60 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1895–1966 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cooledge v. Caseygreen2 sentences1957In Cooledge v. Casey, 58 Ga. App. 134, 137 ( 198 S. E. 96 ), this court held: “An assignment of error on a judgment striking an answer can not be made in a bill of exceptions assigning error on a judgment overruling a general demurrer to a petition. 1957In Cooledge v. Casey, 58 Ga. App. 134, 137 ( 198 S. E. 96 ), this court held: “An assignment of error on a judgment striking an answer can not be made in a bill of exceptions assigning error on a judgment overruling a general demurrer to a petition. | 3 | 4 |
Hooks v. Princegreen2 sentences1956Mechanics’ Bank v. Harrison, 68 Ga. 463 ; Turner v. Camp, 110 Ga. 631 ( 36 S. E. 76 ); Harvey v. Bowles, 112 Ga. 421 (1) ( 37 S. E. 364 ); Fugazzi, Lovelace & Co. v. Tomlinson, 119 Ga. 622 (1) ( 46 S. E. 831 ); Cox v. Hardee, 135 Ga. 80 (5) ( 68 S. E. 932 ); Hooks v. Prince, 171 Ga. 688 ( 156 S. E. 683 ). 1956Mechanics’ Bank v. Harrison, 68 Ga. 463 ; Turner v. Camp, 110 Ga. 631 ( 36 S. E. 76 ); Harvey v. Bowles, 112 Ga. 421 (1) ( 37 S. E. 364 ); Fugazzi, Lovelace & Co. v. Tomlinson, 119 Ga. 622 (1) ( 46 S. E. 831 ); Cox v. Hardee, 135 Ga. 80 (5) ( 68 S. E. 932 ); Hooks v. Prince, 171 Ga. 688 ( 156 S. E. 683 ). | 1 | 2 |
Perry v. Stategreen2 sentences1932Malone v. Hopkins, 49 Ga. 221 ; Cox v. Hillyer, 65 Ga. 57 ; Hanye v. Candler, 99 Ga. 214 ( 25 S. E. 606 ); White v. Butt, 102 Ga. 552 ( 27 S. E. 680 ); Perry v. State, 102 Ga. 365, 368 ( 30 S. E. 903 ); Coggeshall v. Park, 162 Ga. 78 (7 d) ( 132 S. E. 632 ). 1932Malone v. Hopkins, 49 Ga. 221 ; Cox v. Hillyer, 65 Ga. 57 ; Hanye v. Candler, 99 Ga. 214 ( 25 S. E. 606 ); White v. Butt, 102 Ga. 552 ( 27 S. E. 680 ); Perry v. State, 102 Ga. 365, 368 ( 30 S. E. 903 ); Coggeshall v. Park, 162 Ga. 78 (7 d) ( 132 S. E. 632 ). | 1 | 2 |
Tovell v. Legumgreen2 sentences1966Merchants National Bank of Rome v. Armstrong, 107 Ga. 479 (1) ( 33 SE 473 ).” Tovell v. Legum, 207 Ga. 193, 200 (4) ( 60 SE2d 339 ). 1966Merchants National Bank of Rome v. Armstrong, 107 Ga. 479 (1) ( 33 SE 473 ).” Tovell v. Legum, 207 Ga. 193, 200 (4) ( 60 SE2d 339 ). | 1 | 1 |
| Elliott v. Orange Crush Bottling Co.green | 1 | 1 |
| Rawlins v. Mitchellgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Holton v. Lankfordgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wright v. Morris
green
2 sentences1957Wright v. Morris, 50 Ga. App. 196 (3) ( 77 S. E. 365 )It follows that the assignment of error on the striking of the plea of res adjudicata cannot in this case be made in the bill of exceptions assigning error on the judgment overruling the general demurrer to the petition. 1957Wright v. Morris, 50 Ga. App. 196 (3) ( 77 S. E. 365 )It follows that the assignment of error on the striking of the plea of res adjudicata cannot in this case be made in the bill of exceptions assigning error on the judgment overruling the general demurrer to the petition. | 5 | 1938–1957 |
Pickens v. Pickens
green
