Dillenburg hearing in Washington

9 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1969–2025 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

Case	Followed	Cited
In RE DILLENBURG v. Maxwellgreen wash · 1966 · cited in 8 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1969–2025 2 sentences 2025Quijas appealed once again, reiterating his arguments from below and claiming his Dillenburg hearing was 1 Dillenburg v. Maxwell, 70 Wn.2d 331 , 413 P.2d 940 (1966). 2025Quijas appealed once again, reiterating his arguments from below and claiming his Dillenburg hearing was 1 Dillenburg v. Maxwell, 70 Wn.2d 331 , 413 P.2d 940 (1966).	1	8
State v. Moragreen wash · 1999 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004 2 sentences 2004Mora, 138 Wn.2d at 53 (“ ‘the adult court determined the statutory criteria for its “exclusive original jurisdiction” . . . were not met, the court would lack jurisdiction over the juvenile, in the absence of a declination hearing 5 ” (emphasis added) (quoting In re Boot, 130 Wn.2d 553 , 565 n.7, 925 P.2d 964 (1996))); id. (“adult criminal court lacks jurisdiction if juvenile court improperly declined juvenile offender” (emphasis added) (citing State v. Pritchard, 79 Wn. 2004Mora, 138 Wash.2d at 53 , 977 P.2d 564 ("`the adult court determined the statutory criteria for its "exclusive original jurisdiction"... were not met, the court would lack jurisdiction over the juvenile, in the absence of a declination hearing'" (emphasis added) (quoting In re Boot, 130 Wash.2d 553 , 565 n. 7, 925 P.2d 964 (1996))); id. at 53, 977 P.2d 564 ("adult criminal court lacks jurisdiction if juvenile court improperly declined juvenile offender" (emphasis added) (citing State v. Pritchard, 79 Wash.App. 14, 20 , 900 P.2d 560 (1995))).	1	2
Larry O. Black v. United Statesgreen cadc · 1965 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 2 sentences 2015Thus, moving a case from juvenile court to adult court is "a 'critically important' action determining vitally important statutory rights of the juvenile." Kent, 383 U.S. at 556 , (citing Black v. United States, 122 U.S. App. D.C. 393 , 355 F.2d 104, 105 (1965)). 12 No. 32063-4-111 State v. Dalluge By contrast, an adult being provided retroactive relief through a Dillenburg hearing has already been prosecuted in adult court. 2015Thus, moving a case from juvenile court to adult court is "a 'critically important' action determining vitally important statutory rights of the juvenile." Kent, 383 U.S. at 556 , (citing Black v. United States, 122 U.S. App. D.C. 393 , 355 F.2d 104, 105 (1965)). 12 No. 32063-4-111 State v. Dalluge By contrast, an adult being provided retroactive relief through a Dillenburg hearing has already been prosecuted in adult court.	1	1
State v. Dallugegreen washctapp · 2009 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 1 sentence 2015See State v. Dalluge, noted at 148 Wn.	1	1
State v. Mendoza-Lopezgreen washctapp · 2001 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004 2 sentences 2004See Mendoza-Lopez, 105 Wash.App. at 387-89 , 19 P.3d 1123 ; Anderson, 83 Wash.App. at 519-21 , 922 P.2d 163 . 2004See Mendoza-Lopez, 105 Wash.App. at 387-89 , 19 P.3d 1123 ; Anderson, 83 Wash.App. at 519-21 , 922 P.2d 163 .	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Anderson green washctapp · 1996 2 sentences 2005Dillenburg, 70 Wn.2d at 355-56 ; State v. Anderson, 83 Wn. 2005Dillenburg, 70 Wn.2d at 355-56 ; State v. Anderson, 83 Wn.	3	2004–2005
