petition advancing claim (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

petition advancing claim in Illinois

8 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2024 6 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Boclairgreen
ill · 2002 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022Id. ¶ 16 Culpable negligence is “something greater than ordinary negligence and is akin to recklessness.” People v. Boclair, 202 Ill. 2d 89, 102 (2002).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Johnson green
ill · 2017
2 sentences

2024If a petition for certiorari is not filed, no proceedings under this Article shall be commenced more than 6 months from the date for filing a certiorari petition, unless the petitioner alleges facts showing that the delay was not due to his or her culpable negligence. *** This limitation does not apply to a petition advancing a claim of actual innocence.” 725 ILCS 5/122-1(c) (West 2020). ¶ 19 As our supreme court has explained: -4- “The United States Supreme Court only has jurisdiction to consider a petition for certiorari when an appeal has been taken to the state court of last resort. [Citat

2024If a petition for certiorari is not filed, no proceedings under this Article shall be commenced more than 6 months from the date for filing a certiorari petition, unless the petitioner alleges facts showing that the delay was not due to his or her culpable negligence. *** This limitation does not apply to a petition advancing a claim of actual innocence.” 725 ILCS 5/122-1(c) (West 2020). ¶ 19 As our supreme court has explained: -4- “The United States Supreme Court only has jurisdiction to consider a petition for certiorari when an appeal has been taken to the state court of last resort. [Citat

22020–2024
People v. Robinson green
ill · 2020
2 sentences

2024A claim of actual -6- innocence requires evidence that is “(1) newly discovered, (2) material and not cumulative, and (3) of such conclusive character that it would probably change the result on retrial.” People v. Robinson, 2020 IL 123849, ¶ 47 , 181 N.E.3d 37 .

2024A claim of actual -6- innocence requires evidence that is “(1) newly discovered, (2) material and not cumulative, and (3) of such conclusive character that it would probably change the result on retrial.” People v. Robinson, 2020 IL 123849, ¶ 47 , 181 N.E.3d 37 .

12024–2024
People v. Kirilyuk neutral
illappct · 2024
1 sentence

2024This limitation[s period] does not apply to a petition advancing a claim of actual innocence.” -9- 2024 IL App (2d) 230154 Defendant does not assert a claim of actual innocence.

12024–2024
People v. Jones green
illappct · 2011
1 sentence

2022But the statute adds, “This limitation does not apply to a petition advancing a claim of actual innocence.” Id.

12022–2022
People v. Pendleton green
ill · 2006
1 sentence

2022Id. ¶ 16 Culpable negligence is “something greater than ordinary negligence and is akin to recklessness.” People v. Boclair, 202 Ill. 2d 89, 102 (2002).

12022–2022
People v. Vincent green
ill · 2007
1 sentence

2021Defendant does not provide any authority creating such an exception. ¶ 24 To the contrary, our supreme court has made clear that “an action brought under section 2- 1401 is a civil proceeding and, according to this court’s long-standing precedent, is subject to the usual rules of civil practice, even when it is used to challenge a criminal conviction or sentence.” Vincent, 226 Ill. 2d at 6 .

12021–2021
People v. Perkins green
ill · 2008
1 sentence

2021Id.

12021–2021
People v. Harris green
ill · 2007
1 sentence

2015This limitation does not apply to a petition advancing a claim of actual innocence." (Emphasis added.) 725 ILCS 5/122- 1(c) (West 2008). ¶ 20 "The applicable statute of limitations for a postconviction petition is the one in effect at the time the petition is filed." People v. Harris, 224 Ill. 2d 115 , 125 n.1 (2007).

12015–2015

Statutes the citing opinions construe

IL § 725 ILCS 5/122-1 (8) IL § 725 ILCS 5/122-2.1 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check