8 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1987–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Howardgreen2 sentences1987App. 3d 138, 142 , 392 N.E.2d 775 .) Because the outcome of the fitness hearing may have been different had defense counsel investigated defendant’s mental condition and history and because such investigation may have led him to assert an insanity defense at trial ( 74 Ill. 1987App. 3d 138, 142 , 392 N.E.2d 775 .) Because the outcome of the fitness hearing may have been different had defense counsel investigated defendant’s mental condition and history and because such investigation may have led him to assert an insanity defense at trial ( 74 Ill. | 1 | 2 |
People v. Johnsongreen1 sentence2024Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694 . “ ‘Satisfying the prejudice prong necessitates a showing of actual prejudice, not simply speculation that defendant may have been prejudiced.’ ” People v. Johnson, 2021 IL 126291, ¶ 55 (quoting People v. Patterson, 2014 IL 115102, ¶ 81 ). ¶ 41 In conclusory fashion, defendant argues his testimony would have likely changed the outcome of the fitness hearing. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Ernie C.green1 sentence2019See In re April C., 326 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Murphy
green
2 sentences2020The Murphy court concluded that prejudice had been established because “the outcome of the fitness hearing may have been different had defense counsel investigated defendant’s mental condition and history and because such investigation may have led him to assert an insanity defense at trial.” (Emphasis added.) Id. at 790 . ¶ 36 Here, in contrast, defense counsel never indicated that he had concerns regarding defendant’s fitness. 2020Murphy, 160 Ill. | 2 | 2002–2020 |
People v. Haynes
green
2 sentences2014In dicta, the Haynes court noted that the defendant also "failed to establish that this evidence would have changed the outcome of the fitness hearing." 17 Haynes, 192 Ill. 2d at 463 , 737 N.E.2d at 184 . 2014In dicta, the Haynes court noted that the defendant also "failed to establish that this evidence would have changed the outcome of the fitness hearing." 17 Haynes, 192 Ill. 2d at 463 , 737 N.E.2d at 184 . | 2 | 2014–2014 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
1 sentence2024Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694 . “ ‘Satisfying the prejudice prong necessitates a showing of actual prejudice, not simply speculation that defendant may have been prejudiced.’ ” People v. Johnson, 2021 IL 126291, ¶ 55 (quoting People v. Patterson, 2014 IL 115102, ¶ 81 ). ¶ 41 In conclusory fashion, defendant argues his testimony would have likely changed the outcome of the fitness hearing. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Patterson
green
1 sentence2024Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694 . “ ‘Satisfying the prejudice prong necessitates a showing of actual prejudice, not simply speculation that defendant may have been prejudiced.’ ” People v. Johnson, 2021 IL 126291, ¶ 55 (quoting People v. Patterson, 2014 IL 115102, ¶ 81 ). ¶ 41 In conclusory fashion, defendant argues his testimony would have likely changed the outcome of the fitness hearing. | 1 | 2024–2024 |