8 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1993–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Gattigreen1 sentence2011See also State v. Gatti, 39,833, pp. 15-17 (La.App. 2 Cir. 10/13/05) , 914 So.2d 74, 88-89 , writ denied, 05-2394 (La.4/17/06), 926 So.2d 511 , where the Second Circuit found no error in the denial of a challenge for cause of a prospective juror who stated that she thought the defendant was probably guilty because "he wouldn't be in court had [he] not done something wrong.” The court noted that the opinion the defendant had "done something wrong” was not equivalent with the opinion the defendant was guilty of the charged offense. | 1 | 1 |
Succession of Crawfordgreen1 sentence2011See also State v. Gatti, 39,833, pp. 15-17 (La.App. 2 Cir. 10/13/05) , 914 So.2d 74, 88-89 , writ denied, 05-2394 (La.4/17/06), 926 So.2d 511 , where the Second Circuit found no error in the denial of a challenge for cause of a prospective juror who stated that she thought the defendant was probably guilty because "he wouldn't be in court had [he] not done something wrong.” The court noted that the opinion the defendant had "done something wrong” was not equivalent with the opinion the defendant was guilty of the charged offense. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Johnsongreen1 sentence1993Id.; See, State v. Johnson, 469 So.2d 1099 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1985) in which the Second Circuit found no error by the trial court in denying defendant's challenge for cause to a juror who, on voir dire, initially stated that he would be generally inclined to give greater weight to the testimony of a deputy sheriff then to that of a lay witness. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Johnson v. City of Winnfield
neutral
2 sentences2019Id. at 437-38 . 2019Id. at 437-38 . | 3 | 2010–2019 |
In Re Succession of Wright
green
1 sentence2015In Succession of Wright, 855 So.2d at 928 , the second circuit cited Succession of Knox , and reiterated that “[a]n action for nullity of a judgment of possession is not such a succession proceeding as contemplated in [La.Code Civ.P. art. 561(A)(1),] and is subject to the three year abandonment rule.” The court went on to opine: “The exception in [La.Code Civ.P.] art. 561 applies to uncontested opened successions and recognizes that uncontested proceedings may remain open for years while assets are collected and managed. ■ There is no Isprosecution or defense under these circumstances. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Cox v. O'Brien
neutral
1 sentence2015The second circuit found no error in the trial court’s |8award of sanctions, noting that the attorney had “the opportunity to present an argument regarding the imposition of the sanction[.]” Id. at -. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Hight
green
1 sentence2004Conversely, in State v. Hight, 35,621 (La.App. 2 Cir. 3/1/02), 810 So.2d 1250, 1258 , writ denied, 02-1181 (La.11/22/02), 829 So.2d 1036 , the Second Circuit found no error when the trial court allowed the State to present additional testimony after it had rested. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Hight
green
1 sentence2004Conversely, in State v. Hight, 35,621 (La.App. 2 Cir. 3/1/02), 810 So.2d 1250, 1258 , writ denied, 02-1181 (La.11/22/02), 829 So.2d 1036 , the Second Circuit found no error when the trial court allowed the State to present additional testimony after it had rested. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.