8 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Nirschelgreen2 sentences2013See State v. Nirschel, 155 Ariz. 206, 208 , 745 P.2d 953, 955 (1987) ("Failure to argue a claim constitutes abandonment and waiver of that issue.”). 4 . 2013See State v. Nirschel, 155 Ariz. 206, 208 , 745 P.2d 953, 955 (1987) ("Failure to argue a claim constitutes abandonment and waiver of that issue.”). 4 . | 3 | 3 |
State v. McCallgreen2 sentences2017See State v. McCall, 139 Ariz. 147, 163 , 677 P.2d 920 (1983) (explaining that a party’s failure to argue a claim constitutes abandonment and waiver of the claim); Christina G. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ. 2017See State v. McCall, 139 Ariz. 147, 163 , 677 P.2d 920 (1983) (explaining that a party’s failure to argue a claim constitutes abandonment and waiver of the claim); Christina G. v. Ariz. Dep’t of Econ. | 2 | 3 |
State v. Carvergreen2 sentences2018See State v. Carver, 160 Ariz. 167, 175 (1989) ("opening briefs must present significant arguments, supported by authority"; failure to properly argue a claim constitutes abandonment and waiver). 3 2015P. 31.13(c)(1)(vi) (“The appellant’s brief shall include . . . the proper standard of review . . . with citations to relevant authority, at the outset of the discussion of that contention.”); State v. Carver, 160 Ariz. 167, 175 , 771 P.2d 1382, 1390 (1989) (citing Rule 31.13 and providing that failure to argue a claim constitutes abandonment and waiver of the claim); State v. Moreno-Medrano, 218 Ariz. 349 , 354 ¶ 17, 185 P.3d 135, 140 (App. 2008) (concluding that because the defendant did not argue that the alleged error was fundamental, the argument was waived). ¶29 Regardless of the waiver, | 2 | 2 |
State v. Moodygreen2 sentences2015See State v. Moody, 208 Ariz. 424 , 452 ¶ 101 n.9, 94 P.3d 1119 , 1147 n.9 (2004) (providing that failure to argue a claim constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim). ¶9 Regardless of the waiver, as best we understand Maisano’s argument and to the extent that the complaint asserts federal claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , the trial court did not err in dismissing the complaint for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. 2015See State v. Moody, 208 Ariz. 424 , 452 ¶ 101 n.9, 94 P.3d 1119 , 1147 n.9 (2004) (providing that failure to argue a claim constitutes abandonment and waiver of that claim). ¶9 Regardless of the waiver, as best we understand Maisano’s argument and to the extent that the complaint asserts federal claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , the trial court did not err in dismissing the complaint for lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Nelsongreen2 sentences2015P. 31.13(c)(1)(vi) (“The appellant’s brief shall include . . . the proper standard of review . . . with citations to relevant authority, at the outset of the discussion of that contention.”); State v. Carver, 160 Ariz. 167, 175 , 771 P.2d 1382, 1390 (1989) (citing Rule 31.13 and providing that failure to argue a claim constitutes abandonment and waiver of the claim); State v. Moreno-Medrano, 218 Ariz. 349 , 354 ¶ 17, 185 P.3d 135, 140 (App. 2008) (concluding that because the defendant did not argue that the alleged error was fundamental, the argument was waived). ¶29 Regardless of the waiver, 2015P. 31.13(c)(1)(vi) (“The appellant’s brief shall include . . . the proper standard of review . . . with citations to relevant authority, at the outset of the discussion of that contention.”); State v. Carver, 160 Ariz. 167, 175 , 771 P.2d 1382, 1390 (1989) (citing Rule 31.13 and providing that failure to argue a claim constitutes abandonment and waiver of the claim); State v. Moreno-Medrano, 218 Ariz. 349 , 354 ¶ 17, 185 P.3d 135, 140 (App. 2008) (concluding that because the defendant did not argue that the alleged error was fundamental, the argument was waived). ¶29 Regardless of the waiver, | 1 | 1 |
