9 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Matter of Will of Fankbonergreen2 sentences2023“Suspicious circumstances surrounding the creation of the will also raise the presumption [of undue influence].” In re Est. of Smith, 722 So. 2d at 612 (citing Pallatin v. Jones (In re Will of Fankboner), 638 So. 2d 493, 495 (Miss. 1994)). i. Whether Dianne abused her confidential relationship through her involvement in the preparation of the will. ¶19. 2008A presumption of undue influence arises “where a confidential relation exists between a testator and a beneficiary under his will, and the beneficiary has been actively concerned in some way with the preparation or execution of it....” Croft v. Alder, 237 Miss. 713, 722-23 , 115 So.2d 683, 686 (1959); see also, Smith v. Averill, 722 So.2d 606, 612 (18) (Miss.1998) (“Suspicious circumstances surrounding the creation of the will also raise the presumption.”) (citing Pallatin v. Jones, 638 So.2d 493, 495 (Miss.1994)); Genna v. Harrington, 254 So.2d 525, 529 (Miss.1971) (In order for a presumption | 7 | 7 |
In Re Estate of Smithgreen2 sentences2023“Suspicious circumstances surrounding the creation of the will also raise the presumption [of undue influence].” In re Est. of Smith, 722 So. 2d at 612 (citing Pallatin v. Jones (In re Will of Fankboner), 638 So. 2d 493, 495 (Miss. 1994)). i. Whether Dianne abused her confidential relationship through her involvement in the preparation of the will. ¶19. 2008A presumption of undue influence arises “where a confidential relation exists between a testator and a beneficiary under his will, and the beneficiary has been actively concerned in some way with the preparation or execution of it....” Croft v. Alder, 237 Miss. 713, 722-23 , 115 So.2d 683, 686 (1959); see also, Smith v. Averill, 722 So.2d 606, 612 (18) (Miss.1998) (“Suspicious circumstances surrounding the creation of the will also raise the presumption.”) (citing Pallatin v. Jones, 638 So.2d 493, 495 (Miss.1994)); Genna v. Harrington, 254 So.2d 525, 529 (Miss.1971) (In order for a presumption | 2 | 3 |
Genna v. Harringtongreen2 sentences2008A presumption of undue influence arises “where a confidential relation exists between a testator and a beneficiary under his will, and the beneficiary has been actively concerned in some way with the preparation or execution of it....” Croft v. Alder, 237 Miss. 713, 722-23 , 115 So.2d 683, 686 (1959); see also, Smith v. Averill, 722 So.2d 606, 612 (18) (Miss.1998) (“Suspicious circumstances surrounding the creation of the will also raise the presumption.”) (citing Pallatin v. Jones, 638 So.2d 493, 495 (Miss.1994)); Genna v. Harrington, 254 So.2d 525, 529 (Miss.1971) (In order for a presumption 2008A presumption of undue influence arises "where a confidential relation exists between a testator and a beneficiary under his will, and the beneficiary has been actively concerned in some way with the preparation or execution of it...." Croft v. Alder, 237 Miss. 713, 722-23 , 115 So.2d 683, 686 (1959); see also, Smith v. Averill, 722 So.2d 606, 612 (18) (Miss.1998) ("Suspicious circumstances surrounding the creation of the will also raise the presumption.") (citing Pallatin v. Jones, 638 So.2d 493, 495 (Miss.1994)); Genna v. Harrington, 254 So.2d 525, 529 (Miss.1971) (In order for a presumption | 2 | 2 |
Croft v. Aldergreen2 sentences2008A presumption of undue influence arises “where a confidential relation exists between a testator and a beneficiary under his will, and the beneficiary has been actively concerned in some way with the preparation or execution of it....” Croft v. Alder, 237 Miss. 713, 722-23 , 115 So.2d 683, 686 (1959); see also, Smith v. Averill, 722 So.2d 606, 612 (18) (Miss.1998) (“Suspicious circumstances surrounding the creation of the will also raise the presumption.”) (citing Pallatin v. Jones, 638 So.2d 493, 495 (Miss.1994)); Genna v. Harrington, 254 So.2d 525, 529 (Miss.1971) (In order for a presumption 2008A presumption of undue influence arises “where a confidential relation exists between a testator and a beneficiary under his will, and the beneficiary has been actively concerned in some way with the preparation or execution of it....” Croft v. Alder, 237 Miss. 713, 722-23 , 115 So.2d 683, 686 (1959); see also, Smith v. Averill, 722 So.2d 606, 612 (18) (Miss.1998) (“Suspicious circumstances surrounding the creation of the will also raise the presumption.”) (citing Pallatin v. Jones, 638 So.2d 493, 495 (Miss.1994)); Genna v. Harrington, 254 So.2d 525, 529 (Miss.1971) (In order for a presumption | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Estate of Dabney
green
2 sentences2002"Suspicious circumstances surrounding the creation of the will also raise the presumption of undue influence." Id. at (¶ 21). ¶ 16. 2001"Suspicious circumstances surrounding the creation of the will also raise the presumption of undue influence." Id. at 921 . ¶ 8. | 2 | 2001–2002 |