determination of manifest error in Louisiana

67 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

Case	Followed	Cited
Stobart v. State Through DOTDgreen la · 1993 · cited in 17 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1994–2020 2 sentences 2020Stobart v. State through Dept. of Transp. and Development, 617 So.2d 880, 882 (La. 1993). 2011Stobart v. State through Dept. of Transp. and Development, 617 So.2d 880 (La.1993).	2	17
Arceneaux v. Dominguegreen la · 1978 · cited in 18 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1991–2009 2 sentences 2009Stobart v. State through Dept. of Transp, and Development, 617 So.2d 880 (La.1993); Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La. 1978). 1997“In reviewing the factual findings of a trial court, an appellate court is limited to a determination of manifest error.” Canter v. Koehring Co., 283 So.2d 716 (La.1973); Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La.1978), on remand 370 So.2d 1262 (La.App. 3 Cir.1979), writ denied 374 So.2d 660 (La.1979); Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840 (La.1989), on remand 558 So.2d 1360 (La.App. 4 Cir.1990), writ denied 561 So.2d 105 (La.1990); Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257 (La.1993), cert, denied 93-933 (U.S.La., 2/22/94), 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 , 62 USLW 3544 , 62 USL	1	18
Rosell v. Escogreen la · 1989 · cited in 4 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1994–2002 2 sentences 2002Stobart v. State through Dept. of Transp. and Development, 617 So.2d 880 (La.1993); Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840 (La.1989). 1997“In reviewing the factual findings of a trial court, an appellate court is limited to a determination of manifest error.” Canter v. Koehring Co., 283 So.2d 716 (La.1973); Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La.1978), on remand 370 So.2d 1262 (La.App. 3 Cir.1979), writ denied 374 So.2d 660 (La.1979); Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840 (La.1989), on remand 558 So.2d 1360 (La.App. 4 Cir.1990), writ denied 561 So.2d 105 (La.1990); Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257 (La.1993), cert, denied 93-933 (U.S.La., 2/22/94), 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 , 62 USLW 3544 , 62 USL	1	4

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (13)

