two-fold inquiry (Michigan) · Go Syfert
← Michigan issues

two-fold inquiry in Michigan

8 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1974–2021 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Green v. Wilsongreen
mich · 1997 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
2 sentences

2002Green v Wilson, 455 Mich 342, 347 (opinion by Kelly, J.), 357 (opinion by Weaver, J.); 565 NW2d 813 (1997).

2002Green v Wilson, 455 Mich 342, 347 (opinion by Kelly, J.), 357 (opinion by Weaver, J.); 565 NW2d 813 (1997).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
W H Froh, Inc v. Domanski green
michctapp · 2002
2 sentences

2021“A personal jurisdiction analysis is a two-fold inquiry: (1) do the defendant’s acts fall within the applicable long-arm statute, and (2) does the exercise of jurisdiction over the defendant comport with the requirements of due process.” Id. (citation omitted).

2006W H Froh, Inc v Domanski, 252 Mich App 220, 226 ; 651 NW2d 470 (2002).

22006–2021
Starbrite Distributing, Inc. v. Excelda Manufacturing Co. green
mich · 1997
2 sentences

1997Starbrite Distributing, Inc v Excelda Mfg Co, 454 Mich 302 ; 562 NW2d 640 (1997).

1997Starbrite Distributing, Inc v Excelda Mfg Co, 454 Mich 302 ; 562 NW2d 640 (1997).

11997–1997
People v. Garcia green
mich · 1976
2 sentences

1984People v Garcia, 398 Mich 250 ; 247 NW2d 547 (1976), reh den 399 Mich 1041 (1977).

1984People v Garcia, 398 Mich 250 ; 247 NW2d 547 (1976), reh den 399 Mich 1041 (1977).

11984–1984
People v. Bryant green
michctapp · 1978
2 sentences

1981This Court has set forth a two-fold test for determining whether an offense is a cognate lesser included offense, as follows: "Cognate lesser included offenses share overlapping elements with the greater offense and such overlapping elements relate to a common statutory purpose.” See, also, People v Robinson, 101 Mich App 687, 692 ; 301 NW2d 41 (1980), People v Bryant, 80 Mich App 428, 433 ; 264 NW2d 13 (1978), lv den 402 Mich 942 (1978).

1981This Court has set forth a two-fold test for determining whether an offense is a cognate lesser included offense, as follows: "Cognate lesser included offenses share overlapping elements with the greater offense and such overlapping elements relate to a common statutory purpose.” See, also, People v Robinson, 101 Mich App 687, 692 ; 301 NW2d 41 (1980), People v Bryant, 80 Mich App 428, 433 ; 264 NW2d 13 (1978), lv den 402 Mich 942 (1978).

11981–1981
People v. Robinson green
michctapp · 1980
1 sentence

1981This Court has set forth a two-fold test for determining whether an offense is a cognate lesser included offense, as follows: "Cognate lesser included offenses share overlapping elements with the greater offense and such overlapping elements relate to a common statutory purpose.” See, also, People v Robinson, 101 Mich App 687, 692 ; 301 NW2d 41 (1980), People v Bryant, 80 Mich App 428, 433 ; 264 NW2d 13 (1978), lv den 402 Mich 942 (1978).

11981–1981
Jamens v. Avon Township green
michctapp · 1976
2 sentences

1979In Jamens v Avon Twp, 71 Mich App 70, 78 ; 246 NW2d 410 (1976), 1 the Court distilled the following two-fold rule from the above trilogy of cases: "First, once the Department of Natural Resources pursuant to the garbage and refuse disposal act, MCL 325.291 et seq.; MSA 14.435(1) et seq., has authorized a *563 particular location as a landfill and has prescribed operating procedures, townships may supplement the DNR requirements with '* * * any additional reasonable regulations designed to eliminate any foreseeable health hazard.

1979In Jamens v Avon Twp, 71 Mich App 70, 78 ; 246 NW2d 410 (1976), 1 the Court distilled the following two-fold rule from the above trilogy of cases: "First, once the Department of Natural Resources pursuant to the garbage and refuse disposal act, MCL 325.291 et seq.; MSA 14.435(1) et seq., has authorized a *563 particular location as a landfill and has prescribed operating procedures, townships may supplement the DNR requirements with '* * * any additional reasonable regulations designed to eliminate any foreseeable health hazard.

11979–1979
Brown v. Revere Copper and Brass Corp. green
michctapp · 1972
2 sentences

1974It is argued that both knowledge of the nature of the diseased condition and of the relationship of the disability with employment are required, citing Brown v Revere Copper & Brass Corp, 42 Mich App 143 ; 201 NW2d 326 (1972).

1974It is argued that both knowledge of the nature of the diseased condition and of the relationship of the disability with employment are required, citing Brown v Revere Copper & Brass Corp, 42 Mich App 143 ; 201 NW2d 326 (1972).

11974–1974

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.705 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

LA 95 (1977–2025) CT 34 (1984–2003) NM 33 (1971–2019) MA 30 (1974–2025) TX 29 (1983–2016) OH 24 (1960–2025) NY 18 (1902–2022) NC 13 (2002–2026) PA 13 (1970–2026) SD 12 (1986–2005) WI 10 (1883–2011) CA 8 (1972–2014) MI 8 (1974–2021) HI 7 (1980–2016) FL 7 (1965–2022) MS 7 (1987–2021) ME 6 (1975–2012) WA 5 (2001–2009) MO 5 (2003–2021) IL 5 (1977–2026) AK 5 (1977–1994) NJ 5 (1981–2019) DE 5 (1973–2008) MD 5 (1967–2005) KY 4 (2005–2022) CO 4 (1984–1997) GA 4 (1990–2020) IN 3 (1995–2017) OR 3 (1981–2019) NV 3 (1969–1998) OK 3 (1984–1991) ND 3 (1989–1993) AL 2 (1994–2004) DC 2 (2002–2005) UT 2 (1993–2013) AZ 2 (1983–2016) ID 2 (1987–2018) MT 2 (1971–1986) IA 2 (1981–2008)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check