8 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Stategreen2 sentences2006Doe v. State, 200 Ariz. 174, 176, ¶ 4 , 24 P.3d 1269, 1271 (2001) ("[A]s this court has emphasized, governmental liability is the rule in Arizona and immunity is the exception. . . . 2006Doe v. State, 200 Ariz. 174, 176, ¶ 4 , 24 P.3d 1269, 1271 (2001) ("[A]s this court has emphasized, governmental liability is the rule in Arizona and immunity is the exception. . . . | 4 | 5 |
Fidelity Security Life Insurance v. Stategreen2 sentences2010Co. v. State Dep’t of Ins., 191 Ariz. 222, 225, ¶ 7 , 954 P.2d 580, 583 (1998) (stating that “liability of public servants is the rule in Arizona and immunity is the exception”). ¶ 27 The State next argues that APSA is modeled after racketeering laws and because such laws provide that claims may not be brought against the State, we should interpret APSA in a similar’ fashion. 2010Co. v. State Dep’t of Ins., 191 Ariz. 222, 225, ¶ 7 , 954 P.2d 580, 583 (1998) (stating that “liability of public servants is the rule in Arizona and immunity is the exception”). ¶ 27 The State next argues that APSA is modeled after racketeering laws and because such laws provide that claims may not be brought against the State, we should interpret APSA in a similar’ fashion. | 1 | 2 |
Stone v. Arizona Highway Commissiongreen2 sentences1998See City of Tucson v. Fahringer, 164 Ariz. 599, 600 , 795 P.2d 819, 820 (1990) (quoting Ryan v. State, 134 Ariz. 308 , 656 P.2d 597 (1982)); Stone v. Arizona Highway Comm’n, 93 Ariz. 384, 892 , 381 P.2d 107, 112 (1963). 1998See City of Tucson v. Fahringer, 164 Ariz. 599, 600 , 795 P.2d 819, 820 (1990) (quoting Ryan v. State, 134 Ariz. 308 , 656 P.2d 597 (1982)); Stone v. Arizona Highway Comm’n, 93 Ariz. 384, 892 , 381 P.2d 107, 112 (1963). | 1 | 1 |
City of Tucson v. Fahringergreen2 sentences1998See City of Tucson v. Fahringer, 164 Ariz. 599, 600 , 795 P.2d 819, 820 (1990) (quoting Ryan v. State, 134 Ariz. 308 , 656 P.2d 597 (1982)); Stone v. Arizona Highway Comm’n, 93 Ariz. 384, 892 , 381 P.2d 107, 112 (1963). 1998See City of Tucson v. Fahringer, 164 Ariz. 599, 600 , 795 P.2d 819, 820 (1990) (quoting Ryan v. State, 134 Ariz. 308 , 656 P.2d 597 (1982)); Stone v. Arizona Highway Comm’n, 93 Ariz. 384, 892 , 381 P.2d 107, 112 (1963). | 1 | 1 |
Ryan v. Statered2 sentences1998See City of Tucson v. Fahringer, 164 Ariz. 599, 600 , 795 P.2d 819, 820 (1990) (quoting Ryan v. State, 134 Ariz. 308 , 656 P.2d 597 (1982)); Stone v. Arizona Highway Comm’n, 93 Ariz. 384, 892 , 381 P.2d 107, 112 (1963). 1998See City of Tucson v. Fahringer, 164 Ariz. 599, 600 , 795 P.2d 819, 820 (1990) (quoting Ryan v. State, 134 Ariz. 308 , 656 P.2d 597 (1982)); Stone v. Arizona Highway Comm’n, 93 Ariz. 384, 892 , 381 P.2d 107, 112 (1963). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Schabel v. DEER VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL
green
2 sentences2024No. 97, 186 Ariz. 161 , 163 (App. 1996). “[G]overnmental liability is the rule in Arizona and immunity is the exception,” and we “construe immunity provisions narrowly.” Doe ex rel. 2024No. 97, 186 Ariz. 161 , 163 (App. 1996). “[G]overnmental liability is the rule in Arizona and immunity is the exception,” and we “construe immunity provisions narrowly.” Doe ex rel. | 2 | 2024–2024 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.