State v. Williamsgreen2 sentences2015P. 31.13(c)(1)(vi) (“The appellant’s brief shall include . . . the proper standard of review . . . with citations to relevant authority, at the outset of the discussion of that contention.”); State v. Carver, 160 Ariz. 167, 175 , 771 P.2d 1382, 1390 (1989) (citing Rule 31.13 and providing that failure to argue a claim constitutes abandonment and waiver of the claim); State v. Moreno-Medrano, 218 Ariz. 349 , 354 ¶ 17, 185 P.3d 135, 140 (App. 2008) (concluding that because the defendant did not argue that the alleged error was fundamental, the argument was waived). ¶29 Regardless of the waiver, 2015P. 31.13(c)(1)(vi) (“The appellant’s brief shall include . . . the proper standard of review . . . with citations to relevant authority, at the outset of the discussion of that contention.”); State v. Carver, 160 Ariz. 167, 175 , 771 P.2d 1382, 1390 (1989) (citing Rule 31.13 and providing that failure to argue a claim constitutes abandonment and waiver of the claim); State v. Moreno-Medrano, 218 Ariz. 349 , 354 ¶ 17, 185 P.3d 135, 140 (App. 2008) (concluding that because the defendant did not argue that the alleged error was fundamental, the argument was waived). ¶29 Regardless of the waiver, | 1 | 1 |
State v. Moreno-Medranogreen2 sentences2015P. 31.13(c)(1)(vi) (“The appellant’s brief shall include . . . the proper standard of review . . . with citations to relevant authority, at the outset of the discussion of that contention.”); State v. Carver, 160 Ariz. 167, 175 , 771 P.2d 1382, 1390 (1989) (citing Rule 31.13 and providing that failure to argue a claim constitutes abandonment and waiver of the claim); State v. Moreno-Medrano, 218 Ariz. 349 , 354 ¶ 17, 185 P.3d 135, 140 (App. 2008) (concluding that because the defendant did not argue that the alleged error was fundamental, the argument was waived). ¶29 Regardless of the waiver, 2015P. 31.13(c)(1)(vi) (“The appellant’s brief shall include . . . the proper standard of review . . . with citations to relevant authority, at the outset of the discussion of that contention.”); State v. Carver, 160 Ariz. 167, 175 , 771 P.2d 1382, 1390 (1989) (citing Rule 31.13 and providing that failure to argue a claim constitutes abandonment and waiver of the claim); State v. Moreno-Medrano, 218 Ariz. 349 , 354 ¶ 17, 185 P.3d 135, 140 (App. 2008) (concluding that because the defendant did not argue that the alleged error was fundamental, the argument was waived). ¶29 Regardless of the waiver, | 1 | 1 |
State v. Detrichgreen2 sentences2004State v. Det-rich, 188 Ariz. 57, 64 , 932 P.2d 1328, 1335 (1997) (Defendant waived issue "by failing to sufficiently argue this claim on appeal.”); State v. Nirschel, 155 Ariz. 206, 208 , 745 P.2d 953, 955 (1987) (“Failure to argue a claim constitutes abandonment and waiver of that issue.” (citing State v. McCall, 139 Ariz. 147, 163 , 677 P.2d 920, 936 (1983))). 2004State v. Det-rich, 188 Ariz. 57, 64 , 932 P.2d 1328, 1335 (1997) (Defendant waived issue "by failing to sufficiently argue this claim on appeal.”); State v. Nirschel, 155 Ariz. 206, 208 , 745 P.2d 953, 955 (1987) (“Failure to argue a claim constitutes abandonment and waiver of that issue.” (citing State v. McCall, 139 Ariz. 147, 163 , 677 P.2d 920, 936 (1983))). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Christina G. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
green
2 sentences2017Sec., 227 Ariz. 231, 234 , ¶ 14 n.6, 256 P.3d 628 (App. 2011) (l’ecognizing that the failure to develop an argument on appeal usually results in abandonment and waiver of the issue). 2017Sec., 227 Ariz. 231, 234 , ¶ 14 n.6, 256 P.3d 628 (App. 2011) (l’ecognizing that the failure to develop an argument on appeal usually results in abandonment and waiver of the issue). | 1 | 2017–2017 |