8 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 2014–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Miller-El v. Dretkegreen2 sentences2021But when we are not left with a definite and firm conviction that the trial court made proposition taken in the opinion to reverse: that we can ignore the deferential standard of review appellate courts have long given to trial court findings on the issue of discriminatory intent in the context of a Batson challenge. 56 See Miller-El, 545 US at 244 (explaining that considerations applicable to this fact- finding process include statements by the prosecutor that “mischaracterized [the] testimony” regarding the excused prospective juror’s views). 28 a mistake, a mixed record is insufficient to s 2021But when we are not left with a definite and firm conviction that the trial court made proposition taken in the opinion to reverse: that we can ignore the deferential standard of review appellate courts have long given to trial court findings on the issue of discriminatory intent in the context of a Batson challenge. 56 See Miller-El, 545 US at 244 (explaining that considerations applicable to this fact- finding process include statements by the prosecutor that “mischaracterized [the] testimony” regarding the excused prospective juror’s views). 28 a mistake, a mixed record is insufficient to s | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In re Filibeck Estate
green
2 sentences2017"This Court reviews equitable decisions of the probate court de novo, but overturns any underlying factual findings only upon a finding of clear error." In re Filibeck Estate , 305 Mich. App. 550 , 553, 853 N.W.2d 448 (2014). 2017"This Court reviews equitable decisions of the probate court de novo, but overturns any underlying factual findings only upon a finding of clear error." In re Filibeck Estate , 305 Mich. App. 550 , 553, 853 N.W.2d 448 (2014). | 3 | 2016–2017 |
Loutts v. Loutts
green
2 sentences2017"A finding is clearly erroneous if, after reviewing the entire record, we are left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake was made." Loutts v. Loutts , 298 Mich. App. 21 , 26, 826 N.W.2d 152 (2012) *323 (quotation marks and citations omitted). 2017“A finding is clearly erroneous if, after reviewing the entire record, we are left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake was made.” Loutts v Loutts, 298 Mich App 21, 26 ; 826 NW2d 152 (2012) (quotation marks and citations omitted). | 2 | 2017–2017 |
In Re Williams
green
1 sentence2020Williams, 286 Mich App at 271 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Bureau of Worker's & Unemployment Compensation v. Detroit Medical Center
green
1 sentence2015Id. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
In Re Temple Marital Trust
green
2 sentences2014In re Temple Marital Trust, 278 Mich App 122, 141-142 ; 748 NW2d 265 (2008). 2014In re Temple Marital Trust, 278 Mich App 122, 141-142 ; 748 NW2d 265 (2008). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.