67 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2025 14 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Reidgreen2 sentences2025State v. Reid, 91 S.W.3d 247, 277 (Tenn. 2002). 2022State v. Reid, 91 S.W.3d 247, 277 (Tenn. 2002). | 61 | 64 |
State v. Blandgreen2 sentences2021State v. Reid, 91 S.W.3d 247, 277 (Tenn. 2002). “‘A guilty verdict by the jury, approved by the trial court, accredits the testimony of the witnesses for the State and resolves all conflicts in favor of the prosecution’s theory.’” Id. (quoting State v. Bland, 958 S.W.2d 651, 659 (Tenn. -6- 1997)). 2021State v. Reid, 91 S.W.3d 247, 277 (Tenn. 2002). “‘A guilty verdict by the jury, approved by the trial court, accredits the testimony of the witnesses for the State and resolves all conflicts in favor of the prosecution’s theory.’” Id. (quoting State v. Bland, 958 S.W.2d 651, 659 (Tenn. 1997)). | 7 | 7 |
State v. Tugglegreen2 sentences2000State v. Tuggle, 639 S.W.2d 913, 914 (Tenn. 1982). 2000State v. Tuggle, 639 S.W.2d 913, 914 (Tenn. 1982). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Berrygreen1 sentence2019Pursuant to State v. Berry, 503 S.W.3d 360, 365 (Tenn. 2015), the trial court should enter an amended judgment form in Count 6 imposing a sentence for that conviction. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.