67 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2025 9 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Estate of Trewgreen2 sentences2005In the absence of plain error, where an issue is raised for the first time in [the higher appellate court], it will be disregarded inasmuch as the district court cannot commit error in resolving an issue never presented and submitted for disposition.” In re Estate of Trew, 244 Neb. 490, 498 , 507 N.W.2d 478, 483 (1993) (quoting Haeffner v. State, 220 Neb. 560 , 371 N.W.2d 658 (1985)). 2005In the absence of plain error, where an issue is raised for the first time in [the higher appellate court], it will be disregarded inasmuch as the district court cannot commit error in resolving an issue never presented and submitted for disposition.” In re Estate of Trew, 244 Neb. 490, 498 , 507 N.W.2d 478, 483 (1993) (quoting Haeffner v. State, 220 Neb. 560 , 371 N.W.2d 658 (1985)). | 3 | 4 |
State v. Andersongreen2 sentences2025See State v. Anderson, 14 Neb. 2021See State v. Anderson, 14 Neb. | 3 | 3 |
Haeffner v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUB. INSTgreen2 sentences2005In the absence of plain error, where an issue is raised for the first time in [the higher appellate court], it will be disregarded inasmuch as the district court cannot commit error in resolving an issue never presented and submitted for disposition.” In re Estate of Trew, 244 Neb. 490, 498 , 507 N.W.2d 478, 483 (1993) (quoting Haeffner v. State, 220 Neb. 560 , 371 N.W.2d 658 (1985)). 2005In the absence of plain error, where an issue is raised for the first time in [the higher appellate court], it will be disregarded inasmuch as the district court cannot commit error in resolving an issue never presented and submitted for disposition.” In re Estate of Trew, 244 Neb. 490, 498 , 507 N.W.2d 478, 483 (1993) (quoting Haeffner v. State, 220 Neb. 560 , 371 N.W.2d 658 (1985)). | 2 | 8 |
State v. Fletchergreen2 sentences1993We have frequently stated, “In the absence of plain error, when an issue is raised for the first time in an appellate court, *577 the issue will be disregarded inasmuch as a trial court cannot commit error regarding an issue never presented and submitted for disposition in the trial court.” State v. Oldfield, 236 Neb. 433, 438 , 461 N.W.2d 554, 559 (1990) (citing State v. Fletcher, 221 Neb. 562 , 378 N.W.2d 859 (1985)). 1993We have frequently stated, “In the absence of plain error, when an issue is raised for the first time in an appellate court, *577 the issue will be disregarded inasmuch as a trial court cannot commit error regarding an issue never presented and submitted for disposition in the trial court.” State v. Oldfield, 236 Neb. 433, 438 , 461 N.W.2d 554, 559 (1990) (citing State v. Fletcher, 221 Neb. 562 , 378 N.W.2d 859 (1985)). | 2 | 3 |
State v. Oldfieldgreen2 sentences1993We have frequently stated, “In the absence of plain error, when an issue is raised for the first time in an appellate court, *577 the issue will be disregarded inasmuch as a trial court cannot commit error regarding an issue never presented and submitted for disposition in the trial court.” State v. Oldfield, 236 Neb. 433, 438 , 461 N.W.2d 554, 559 (1990) (citing State v. Fletcher, 221 Neb. 562 , 378 N.W.2d 859 (1985)). 1993We have frequently stated, “In the absence of plain error, when an issue is raised for the first time in an appellate court, *577 the issue will be disregarded inasmuch as a trial court cannot commit error regarding an issue never presented and submitted for disposition in the trial court.” State v. Oldfield, 236 Neb. 433, 438 , 461 N.W.2d 554, 559 (1990) (citing State v. Fletcher, 221 Neb. 562 , 378 N.W.2d 859 (1985)). | 2 | 2 |
Holden v. Urbangreen2 sentences1987In Holden v. Urban, 224 Neb. 472, 474 , 398 N.W.2d 699, 701 (1987), we stated: In the absence of plain error, where an issue is raised for the first time in the Supreme Court, such issue will be disregarded inasmuch as the court whose judgment is being reviewed cannot commit error regarding an issue never presented and submitted for disposition. 1987In Holden v. Urban, 224 Neb. 472, 474 , 398 N.W.2d 699, 701 (1987), we stated: In the absence of plain error, where an issue is raised for the first time in the Supreme Court, such issue will be disregarded inasmuch as the court whose judgment is being reviewed cannot commit error regarding an issue never presented and submitted for disposition. