8 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Colemangreen2 sentences2010See State v. Coleman, 253 Kan. 335, 344 , 856 P.2d 121 (1993) ("It is well established that a party may not assert error based on the erroneous exclusion of evidence in the absence of a proffer of that excluded evidence."). 2010See State v. Coleman, 253 Kan. 335, 344 , 856 P.2d 121 (1993) ("It is well established that a party may not assert error based on the erroneous exclusion of evidence in the absence of a proffer of that excluded evidence."). | 1 | 4 |
State v. Hallred2 sentences1993See State v. Hall, 246 Kan. 728, 746 , 793 P.2d 737 (1990); State v. Nemechek, 223 Kan. 766, 770 , 576 P.2d 682 (1978); State v. Watkins, 219 Kan. 81, 85 , 547 P.2d 810 (1976). 1993See State v. Hall, 246 Kan. 728, 746 , 793 P.2d 737 (1990); State v. Nemechek, 223 Kan. 766, 770 , 576 P.2d 682 (1978); State v. Watkins, 219 Kan. 81, 85 , 547 P.2d 810 (1976). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Watkins
green
2 sentences1993See State v. Hall, 246 Kan. 728, 746 , 793 P.2d 737 (1990); State v. Nemechek, 223 Kan. 766, 770 , 576 P.2d 682 (1978); State v. Watkins, 219 Kan. 81, 85 , 547 P.2d 810 (1976). 1993See State v. Hall, 246 Kan. 728, 746 , 793 P.2d 737 (1990); State v. Nemechek, 223 Kan. 766, 770 , 576 P.2d 682 (1978); State v. Watkins, 219 Kan. 81, 85 , 547 P.2d 810 (1976). | 2 | 1978–1993 |
State v. Nix
green
2 sentences1978(K.S.A. 60-405; State v. Watkins, 219 Kan. 81 , 547 P.2d 810 [1976]; State v. Nix, 215 Kan. 880 , 529 P.2d 147 [1974].) Based on the limited evidence before us, we cannot state the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the evidence. 1978(K.S.A. 60-405; State v. Watkins, 219 Kan. 81 , 547 P.2d 810 [1976]; State v. Nix, 215 Kan. 880 , 529 P.2d 147 [1974].) Based on the limited evidence before us, we cannot state the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the evidence. | 2 | 1976–1978 |
McGinnes v. Wesley Medical Center
green
2 sentences2024It is well-settled that "'a party may not assert error based upon the erroneous exclusion of evidence in the absence of a proffer of that proposed evidence.'" McGinnes v. Wesley Medical Center, 43 Kan. 2024App. 2d 227, 238 , 224 P.3d 581 (2010). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Nemechek
green
2 sentences1993See State v. Hall, 246 Kan. 728, 746 , 793 P.2d 737 (1990); State v. Nemechek, 223 Kan. 766, 770 , 576 P.2d 682 (1978); State v. Watkins, 219 Kan. 81, 85 , 547 P.2d 810 (1976). 1993See State v. Hall, 246 Kan. 728, 746 , 793 P.2d 737 (1990); State v. Nemechek, 223 Kan. 766, 770 , 576 P.2d 682 (1978); State v. Watkins, 219 Kan. 81, 85 , 547 P.2d 810 (1976). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Salem v. Salem
green
2 sentences1976S. A. 60-405; State v. Nix, 215 Kan. 880 , 529 P. 2d 147 ; Salem v. Salem, 214 Kan. 828 , 522 P. 2d 336 ), and we cannot assign as error the trial court’s failure to hold a hearing on the admissibility of the polygraph examination. 1976S. A. 60-405; State v. Nix, 215 Kan. 880 , 529 P. 2d 147 ; Salem v. Salem, 214 Kan. 828 , 522 P. 2d 336 ), and we cannot assign as error the trial court’s failure to hold a hearing on the admissibility of the polygraph examination. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.