8 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Terrygreen2 sentences2022People v. Terry, 99 Ill. 2d 508, 515 (1984). 2014People v. Terry, 99 Ill. 2d 508, 515 (1984). | 3 | 3 |
In Re WCgreen2 sentences2014Legal Accountability and the Common-Design Rule ¶ 21 Section 5-2(c) of the Criminal Code of 1961 (720 ILCS 5/5-2(c) (West 2006)) provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "A person is legally accountable for the conduct of another when: *** (c) Either before or during the -5- commission of an offense, and with the intent to promote or facilitate such commission, he solicits, aids, abets, agrees or attempts to aid, such other person in the planning or commission of the offense." ¶ 22 In the recent case of People v. Fernandez, 2014 IL 115527, ¶ 13 , 6 N.E.3d 145 , the supreme court reaffirmed "th 2014Legal Accountability and the Common-Design Rule ¶ 21 Section 5-2(c) of the Criminal Code of 1961 (720 ILCS 5/5-2(c) (West 2006)) provides, in pertinent part, as follows: "A person is legally accountable for the conduct of another when: *** (c) Either before or during the -5- commission of an offense, and with the intent to promote or facilitate such commission, he solicits, aids, abets, agrees or attempts to aid, such other person in the planning or commission of the offense." ¶ 22 In the recent case of People v. Fernandez, 2014 IL 115527, ¶ 13 , 6 N.E.3d 145 , the supreme court reaffirmed "th | 2 | 2 |
People v. Batchelorgreen1 sentence2022People v. Batchelor, 171 Ill. 2d 367, 376 (1996). ¶ 77 The intent of subsection (c) of the accountability statute is to incorporate the principle of the common-design rule. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Fernandez
green
2 sentences2016Accountability ¶ 21 Section 5-2(c) of the Criminal Code of 2012 (720 ILCS 5/5-2(c) (West 2012)) provides that a person is legally accountable for the criminal actions of another if “either before or during the commission of an offense, and with the intent to promote or facilitate that commission, he or she solicits, aids, abets, agrees, or attempts to aid that other person in the planning or commission of the offense.” Our supreme court recently reiterated “that the underlying intent of this statute is to incorporate the principle of the common-design rule.” Fernandez, 2014 IL 115527 , ¶ 13. 2016Accountability ¶ 21 Section 5-2(c) of the Criminal Code of 2012 (720 ILCS 5/5-2(c) (West 2012)) provides that a person is legally accountable for the criminal actions of another if “either before or during the commission of an offense, and with the intent to promote or facilitate that commission, he or she solicits, aids, abets, agrees, or attempts to aid that other person in the planning or commission of the offense.” Our supreme court recently reiterated “that the underlying intent of this statute is to incorporate the principle of the common-design rule.” Fernandez, 2014 IL 115527 , ¶ 13. | 4 | 2014–2016 |
People v. Kessler
green
2 sentences1984This court has consistently reiterated its support for the rule (People v. Kessler (1974), 57 Ill. 2d 493 ; People v. Rybka (1959), 16 Ill. 2d 394 ; Hamilton v. People (1885), 113 Ill. 34 ; Brennan v. People (1854), 15 Ill. 511 ), and we see no reason to depart from it at this time. 1984This court has consistently reiterated its support for the rule ( People v. Kessler (1974), 57 Ill.2d 493 ; People v. Rybka (1959), 16 Ill.2d 394 ; Hamilton v. People (1885), 113 Ill. 34 ; Brennan v. People (1854), 15 Ill. 511 ), and we see no reason to depart from it at this time. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
The People v. Rybka
green
2 sentences1984This court has consistently reiterated its support for the rule (People v. Kessler (1974), 57 Ill. 2d 493 ; People v. Rybka (1959), 16 Ill. 2d 394 ; Hamilton v. People (1885), 113 Ill. 34 ; Brennan v. People (1854), 15 Ill. 511 ), and we see no reason to depart from it at this time. 1984This court has consistently reiterated its support for the rule ( People v. Kessler (1974), 57 Ill.2d 493 ; People v. Rybka (1959), 16 Ill.2d 394 ; Hamilton v. People (1885), 113 Ill. 34 ; Brennan v. People (1854), 15 Ill. 511 ), and we see no reason to depart from it at this time. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Brennan v. People
green
2 sentences1984This court has consistently reiterated its support for the rule (People v. Kessler (1974), 57 Ill. 2d 493 ; People v. Rybka (1959), 16 Ill. 2d 394 ; Hamilton v. People (1885), 113 Ill. 34 ; Brennan v. People (1854), 15 Ill. 511 ), and we see no reason to depart from it at this time. 1984This court has consistently reiterated its support for the rule ( People v. Kessler (1974), 57 Ill.2d 493 ; People v. Rybka (1959), 16 Ill.2d 394 ; Hamilton v. People (1885), 113 Ill. 34 ; Brennan v. People (1854), 15 Ill. 511 ), and we see no reason to depart from it at this time. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Hamilton v. People
green
2 sentences1984This court has consistently reiterated its support for the rule (People v. Kessler (1974), 57 Ill. 2d 493 ; People v. Rybka (1959), 16 Ill. 2d 394 ; Hamilton v. People (1885), 113 Ill. 34 ; Brennan v. People (1854), 15 Ill. 511 ), and we see no reason to depart from it at this time. 1984This court has consistently reiterated its support for the rule ( People v. Kessler (1974), 57 Ill.2d 493 ; People v. Rybka (1959), 16 Ill.2d 394 ; Hamilton v. People (1885), 113 Ill. 34 ; Brennan v. People (1854), 15 Ill. 511 ), and we see no reason to depart from it at this time. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.