8 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hoodgreen2 sentences2006The new constitutional sentencing rule established by Apprendi applied to all cases pending on direct appeal or which were not yet final or which arose after the date Apprendi was decided. 271 Kan. at 414 (citing State v. Hood, 242 Kan. 115, 117 , 744 P.2d 816 [1987], quoting Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 327-28 , 93 L. 2006The new constitutional sentencing rule established by Apprendi applied to all cases pending on direct appeal or which were not yet final or which arose after the date Apprendi was decided. 271 Kan. at 414 (citing State v. Hood, 242 Kan. 115, 117 , 744 P.2d 816 [1987], quoting Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 327-28 , 93 L. | 2 | 3 |
State v. Gouldgreen2 sentences2017However, the new constitutional sentencing rule established by Apprendi must be applied here and in all cases pending on direct appeal or which are not yet final or which arose after June 26, 2000." State v. Gould, 271 Kan. 394, 414 , 23 P.3d 801 (2001). 2017However, the new constitutional sentencing rule established by Apprendi must be applied here and in all cases pending on direct appeal or which are not yet final or which arose after June 26, 2000." State v. Gould, 271 Kan. 394, 414 , 23 P.3d 801 (2001). | 1 | 7 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Thomas
green
2 sentences2017For instance, in State v. Thomas, 53 Kan. 2017For instance, in State v. Thomas, 53 Kan. | 2 | 2017–2017 |
Whisler v. State
green
1 sentence2006The court declined to apply the new constitutional sentencing rule retroactively on collateral review. 272 Kan. 864 , Syl. ¶¶ 1 and 2. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Griffith v. Kentucky
green
2 sentences2006The new constitutional sentencing rule established by Apprendi applied to all cases pending on direct appeal or which were not yet final or which arose after the date Apprendi was decided. 271 Kan. at 414 (citing State v. Hood, 242 Kan. 115, 117 , 744 P.2d 816 [1987], quoting Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 327-28 , 93 L. 2006The new constitutional sentencing rule established by Apprendi applied to all cases pending on direct appeal or which were not yet final or which arose after the date Apprendi was decided. 271 Kan. at 414 (citing State v. Hood, 242 Kan. 115, 117 , 744 P.2d 816 [1987], quoting Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 327-28 , 93 L. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.