8 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Maysgreen2 sentences2006If the instructions as a whole properly and fairly state the law as applied to the facts of the case, and the jury could not reasonably be misled by them, the instructions are not reversible error even if they are in some way erroneous. [Citation omitted.]” State v. Jackson, 280 Kan. 541, 549-50 , 124 P.3d 460 (2005); see State v. Mays, 277 Kan. 359, 378-79 , 85 P.3d 1208 (2004). 2006If the instructions as a whole properly and fairly state the law as applied to the facts of the case, and the jury could not reasonably be misled by them, the instructions are not reversible error even if they are in some way erroneous. [Citation omitted.]” State v. Jackson, 280 Kan. 541, 549-50 , 124 P.3d 460 (2005); see State v. Mays, 277 Kan. 359, 378-79 , 85 P.3d 1208 (2004). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Jackson
green
2 sentences2012If the instructions as a whole properly and fairly state the law as applied to the facts of the case, and the jury could not reasonably be mislead by them, the instructions are not reversible error even if they are in some way erroneous. [Citation omitted.]” State v. Jackson, 280 Kan. 541, 549-50 , 124 P.3d 460 (2005). 2012If the instructions as a whole properly and fairly state the law as applied to the facts of the case, and the jury could not reasonably be mislead by them, the instructions are not reversible error even if they are in some way erroneous. [Citation omitted.]” State v. Jackson, 280 Kan. 541, 549-50 , 124 P.3d 460 (2005). | 6 | 2006–2012 |
State v. McKissack
green
2 sentences2010State v. McKissack, 283 Kan. 721, 732 , 156 P.3d 1249 (2007). 2010State v. McKissack, 283 Kan. 721, 732 , 156 P.3d 1249 (2007). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Simmons
green
1 sentence2009If the instructions as a whole properly and fairly state the law as applied to the facts of the case, and the jury could not reasonably be misled by them, the instructions are not reversible error even if they are in some way erroneous. [Citation omitted.]’ State v. Jackson, 280 Kan. 541, 549-50 , 124 P.3d 460 (2005).” The necessity for an accomplice instruction arises when “a witness testifies that he or she was involved in the commission of the crime with which the defendant has been charged.” Simmons, 282 Kan. at 733 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Beach
green
1 sentence2005Beach, 275 Kan. at 624-25 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.