8 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Schmedeke v. Stategreen2 sentences2007Schmedeke v. State, 136 S.W.3d 532, 533 (Mo.App. 2006Schmedeke v. State, 136 S.W.3d 532, 533 (Mo.App. | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Lawsongreen1 sentence2015U.S. v. Lawson, 677 F.3d 629, 634 (4th Cir. 2012) (applying the presumption of prejudice to juror misconduct by consulting a dictionary or encyclopedia). | 1 | 1 |
BAUMRUK v. Stategreen1 sentence2013Baumruk v. State, 364 S.W.3d 518, 525 (Mo. banc 2012). | 1 | 1 |
Edgington v. Stategreen1 sentence2013See Edgington v. State, 189 S.W.3d 703, 707 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
Sanders v. Stategreen1 sentence1992See Luleff v. State, 807 S.W.2d 495 (Mo. banc 1991) and Sanders v. State, 807 S.W.2d 493 (Mo. banc 1991). | 1 | 1 |
Luleff v. Stategreen1 sentence1992See Luleff v. State, 807 S.W.2d 495 (Mo. banc 1991) and Sanders v. State, 807 S.W.2d 493 (Mo. banc 1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Evans
green
1 sentence2023Id. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Williams v. State
green
1 sentence2007In 1998, the motion court issued its Conclusions of Law, Order and Judgment denying Movant’s PCR motion, including all of the amendments and the request for an evidentiary hearing, and this Court affirmed the denial in Tyler v. State, 18 S.W.3d 117 (Mo.App. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.