2 sentences1957Wright v. Morris, 50 Ga. App. 196 (3) ( 77 S. E. 365 )It follows that the assignment of error on the striking of the plea of res adjudicata cannot in this case be made in the bill of exceptions assigning error on the judgment overruling the general demurrer to the petition. 1957Wright v. Morris, 50 Ga. App. 196 (3) ( 77 S. E. 365 )It follows that the assignment of error on the striking of the plea of res adjudicata cannot in this case be made in the bill of exceptions assigning error on the judgment overruling the general demurrer to the petition. | 5 | 1938–1957 |
Biggs v. Silvey
neutral
2 sentences1952Durrence v. Waters, 140 Ga. 762 ( 79 S. E. 841 ); Newton v. Roberts, 163 Ga. 135 ( 135 S. E. 505 ); Gilbert v. Tippens, 183 Ga. 497 ( 188 S. E. 699 ); Carpenter v. State, 194 Ga. 395 ( 21 S. E. 2d, 643 ); Smith v. Barksdale, 199 Ga. 723 ( 35 S. E. 2d, 149 ); Crews v. Crews, 207 Ga. 273 ( 61 S. E. 2d, 144 ). 1951Crews v. Crews, 207 Ga. 273 ( 61 S. E. 2d, 144 ); Durrence v. Waters, 140 Ga. 762 ( 79 S. E. 841 ); Newton v. Roberts, 163 Ga. 135 ( 135 S. E. 505 ); Gilbert v. Tippens, 183 Ga. 497 ( 188 S. E. 699 ); Smith v. Barksdale, 199 Ga. 723 ( 35 S. E. 2d, 149 ); Kumpe v. Hudgins, 39 Ga. App. 788 ( 149 S. E. 56 ); Bearden v. Longino, 181 Ga. 807 ( 184 S. E. 319 ); Rabhan v. Rabhan, 185 Ga. 355 ( 195 S. E. 193 ); Womack v. Williford, 194 Ga. 688 ( 22 S. E. 2d 519 ); Kronstadt v. Ray, 201 Ga. 312 ( 39 S. E. 2d, 664 ); Story v. City of Macon, 203 Ga. 105 ( 45 S. E. 2d, 196 ); Simpson v. Simpson, 204 Ga. 3 | 5 | 1935–1952 |
Harris v. Jones
neutral
2 sentences1952Durrence v. Waters, 140 Ga. 762 ( 79 S. E. 841 ); Newton v. Roberts, 163 Ga. 135 ( 135 S. E. 505 ); Gilbert v. Tippens, 183 Ga. 497 ( 188 S. E. 699 ); Carpenter v. State, 194 Ga. 395 ( 21 S. E. 2d, 643 ); Smith v. Barksdale, 199 Ga. 723 ( 35 S. E. 2d, 149 ); Crews v. Crews, 207 Ga. 273 ( 61 S. E. 2d, 144 ). 1951Crews v. Crews, 207 Ga. 273 ( 61 S. E. 2d, 144 ); Durrence v. Waters, 140 Ga. 762 ( 79 S. E. 841 ); Newton v. Roberts, 163 Ga. 135 ( 135 S. E. 505 ); Gilbert v. Tippens, 183 Ga. 497 ( 188 S. E. 699 ); Smith v. Barksdale, 199 Ga. 723 ( 35 S. E. 2d, 149 ); Kumpe v. Hudgins, 39 Ga. App. 788 ( 149 S. E. 56 ); Bearden v. Longino, 181 Ga. 807 ( 184 S. E. 319 ); Rabhan v. Rabhan, 185 Ga. 355 ( 195 S. E. 193 ); Womack v. Williford, 194 Ga. 688 ( 22 S. E. 2d 519 ); Kronstadt v. Ray, 201 Ga. 312 ( 39 S. E. 2d, 664 ); Story v. City of Macon, 203 Ga. 105 ( 45 S. E. 2d, 196 ); Simpson v. Simpson, 204 Ga. 3 | 5 | 1935–1952 |
Newton v. Roberts
green
2 sentences1952Durrence v. Waters, 140 Ga. 762 ( 79 S. E. 841 ); Newton v. Roberts, 163 Ga. 135 ( 135 S. E. 505 ); Gilbert v. Tippens, 183 Ga. 497 ( 188 S. E. 699 ); Carpenter v. State, 194 Ga. 395 ( 21 S. E. 2d, 643 ); Smith v. Barksdale, 199 Ga. 723 ( 35 S. E. 2d, 149 ); Crews v. Crews, 207 Ga. 273 ( 61 S. E. 2d, 144 ). 1952Durrence v. Waters, 140 Ga. 762 ( 79 S. E. 841 ); Newton v. Roberts, 163 Ga. 135 ( 135 S. E. 505 ); Gilbert v. Tippens, 183 Ga. 497 ( 188 S. E. 699 ); Carpenter v. State, 194 Ga. 395 ( 21 S. E. 2d, 643 ); Smith v. Barksdale, 199 Ga. 723 ( 35 S. E. 2d, 149 ); Crews v. Crews, 207 Ga. 273 ( 61 S. E. 2d, 144 ). | 5 | 1935–1952 |
Gilbert v. Tippens, superintendent of banks
green
