9 Mississippi opinions name it 1 courts 2000–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Roland v. Stategreen2 sentences2002The Mississippi Supreme Court concluded in Roland v. State, 666 So.2d 747, 751 (Miss.1995), that an evidentiary hearing is not necessary if the record of the plea hearing reflects that the defendant was advised of the rights of which he claims he was not aware. 2001The Supreme Court has stated that an evidentiary hearing is only necessary where the record of the plea hearing "does not reflect that [the petitioner] was advised concerning the rights of which he now claims ignorance." Roland v. State, 666 So.2d 747, 751 (Miss.1995). | 5 | 6 |
Rogers v. Stategreen1 sentence2019If the defendant’s claims are totally contradicted by the record, the [circuit court] may rely heavily on statements made under oath.” Rogers v. State, 811 So. 2d 367, 370-71 (¶11) (Miss. | 1 | 1 |
Rush v. Stategreen1 sentence2012“When the record of the plea hearing belies the defendant’s claims, an evidentiary hearing is not required.” Rush v. State, 811 So.2d 431, 436 (¶ 12) (Miss.Ct.App.2001). | 1 | 1 |
Simpson v. Stategreen1 sentence2002"When the record of the plea hearing belies the defendant's claims, an evidentiary hearing is not required." Simpson v. State, 678 So.2d 712, 716 (Miss.1996). ¶ 17. | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Stategreen1 sentence2001In order for Rogers to prove the ineffective assistance of counsel claim, under Miss.Code Ann. § 99-39-11(2) (Supp.1997), the allegation must be alleged with specificity. "[H]e must specifically allege facts showing that effective assistance of counsel was not in fact rendered, and he must allege with specificity the fact that but for such purported actions by ineffective counsel, the results of the trial court decision would have been different." Smith v. State, 434 So.2d 212, 219 (Miss. 1983). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Calvert v. State
green
1 sentence2004This Court places great weight upon the sworn testimony of a defendant given during a plea hearing, Calvert v. State, 726 So.2d 228 (¶ 11) (Miss.Ct.App. 1998), and requires something more than mere assertions to disregard that testimony. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.