., two years as set forth in MCL 600.5805(6), or (2) six years after the act or omission that forms the basis of the claim, “whichever is earlier.” (Emphasis add

2006Unlike a statute of limitations, a statute of repose may bar a claim before an injury or damage occurs.’ ” Frankenmuth Mut Ins Co v Marlette Homes, Inc, 456 Mich 511 , 513 n 3; 573 NW2d 611 (1998)(citation omitted).

2006Unlike a statute of limitations, a statute of repose may bar a claim before an injury or damage occurs.’ ” Frankenmuth Mut Ins Co v Marlette Homes, Inc, 456 Mich 511 , 513 n 3; 573 NW2d 611 (1998)(citation omitted).