9 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cazier v. Stategreen2 sentences2008Lessard v. State, 2007 WY 89, ¶ 14 , 158 P.3d 698, 702 (Wyo.2007); Cazier v. State, 2006 WY 153, ¶ 10 , 148 P.3d 23, 28 (Wyo.2006); Ogden v. State, 2001 WY 109, ¶ 9 , 34 P.3d 271, 274 (Wyo.2001). 2008Lessard v. State, 2007 WY 89, ¶ 14 , 158 P.3d 698, 702 (Wyo.2007); Cazier v. State, 2006 WY 153, ¶ 10 , 148 P.3d 23, 28 (Wyo.2006); Ogden v. State, 2001 WY 109, ¶ 9 , 34 P.3d 271, 274 (Wyo.2001). | 2 | 2 |
Lessard v. Stategreen2 sentences2008Lessard v. State, 2007 WY 89, ¶ 14 , 158 P.3d 698, 702 (Wyo.2007); Cazier v. State, 2006 WY 153, ¶ 10 , 148 P.3d 23, 28 (Wyo.2006); Ogden v. State, 2001 WY 109, ¶ 9 , 34 P.3d 271, 274 (Wyo.2001). 2008Lessard v. State, 2007 WY 89, ¶ 14 , 158 P.3d 698, 702 (Wyo.2007); Cazier v. State, 2006 WY 153, ¶ 10 , 148 P.3d 23, 28 (Wyo.2006); Ogden v. State, 2001 WY 109, ¶ 9 , 34 P.3d 271, 274 (Wyo.2001). | 2 | 2 |
Ogden v. Stategreen2 sentences2008Lessard v. State, 2007 WY 89, ¶ 14 , 158 P.3d 698, 702 (Wyo.2007); Cazier v. State, 2006 WY 153, ¶ 10 , 148 P.3d 23, 28 (Wyo.2006); Ogden v. State, 2001 WY 109, ¶ 9 , 34 P.3d 271, 274 (Wyo.2001). 2008Lessard v. State, 2007 WY 89, ¶ 14 , 158 P.3d 698, 702 (Wyo.2007); Cazier v. State, 2006 WY 153, ¶ 10 , 148 P.3d 23, 28 (Wyo.2006); Ogden v. State, 2001 WY 109, ¶ 9 , 34 P.3d 271, 274 (Wyo.2001). | 2 | 2 |
Osterling v. Stategreen1 sentence2018See id. (citing Watts v. State , 2016 WY 40 , ¶ 6, 370 P.3d 104 , 106 (Wyo. 2016) ). [¶93] As to the third element-material prejudice to the defendant-our cases have been inconsistent. | 1 | 1 |
Ernest Ray Watts v. Stategreen2 sentences2018See id. (citing Watts v. State , 2016 WY 40 , ¶ 6, 370 P.3d 104 , 106 (Wyo. 2016) ). [¶93] As to the third element-material prejudice to the defendant-our cases have been inconsistent. 2018See id. (citing Watts v. State , 2016 WY 40 , ¶ 6, 370 P.3d 104 , 106 (Wyo. 2016) ). [¶93] As to the third element-material prejudice to the defendant-our cases have been inconsistent. | 1 | 1 |
Kyle Joseph Anderson v. The State of Wyominggreen2 sentences2017Anderson v. State, 2014 WY 74, ¶ 40 , 327 P.3d 89, 99 (Wyo. 2014). 2017Anderson v. State, 2014 WY 74, ¶ 40 , 327 P.3d 89, 99 (Wyo. 2014). | 1 | 1 |
Jones v. Stategreen2 sentences2014Jones v. State, 2011 WY 114, ¶ 10 , 256 P.3d 527, 532 (Wyo.2011); Granger, ¶ 19, 193 P.3d at 272 . [112] Plain error is established only when 1) the record clearly reflects the error, 2) there was a transgression of a clear and unequivocal rule of law, and 3) the party claiming error was denied a substantial right which materially prejudiced him. 2014Jones v. State, 2011 WY 114, ¶ 10 , 256 P.3d 527, 532 (Wyo.2011); Granger, ¶ 19, 193 P.3d at 272 . [112] Plain error is established only when 1) the record clearly reflects the error, 2) there was a transgression of a clear and unequivocal rule of law, and 3) the party claiming error was denied a substantial right which materially prejudiced him. | 1 | 1 |
Vigil v. Stategreen1 sentence2012Causey v. State, 2009 WY 111, ¶ 18 , 215 P.3d 287, 293 (Wyo.2009); Vigil v. State, 859 P.2d 659, 662 (Wyo.1993); In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 361 , 90 S.Ct. 1068, 1071 , 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970). | 1 | 1 |
Causey v. Stategreen2 sentences2012Causey v. State, 2009 WY 111, ¶ 18 , 215 P.3d 287, 293 (Wyo.2009); Vigil v. State, 859 P.2d 659, 662 (Wyo.1993); In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 361 , 90 S.Ct. 1068, 1071 , 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970). 2012Causey v. State, 2009 WY 111, ¶ 18 , 215 P.3d 287, 293 (Wyo.2009); Vigil v. State, 859 P.2d 659, 662 (Wyo.1993); In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 361 , 90 S.Ct. 1068, 1071 , 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970). | 1 | 1 |
