9 New Jersey opinions name it 1 courts 1980–1993 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Rogersgreen2 sentences1980Addressing the first ground, there has been since early common-law “an exceedingly sturdy presumption” of the legitimacy of every child born in wedlock, In re Rogers, 30 N.J.Super. 479, 485 (App.Div.1954), certif. denied 16 N.J. 193 (1954). 1980Addressing the first ground, there has been since early common-law "an exceedingly sturdy presumption" of the legitimacy of every child born in wedlock, In re Rogers, 30 N.J. | 2 | 2 |
Malvasi v. Malvasigreen2 sentences1989Malvasi v. Malvasi, 167 N.J. 1983We agree, however, with J.H. v. M.H. and Malvasi, supra, that an order requiring HLA testing and the admissibility of HLA test results even prior to the effective date of that statute were appropriate judicial actions. | 1 | 4 |
Jh v. Mhgreen1 sentence1987Furthermore, although there are no reported cases in New Jersey holding that HLA test results are admissible in criminal trials, they are admissible in paternity actions whenever they "establish the positive probability of parentage." N.J.S.A. 9:17-51(e); See also, J.H. v. M.H., 177 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Golden v. Zaidegreen1 sentence1983See Camden County Welfare Bd. of Social Services v. Kellner, 93 N.J. 279 (1983). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nm v. Jg
green
2 sentences1993We further noted that “the trial judge should have ordered [the former husband] to undergo the HLA test to which he consented,” id. at 433, 605 A.2d 709 , although no inquiry as to defendant’s parentage was appropriate until after “the presumption [of the former husband’s] paternity was rebutted.” Ibid. 1993We further noted that “the trial judge should have ordered [the former husband] to undergo the HLA test to which he consented,” id. at 433, 605 A.2d 709 , although no inquiry as to defendant’s parentage was appropriate until after “the presumption [of the former husband’s] paternity was rebutted.” Ibid. | 2 | 1993–1993 |
Cramer v. Morrison
green
2 sentences1980In Cramer v. Morrison, 88 Cal.App.3d 873 , 153 Cal.Rptr. 865 (Dist.Ct.App.1979), the court reviewed a decision of the trial court which excluded HLA test results because of an existing statute which permitted blood tests only if they could serve as conclusive evidence of an alleged father’s non-paternity. 1980In Cramer v. Morrison, 88 Cal.App.3d 873 , 153 Cal.Rptr. 865 (Dist.Ct.App.1979), the court reviewed a decision of the trial court which excluded HLA test results because of an existing statute which permitted blood tests only if they could serve as conclusive evidence of an alleged father’s non-paternity. | 2 | 1980–1980 |
State v. Spann
neutral
1 sentence1989State v. Spann, 219 N.J. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
State v. Meacham
green
2 sentences1983The precise question here before us was recently considered by the State of Washington in State v. Meacham, 93 Wash. 2d 735, 738 , 612 P. 2d 795 (Sup.Ct. 1980), which affirmed the trial court's order directing putative fathers to submit to blood and genetic testing, including HLA tests, despite their asserted contrary religious beliefs. 1983The precise question here before us was recently considered by the State of Washington in State v. Meacham, 93 Wash. 2d 735, 738 , 612 P. 2d 795 (Sup.Ct. 1980), which affirmed the trial court's order directing putative fathers to submit to blood and genetic testing, including HLA tests, despite their asserted contrary religious beliefs. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Caputo v. Best Foods, Inc.
neutral
1 sentence1980Addressing the first ground, there has been since early common-law “an exceedingly sturdy presumption” of the legitimacy of every child born in wedlock, In re Rogers, 30 N.J.Super. 479, 485 (App.Div.1954), certif. denied 16 N.J. 193 (1954). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.