In re the Personal Restraint of Dalluge green wash · 2004 2 sentences 2025Restraint Petition of Dalluge, 152 Wn.2d 772, 782 , 100 P.3d 279 (2004). 3 No. 86360-6-I/4 During the Dillenburg hearing, in addition to hearing from both parties, the court heard testimony from Dr. Heather Evans, a psychologist retained by Quijas, who prepared a report (hereafter referred to as the “Evans Report”) concerning the relationship between race and discretionary decline. 2025Restraint Petition of Dalluge, 152 Wn.2d 772, 782 , 100 P.3d 279 (2004). 3 No. 86360-6-I/4 During the Dillenburg hearing, in addition to hearing from both parties, the court heard testimony from Dr. Heather Evans, a psychologist retained by Quijas, who prepared a report (hereafter referred to as the “Evans Report”) concerning the relationship between race and discretionary decline.	2	2025–2025
State v. Pritchard green washctapp · 1995 2 sentences 2004Mora, 138 Wn.2d at 53 (“ ‘the adult court determined the statutory criteria for its “exclusive original jurisdiction” . . . were not met, the court would lack jurisdiction over the juvenile, in the absence of a declination hearing 5 ” (emphasis added) (quoting In re Boot, 130 Wn.2d 553 , 565 n.7, 925 P.2d 964 (1996))); id. (“adult criminal court lacks jurisdiction if juvenile court improperly declined juvenile offender” (emphasis added) (citing State v. Pritchard, 79 Wn. 2004Mora, 138 Wash.2d at 53 , 977 P.2d 564 ("`the adult court determined the statutory criteria for its "exclusive original jurisdiction"... were not met, the court would lack jurisdiction over the juvenile, in the absence of a declination hearing'" (emphasis added) (quoting In re Boot, 130 Wash.2d 553 , 565 n. 7, 925 P.2d 964 (1996))); id. at 53, 977 P.2d 564 ("adult criminal court lacks jurisdiction if juvenile court improperly declined juvenile offender" (emphasis added) (citing State v. Pritchard, 79 Wash.App. 14, 20 , 900 P.2d 560 (1995))).	2	2004–2004
In Re Boot green wash · 1996 2 sentences 2004Mora, 138 Wn.2d at 53 (“ ‘the adult court determined the statutory criteria for its “exclusive original jurisdiction” . . . were not met, the court would lack jurisdiction over the juvenile, in the absence of a declination hearing 5 ” (emphasis added) (quoting In re Boot, 130 Wn.2d 553 , 565 n.7, 925 P.2d 964 (1996))); id. (“adult criminal court lacks jurisdiction if juvenile court improperly declined juvenile offender” (emphasis added) (citing State v. Pritchard, 79 Wn. 2004Mora, 138 Wn.2d at 53 (“ ‘the adult court determined the statutory criteria for its “exclusive original jurisdiction” . . . were not met, the court would lack jurisdiction over the juvenile, in the absence of a declination hearing 5 ” (emphasis added) (quoting In re Boot, 130 Wn.2d 553 , 565 n.7, 925 P.2d 964 (1996))); id. (“adult criminal court lacks jurisdiction if juvenile court improperly declined juvenile offender” (emphasis added) (citing State v. Pritchard, 79 Wn.	2	2004–2004
State v. Cornejo green wash · 1996 2 sentences 2004Mora, 138 Wn.2d at 53 (“ ‘the adult court determined the statutory criteria for its “exclusive original jurisdiction” . . . were not met, the court would lack jurisdiction over the juvenile, in the absence of a declination hearing 5 ” (emphasis added) (quoting In re Boot, 130 Wn.2d 553 , 565 n.7, 925 P.2d 964 (1996))); id. (“adult criminal court lacks jurisdiction if juvenile court improperly declined juvenile offender” (emphasis added) (citing State v. Pritchard, 79 Wn. 2004Mora, 138 Wash.2d at 53 , 977 P.2d 564 ("`the adult court determined the statutory criteria for its "exclusive original jurisdiction"... were not met, the court would lack jurisdiction over the juvenile, in the absence of a declination hearing'" (emphasis added) (quoting In re Boot, 130 Wash.2d 553 , 565 n. 7, 925 P.2d 964 (1996))); id. at 53, 977 P.2d 564 ("adult criminal court lacks jurisdiction if juvenile court improperly declined juvenile offender" (emphasis added) (citing State v. Pritchard, 79 Wash.App. 14, 20 , 900 P.2d 560 (1995))).	2	2004–2004