Dawes v. Stategreen2 sentences2010Dawes v. State, 2010 WY 113, ¶ 30 , 236 P.3d 303, 310 (Wyo.2010). [125] Mr. Dougherty contends that the district court erred in defining "obscene or indecent act" in Instruction No. 11, as follows: An "obscene" or "indecent" act means an act which is not decent; not conforming to generally accepted standards of morality; tending toward or being in fact something generally viewed as morally indelicate or improper or offensive; or calculated to shock the moral sense of man by a disregard of chastity or modesty. [126] Given the record clearly reflects this instruction, we turn to the determinatio 2010Dawes v. State, 2010 WY 113, ¶ 30 , 236 P.3d 303, 310 (Wyo.2010). [125] Mr. Dougherty contends that the district court erred in defining "obscene or indecent act" in Instruction No. 11, as follows: An "obscene" or "indecent" act means an act which is not decent; not conforming to generally accepted standards of morality; tending toward or being in fact something generally viewed as morally indelicate or improper or offensive; or calculated to shock the moral sense of man by a disregard of chastity or modesty. [126] Given the record clearly reflects this instruction, we turn to the determinatio | 1 | 1 |
Mazurek v. Stategreen1 sentence2003Dysthe v. State, 2008 WY 20, ¶ 23 , 63 P.3d 875, 884 (Wyo.2003) (quoting Mazurek v. State, 10 P.3d 531, 585 (Wyo.2000)). [T11] Abeyta argues in his appellate brief that this questioning "was an obvious attempt by the prosecutor to elicit testimony suggesting ... | 1 | 1 |
Dysthe v. Stategreen1 sentence2003Dysthe v. State, 2008 WY 20, ¶ 23 , 63 P.3d 875, 884 (Wyo.2003) (quoting Mazurek v. State, 10 P.3d 531, 585 (Wyo.2000)). [T11] Abeyta argues in his appellate brief that this questioning "was an obvious attempt by the prosecutor to elicit testimony suggesting ... | 1 | 1 |
Seymour v. Stategreen2 sentences2002Id. at ¶ 16, 17 P.3d at 721 ; Seymour v. State, 949 P.2d 881, 883 (Wyo.1997). 2002Id. at ¶ 16, 17 P.3d at 721 ; Seymour v. State, 949 P.2d 881, 883 (Wyo.1997). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Granzer v. State
green
1 sentence2014Jones v. State, 2011 WY 114, ¶ 10 , 256 P.3d 527, 532 (Wyo.2011); Granger, ¶ 19, 193 P.3d at 272 . [112] Plain error is established only when 1) the record clearly reflects the error, 2) there was a transgression of a clear and unequivocal rule of law, and 3) the party claiming error was denied a substantial right which materially prejudiced him. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
In Re WINSHIP
green
2 sentences2012Causey v. State, 2009 WY 111, ¶ 18 , 215 P.3d 287, 293 (Wyo.2009); Vigil v. State, 859 P.2d 659, 662 (Wyo.1993); In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 361 , 90 S.Ct. 1068, 1071 , 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970). 2012Causey v. State, 2009 WY 111, ¶ 18 , 215 P.3d 287, 293 (Wyo.2009); Vigil v. State, 859 P.2d 659, 662 (Wyo.1993); In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 361 , 90 S.Ct. 1068, 1071 , 25 L.Ed.2d 368 (1970). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Baker v. Speaks
green
1 sentence2003Dysthe v. State, 2008 WY 20, ¶ 23 , 63 P.3d 875, 884 (Wyo.2003) (quoting Mazurek v. State, 10 P.3d 531, 585 (Wyo.2000)). [T11] Abeyta argues in his appellate brief that this questioning "was an obvious attempt by the prosecutor to elicit testimony suggesting ... | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Taylor v. State
green
2 sentences2002Id. at ¶ 16, 17 P.3d at 721 ; Seymour v. State, 949 P.2d 881, 883 (Wyo.1997). 2002Id. at ¶ 16, 17 P.3d at 721 ; Seymour v. State, 949 P.2d 881, 883 (Wyo.1997). | 1 | 2002–2002 |