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Molinagreen2 sentences2021As has been often stated, “In the absence of plain error, when an issue is raised for the first time in an appellate court, the issue will be disregarded inasmuch as the trial court cannot commit error regarding an issue never presented and submitted for disposition in the trial court.” State v. Molina, 271 Neb. 488, 529 , 713 N.W.2d 412, 447 (2006). 2021As has been often stated, “In the absence of plain error, when an issue is raised for the first time in an appellate court, the issue will be disregarded inasmuch as the trial court cannot commit error regarding an issue never presented and submitted for disposition in the trial court.” State v. Molina, 271 Neb. 488, 529 , 713 N.W.2d 412, 447 (2006). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Dixongreen2 sentences2003State v. Dixon, 237 Neb. 630 , 467 N.W.2d 397 (1991). 2003State v. Dixon, 237 Neb. 630 , 467 N.W.2d 397 (1991). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Munozgreen2 sentences2021But as the Nebraska Supreme Court has continuously held under such circumstances, “In the absence of plain error, - 16 - where an issue is raised for the first time in an appellate court, it will be disregarded inasmuch as a lower court cannot commit error in resolving an issue never presented and submitted to it for disposition.” State v. Munoz, 303 Neb. 69, 75 , 927 N.W.2d 25, 32 (2019). 2021But as the Nebraska Supreme Court has continuously held under such circumstances, “In the absence of plain error, - 16 - where an issue is raised for the first time in an appellate court, it will be disregarded inasmuch as a lower court cannot commit error in resolving an issue never presented and submitted to it for disposition.” State v. Munoz, 303 Neb. 69, 75 , 927 N.W.2d 25, 32 (2019). | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Salisburygreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. 1987 Jeep Wagoneer VIN 1JCMT7543HT161853green | 1 | 1 |
| Manske v. Manskegreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Paintergreen | 1 | 1 |
| Norris v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.green | 1 | 1 |
| Farmers Co-Op Grain Co. v. Leuenbergergreen | 1 | 1 |
| Gonschior v. Drewesgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lackman v. Rousselle
green
2 sentences2020Lackman v. Rousselle, 257 Neb. 87 , 596 N.W.2d 15 (1999). 2020Lackman v. Rousselle, 257 Neb. 87 , 596 N.W.2d 15 (1999). | 4 | 1999–2020 |
Jirkovsky v. Jirkovsky
green
2 sentences1999Jirkovsky v. Jirkovsky, 247 Neb. 141 , 525 N.W.2d 615 (1995). 1999Jirkovsky v. Jirkovsky, 247 Neb. 141 , 525 N.W.2d 615 (1995). | 4 | 1995–1999 |
In Re Trust of Rosenberg
green
2 sentences2013In re Trust of Rosenberg, 273 Neb. 59 , 727 N.W.2d 430 (2007). 2013In re Trust of Rosenberg, 273 Neb. 59 , 727 N.W.2d 430 (2007). | 3 | 2008–2013 |
In Re Interest of Natasha H.
green
2 sentences2005In re Interest of Natasha H. & Sierra H., 258 Neb. 131 , 602 N.W.2d 439 (1999). 2005In re Interest of Natasha H. & Sierra H., 258 Neb. 131 , 602 N.W.2d 439 (1999). | 3 | 2001–2005 |
Billups Ex Rel. Billups v. Troia
green
2 sentences1998Billups v. Troia, 253 Neb. 295 , 570 N.W.2d 706 (1997); Van Ackeren v. Nebraska Bd. of Parole, 251 Neb. 477 , 558 N.W.2d 48 (1997). 1998Billups v. Troia, 253 Neb. 295 , 570 N.W.2d 706 (1997); Van Ackeren v. Nebraska Bd. of Parole, 251 Neb. 477 , 558 N.W.2d 48 (1997). | 3 | 1998–1998 |
State v. Woolridge-Jones
green
2 sentences2024In the absence of plain error, when an issue is raised for the first time in an appellate court, it will be disregarded inasmuch as a lower 12 See id. 13 State v. Woolridge-Jones, 316 Neb. 500 , 5 N.W.3d 426 (2024). - 743 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 317 Nebraska Reports STATE V. 2024In the absence of plain error, when an issue is raised for the first time in an appellate court, it will be disregarded inasmuch as a lower 12 See id. 13 State v. Woolridge-Jones, 316 Neb. 500 , 5 N.W.3d 426 (2024). - 743 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 317 Nebraska Reports STATE V. | 2 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Yah
green
2 sentences2024In the absence of plain error, when an issue is raised for the first time in an appellate court, it will be disregarded inasmuch as a lower 12 See id. 13 State v. Woolridge-Jones, 316 Neb. 500 , 5 N.W.3d 426 (2024). - 743 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 317 Nebraska Reports STATE V. 2024In the absence of plain error, when an issue is raised for the first time in an appellate court, it will be disregarded inasmuch as a lower 12 See id. 13 State v. Woolridge-Jones, 316 Neb. 500 , 5 N.W.3d 426 (2024). - 743 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 317 Nebraska Reports STATE V. | 2 | 2024–2024 |
Salem Grain Co. v. Consolidated Grain & Barge Co.
