8 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 2012–2023 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ames v. Ohle
green
2 sentences2022App. 4 Cir. 5/23/12), 97 So.3d 386, 390-91 , this court set forth the standard of review applicable to a peremptory exception of prescription as follows: Ordinarily, a party asserting a peremptory exception of prescription bears the burden of proof. 2021App. 4 Cir. 5/23/12), 97 So.3d 386, 390-91 ) as follows: Ordinarily, a party asserting a peremptory exception of prescription bears the burden of proof. | 5 | 2015–2022 |
Trust for Schwegmann v. Schwegmann Family Trust
green
2 sentences2022Trust for Melba Margaret Schwegmann v. Schwegmann, 09–968, p. 8 (La.App. 5 Cir. 9/14/10), 51 So.3d 737, 742 . 2012Trust for Melba Margaret Schwegmann v. Schwegmann, 09-968, p. 8 (La.App. 5 Cir. 9/14/10), 51 So.3d 737, 742 . | 2 | 2012–2022 |
Boulmay v. Heebe
neutral
1 sentence2023App. 4 Cir. 12/27/17), 238 So.3d 459, 462 , this Court reiterated the standard of review relative to peremptory exceptions of prescription as follows: Ordinarily, a party asserting a peremptory exception of prescription bears the burden of proof. | 1 | 2023–2023 |