Case	Cited	Years
Hill v. Morehouse Parish Police Jury green la · 1996 2 sentences 2018Hill v. Morehouse Parish Police Jury , 95-1100, p. 4 (La. 1/16/96), 666 So.2d 612 , 615. 2011Hill v. Morehouse Parish Police Jury, 95-1100, p. 4 (La.1/16/96), 666 So.2d 612, 614 .	39	1996–2018
Kelley v. M & M DODGE, INC. green la · 1979 2 sentences 2002Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La. 1978), writ denied, 374 So.2d 660 (La. 1979); Fleming v. American Auto. 1997“In reviewing the factual findings of a trial court, an appellate court is limited to a determination of manifest error.” Canter v. Koehring Co., 283 So.2d 716 (La.1973); Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La.1978), on remand 370 So.2d 1262 (La.App. 3 Cir.1979), writ denied 374 So.2d 660 (La.1979); Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840 (La.1989), on remand 558 So.2d 1360 (La.App. 4 Cir.1990), writ denied 561 So.2d 105 (La.1990); Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257 (La.1993), cert, denied 93-933 (U.S.La., 2/22/94), 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 , 62 USLW 3544 , 62 USL	3	1997–2002
State Ex Rel. WHV v. JAV neutral lactapp · 2002 2 sentences 2019App. 2 Cir. 2/27/02), 811 So. 2d 189 , the court stated that under the manifest error standard of review, in reviewing the factual findings of a trial court, an appellate court is limited to a determination of manifest error. 2019App. 2 Cir. 2/27/02), 811 So. 2d 189 , the court stated that under the manifest error standard of review, in reviewing the factual findings of a trial court, an appellate court is limited to a determination of manifest error.	2	2019–2019
Canter v. Koehring Company green la · 1973 2 sentences 1997“In reviewing the factual findings of a trial court, an appellate court is limited to a determination of manifest error.” Canter v. Koehring Co., 283 So.2d 716 (La.1973); Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La.1978), on remand 370 So.2d 1262 (La.App. 3 Cir.1979), writ denied 374 So.2d 660 (La.1979); Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840 (La.1989), on remand 558 So.2d 1360 (La.App. 4 Cir.1990), writ denied 561 So.2d 105 (La.1990); Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257 (La.1993), cert, denied 93-933 (U.S.La., 2/22/94), 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 , 62 USLW 3544 , 62 USL 1997Canter v. Koehring Co., 283 So.2d 716 (La.1973).	2	1997–1997
Fontana v. Fontana green lactapp · 1983 1 sentence 1999Fontana, supra at 354 .	1	1999–1999
Whitmore v. Board of Education of Dekalb Community School District No. 428 neutral scotus · 1994 1 sentence 1997“In reviewing the factual findings of a trial court, an appellate court is limited to a determination of manifest error.” Canter v. Koehring Co., 283 So.2d 716 (La.1973); Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La.1978), on remand 370 So.2d 1262 (La.App. 3 Cir.1979), writ denied 374 So.2d 660 (La.1979); Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840 (La.1989), on remand 558 So.2d 1360 (La.App. 4 Cir.1990), writ denied 561 So.2d 105 (La.1990); Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257 (La.1993), cert, denied 93-933 (U.S.La., 2/22/94), 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 , 62 USLW 3544 , 62 USL	1	1997–1997
Ramaswami v. Texas Department of Human Services green scotus · 1994 1 sentence 1997“In reviewing the factual findings of a trial court, an appellate court is limited to a determination of manifest error.” Canter v. Koehring Co., 283 So.2d 716 (La.1973); Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La.1978), on remand 370 So.2d 1262 (La.App. 3 Cir.1979), writ denied 374 So.2d 660 (La.1979); Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840 (La.1989), on remand 558 So.2d 1360 (La.App. 4 Cir.1990), writ denied 561 So.2d 105 (La.1990); Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257 (La.1993), cert, denied 93-933 (U.S.La., 2/22/94), 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 , 62 USLW 3544 , 62 USL	1	1997–1997
Thomas Nelson, Inc. v. Harper House, Inc green scotus · 1994 1 sentence 1997“In reviewing the factual findings of a trial court, an appellate court is limited to a determination of manifest error.” Canter v. Koehring Co., 283 So.2d 716 (La.1973); Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La.1978), on remand 370 So.2d 1262 (La.App. 3 Cir.1979), writ denied 374 So.2d 660 (La.1979); Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840 (La.1989), on remand 558 So.2d 1360 (La.App. 4 Cir.1990), writ denied 561 So.2d 105 (La.1990); Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257 (La.1993), cert, denied 93-933 (U.S.La., 2/22/94), 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 , 62 USLW 3544 , 62 USL	1	1997–1997
Lumley v. Hogsett green scotus · 1994 1 sentence 1997“In reviewing the factual findings of a trial court, an appellate court is limited to a determination of manifest error.” Canter v. Koehring Co., 283 So.2d 716 (La.1973); Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La.1978), on remand 370 So.2d 1262 (La.App. 3 Cir.1979), writ denied 374 So.2d 660 (La.1979); Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840 (La.1989), on remand 558 So.2d 1360 (La.App. 4 Cir.1990), writ denied 561 So.2d 105 (La.1990); Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257 (La.1993), cert, denied 93-933 (U.S.La., 2/22/94), 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 , 62 USLW 3544 , 62 USL	1	1997–1997
Rosell v. Esco green la · 1990 1 sentence 1997“In reviewing the factual findings of a trial court, an appellate court is limited to a determination of manifest error.” Canter v. Koehring Co., 283 So.2d 716 (La.1973); Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La.1978), on remand 370 So.2d 1262 (La.App. 3 Cir.1979), writ denied 374 So.2d 660 (La.1979); Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840 (La.1989), on remand 558 So.2d 1360 (La.App. 4 Cir.1990), writ denied 561 So.2d 105 (La.1990); Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257 (La.1993), cert, denied 93-933 (U.S.La., 2/22/94), 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 , 62 USLW 3544 , 62 USL	1	1997–1997
Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp. green la · 1993 1 sentence 1997“In reviewing the factual findings of a trial court, an appellate court is limited to a determination of manifest error.” Canter v. Koehring Co., 283 So.2d 716 (La.1973); Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La.1978), on remand 370 So.2d 1262 (La.App. 3 Cir.1979), writ denied 374 So.2d 660 (La.1979); Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840 (La.1989), on remand 558 So.2d 1360 (La.App. 4 Cir.1990), writ denied 561 So.2d 105 (La.1990); Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257 (La.1993), cert, denied 93-933 (U.S.La., 2/22/94), 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 , 62 USLW 3544 , 62 USL	1	1997–1997
Rosell v. ESCO green lactapp · 1990 1 sentence 1997“In reviewing the factual findings of a trial court, an appellate court is limited to a determination of manifest error.” Canter v. Koehring Co., 283 So.2d 716 (La.1973); Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La.1978), on remand 370 So.2d 1262 (La.App. 3 Cir.1979), writ denied 374 So.2d 660 (La.1979); Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840 (La.1989), on remand 558 So.2d 1360 (La.App. 4 Cir.1990), writ denied 561 So.2d 105 (La.1990); Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257 (La.1993), cert, denied 93-933 (U.S.La., 2/22/94), 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 , 62 USLW 3544 , 62 USL	1	1997–1997
Arceneaux v. Domingue green lactapp · 1979 1 sentence 1997“In reviewing the factual findings of a trial court, an appellate court is limited to a determination of manifest error.” Canter v. Koehring Co., 283 So.2d 716 (La.1973); Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La.1978), on remand 370 So.2d 1262 (La.App. 3 Cir.1979), writ denied 374 So.2d 660 (La.1979); Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840 (La.1989), on remand 558 So.2d 1360 (La.App. 4 Cir.1990), writ denied 561 So.2d 105 (La.1990); Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp., 623 So.2d 1257 (La.1993), cert, denied 93-933 (U.S.La., 2/22/94), 510 U.S. 1114 , 114 S.Ct. 1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 , 62 USLW 3544 , 62 USL	1	1997–1997

Statutes the citing opinions construe

LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 9:2800 (7) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 9:2794 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check