8 Arizona opinions name it 1 courts 1990–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jones v. Burkgreen2 sentences2021See Jones v. Burk, 164 Ariz. 595, 597 (App. 1990) (“Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief constitute waiver of error on review.”). 2021See Jones v. Burk, 164 Ariz. 595, 597 (App. 1990) (“Issues not clearly raised and argued in a party’s appellate brief constitute waiver of error on review.”). | 7 | 7 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gillard v. Estrella Dells I Improvement District
green
2 sentences1990Rules Sup.Ct., Rule 5(b) and Rule 101; Gillard v. Estrella Dells I Improvement District, 25 Ariz.App. 141 , 541 P.2d 932 (1975); State v. Scofield, 7 Ariz. App. 307 , 438 P.2d 776 (1968). 1990Rules Sup.Ct., Rule 5(b) and Rule 101; Gillard v. Estrella Dells I Improvement District, 25 Ariz.App. 141 , 541 P.2d 932 (1975); State v. Scofield, 7 Ariz. App. 307 , 438 P.2d 776 (1968). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Scofield
green
2 sentences1990Rules Sup.Ct., Rule 5(b) and Rule 101; Gillard v. Estrella Dells I Improvement District, 25 Ariz.App. 141 , 541 P.2d 932 (1975); State v. Scofield, 7 Ariz. App. 307 , 438 P.2d 776 (1968). 1990Rules Sup.Ct., Rule 5(b) and Rule 101; Gillard v. Estrella Dells I Improvement District, 25 Ariz.App. 141 , 541 P.2d 932 (1975); State v. Scofield, 7 Ariz. App. 307 , 438 P.2d 776 (1968). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.