State v. Jefferson green wash · 2018 1 sentence 2025Under the objective observer standard, “the relevant question is whether ‘an objective observer could view race or ethnicity as a factor.’ ” State v. Zamora, 199 Wn.2d 698 , 718, 512 P.3d 512 (2022) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting State v. Jefferson, 192 Wn.2d 225 , 249, 429 P.3d 467 (2018)).	1	2025–2025
In Re Personal Restraint Petition of Dalluge green wash · 2004 2 sentences 2025Restraint Petition of Dalluge, 152 Wn.2d 772, 782 , 100 P.3d 279 (2004). 3 No. 86360-6-I/4 During the Dillenburg hearing, in addition to hearing from both parties, the court heard testimony from Dr. Heather Evans, a psychologist retained by Quijas, who prepared a report (hereafter referred to as the “Evans Report”) concerning the relationship between race and discretionary decline. 2025Restraint Petition of Dalluge, 152 Wn.2d 772, 782 , 100 P.3d 279 (2004). 3 No. 86360-6-I/4 During the Dillenburg hearing, in addition to hearing from both parties, the court heard testimony from Dr. Heather Evans, a psychologist retained by Quijas, who prepared a report (hereafter referred to as the “Evans Report”) concerning the relationship between race and discretionary decline.	1	2025–2025
Kent v. United States green scotus · 1966 2 sentences 2015Thus, moving a case from juvenile court to adult court is "a 'critically important' action determining vitally important statutory rights of the juvenile." Kent, 383 U.S. at 556 , (citing Black v. United States, 122 U.S. App. D.C. 393 , 355 F.2d 104, 105 (1965)). 12 No. 32063-4-111 State v. Dalluge By contrast, an adult being provided retroactive relief through a Dillenburg hearing has already been prosecuted in adult court. 2015Thus, moving a case from juvenile court to adult court is "a 'critically important' action determining vitally important statutory rights of the juvenile." Kent, 383 U.S. at 556 , (citing Black v. United States, 122 U.S. App. D.C. 393 , 355 F.2d 104, 105 (1965)). 12 No. 32063-4-111 State v. Dalluge By contrast, an adult being provided retroactive relief through a Dillenburg hearing has already been prosecuted in adult court.	1	2015–2015
State v. Mora green wash · 1999 2 sentences 2004Mora, 138 Wash.2d at 53 , 977 P.2d 564 ("`the adult court determined the statutory criteria for its "exclusive original jurisdiction"... were not met, the court would lack jurisdiction over the juvenile, in the absence of a declination hearing'" (emphasis added) (quoting In re Boot, 130 Wash.2d 553 , 565 n. 7, 925 P.2d 964 (1996))); id. at 53, 977 P.2d 564 ("adult criminal court lacks jurisdiction if juvenile court improperly declined juvenile offender" (emphasis added) (citing State v. Pritchard, 79 Wash.App. 14, 20 , 900 P.2d 560 (1995))). 2004Mora, 138 Wash.2d at 53 , 977 P.2d 564 ("`the adult court determined the statutory criteria for its "exclusive original jurisdiction"... were not met, the court would lack jurisdiction over the juvenile, in the absence of a declination hearing'" (emphasis added) (quoting In re Boot, 130 Wash.2d 553 , 565 n. 7, 925 P.2d 964 (1996))); id. at 53, 977 P.2d 564 ("adult criminal court lacks jurisdiction if juvenile court improperly declined juvenile offender" (emphasis added) (citing State v. Pritchard, 79 Wash.App. 14, 20 , 900 P.2d 560 (1995))).	1	2004–2004
Evitts v. Lucey green scotus · 1985 2 sentences 2004Evitts v. Lucey, 469 U.S. 387, 396 , 105 S.Ct. 830 , 83 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985). 2004Evitts v. Lucey, 469 U.S. 387, 396 , 105 S.Ct. 830 , 83 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985).	1	2004–2004

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 13.04.030 (7) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 13.40.110 (7) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94A.030 (4) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 10.73.090 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check