green
2 sentences2018Salem Grain Co. v. Consolidated Grain & Barge Co., 297 Neb. 682 , 900 N.W.2d 909 (2017). 2018Salem Grain Co. v. Consolidated Grain & Barge Co., 297 Neb. 682 , 900 N.W.2d 909 (2017). | 2 | 2018–2018 |
In Re Estate of Rosso
green
2 sentences2016In re Estate of Rosso, 270 Neb. 323 , 701 N.W.2d 355 (2005). 2016In re Estate of Rosso, 270 Neb. 323 , 701 N.W.2d 355 (2005). | 2 | 2014–2016 |
State v. Carter
green
2 sentences2007In re Petition of SID No. 1, 270 Neb. 856 , 708 N.W.2d 809 (2006); State v. Carter, 255 Neb. 591 , 586 N.W.2d 818 (1998). 2007In re Petition of SID No. 1, 270 Neb. 856 , 708 N.W.2d 809 (2006); State v. Carter, 255 Neb. 591 , 586 N.W.2d 818 (1998). | 2 | 2006–2007 |
State v. Cisneros
green
2 sentences2002State v. Cisneros, 248 Neb. 372 , 535 N.W.2d 703 (1995); State v. Rust, 247 Neb. 503 , 528 N.W.2d 320 (1995). 2002State v. Cisneros, 248 Neb. 372 , 535 N.W.2d 703 (1995); State v. Rust, 247 Neb. 503 , 528 N.W.2d 320 (1995). | 2 | 2001–2002 |
Van Ackeren v. NEBRASKA BOARD OF PAROLE
green
2 sentences1997As in the absence of plain error we consider only claimed errors which are both assigned and argued, Van Ackeren v. Nebraska Bd. of Parole, 251 Neb. 477 , 558 N.W.2d 48 (1997), we concern ourselves solely with the entry of summary judgment. 1997As in the absence of plain error we consider only claimed errors which are both assigned and argued, Van Ackeren v. Nebraska Bd. of Parole, 251 Neb. 477 , 558 N.W.2d 48 (1997), we concern ourselves solely with the entry of summary judgment. | 2 | 1997–1998 |
Schnell v. Schnell
green
1 sentence2022Schnell v. Schnell, 12 Neb. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Simnick
green
2 sentences2021State v. Simnick, 279 Neb. 499 , 779 N.W.2d 335 (2010). 2021State v. Simnick, 279 Neb. 499 , 779 N.W.2d 335 (2010). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Ways v. Shively
green
2 sentences2019Ways v. Shively, 264 Neb. 250 , 646 N.W.2d 621 (2002). 2019Ways v. Shively, 264 Neb. 250 , 646 N.W.2d 621 (2002). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Apkan v. Life Care Centers of America
green
1 sentence2018In the absence of plain error, an appellate court considers only claimed errors that are both assigned and - 161 - Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets 26 Nebraska A ppellate R eports APKAN v. LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA Cite as 26 Neb. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Hewson v. Stevenson
neutral
2 sentences2016Hewson v. Stevenson, 225 Neb. 254 , 404 N.W.2d 35 (1987). 2016Hewson v. Stevenson, 225 Neb. 254 , 404 N.W.2d 35 (1987). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Watt
green
2 sentences2013State v. Watt, 285 Neb. 647 , 832 N.W.2d 459 (2013); State v. Archie, 273 Neb. 612 , 733 N.W.2d 513 (2007). 2013State v. Watt, 285 Neb. 647 , 832 N.W.2d 459 (2013); State v. Archie, 273 Neb. 612 , 733 N.W.2d 513 (2007). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Walz v. Neth
green
1 sentence2013Walz v. Neth, 17 Neb. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Archie
green
2 sentences2013State v. Watt, 285 Neb. 647 , 832 N.W.2d 459 (2013); State v. Archie, 273 Neb. 612 , 733 N.W.2d 513 (2007). 2013State v. Watt, 285 Neb. 647 , 832 N.W.2d 459 (2013); State v. Archie, 273 Neb. 612 , 733 N.W.2d 513 (2007). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Kirkwood v. State
green
1 sentence2009Kirkwood v. State, 16 Neb. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| In Re Sanitary and Imp. Dist. No. 1 green | 1 | 2007–2007 |
| County of Sarpy v. City of Gretna green | 1 | 2006–2006 |
| State v. Tyma green | 1 | 2003–2003 |
| State v. Keup green | 1 | 2003–2003 |
| State v. Rust green | 1 | 2002–2002 |
| State v. McBride green | 1 | 1998–1998 |
| Ashby v. First Data Resources, Inc. green | 1 | 1995–1995 |
| State v. Whitmore green | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| State v. Green green | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| State v. Huebner green | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| State v. Garza green | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| State v. Vrtiska green | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| Wagner v. City of Omaha green | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| Enyeart v. Swartz green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.