2 sentences1952Durrence v. Waters, 140 Ga. 762 ( 79 S. E. 841 ); Newton v. Roberts, 163 Ga. 135 ( 135 S. E. 505 ); Gilbert v. Tippens, 183 Ga. 497 ( 188 S. E. 699 ); Carpenter v. State, 194 Ga. 395 ( 21 S. E. 2d, 643 ); Smith v. Barksdale, 199 Ga. 723 ( 35 S. E. 2d, 149 ); Crews v. Crews, 207 Ga. 273 ( 61 S. E. 2d, 144 ). 1952Durrence v. Waters, 140 Ga. 762 ( 79 S. E. 841 ); Newton v. Roberts, 163 Ga. 135 ( 135 S. E. 505 ); Gilbert v. Tippens, 183 Ga. 497 ( 188 S. E. 699 ); Carpenter v. State, 194 Ga. 395 ( 21 S. E. 2d, 643 ); Smith v. Barksdale, 199 Ga. 723 ( 35 S. E. 2d, 149 ); Crews v. Crews, 207 Ga. 273 ( 61 S. E. 2d, 144 ). | 4 | 1945–1952 |
White v. Butt
green
2 sentences1949Malone v. Hopkins, 49 Ga. 221 ; Cox v. Hillyer, 65 Ga. 57 ; Hanye v. Candler, 99 Ga. 214 ; White v. Butt, 102 Ga. 552 ; Perry v. Candler, 102 Ga. 368 .” See also Rawlins v. Mitchell, 127 Ga. 24, 28 ( 55 S. E. 958 ); Landers v. Cobb, 150 Ga. 80 ( 102 S. E. 428 ). 1916Of course, where the judge declines to entertain an extraordinary motion for a new trial which is entirely without merit, the Supreme Court or this court will not by mandamus compel him to certify a bill of exceptions assigning error upon such refusal (Harris v. Roan, 119 Ga. 379 ; White v. Butt, 102 Ga. 552 ; Seaboard Air-Line Ry. v. Reid, 6 Ga. App. 18 ); but where he does in fact entertain the motion and hears and determines the same and renders final judgment against the movant, in my opinion a mandamus nisi should be granted by the reviewing court to compel the judge to certify a bill of | 4 | 1916–1949 |
Conwell v. McWhorter
green
2 sentences1944In Thompson v. McGhee, 93 Ga. 254 ( 19 S. E. 32 ), it was held that under this statute and the law as now embraced in the Code, § 6-903, a bill of exceptions assigning error on a judgment refusing mandamus absolute must be tendered within 20 days from the date of such judgment, whether rendered in term or during vacation. 1938It was held in Thompson v. McGhee, 93 Ga. 254 ( 19 S. E. 32 ): “Under the act of September 26th, 1883 (Acts of 1882-3, pp. 103-4), which makes applicable to bills of exceptions sued out in cases, of mandamus the law regulating the practice in injunction cases, a bill of exceptions assigning error upon the refusal of the court to grant a mandamus ■ absolute must be tendered and certified within twenty days from the date of the decision complained of, whether rendered in term or during vacation. | 4 | 1902–1944 |
Harris v. Roan
green
2 sentences1929“This court will not by mandamus compel a judge to certify a bill of exceptions assigning error upon the refusal of the judge to entertain an extraordinary motion for a new trial, and grant a rule nisi thereon, when it appears that such motion is without merit.” Harris v. Roan, 119 Ga. 379 (6) ( 46 S. E. 433 ). 1917In Harris v. Roan, 119 Ga. 379 ( 46 S. E. 433 ), it was said that, “when an alleged extraordinary motion for a new trial is entirely ' without merit, it is proper for the judge to decline to entertain the same and to refuse to grant a rule nisi thereon,” and it was further held that the Supreme Court will not by mandamus compel a judge to certify to a bill of exceptions assigning error upon his refusal to entertain an extraordinary motion for a new trial and grant a rule nisi thereon when it appears that the motion is without merit. | 4 | 1916–1934 |
Powell v. Powell
green
2 sentences1952Durrence v. Waters, 140 Ga. 762 ( 79 S. E. 841 ); Newton v. Roberts, 163 Ga. 135 ( 135 S. E. 505 ); Gilbert v. Tippens, 183 Ga. 497 ( 188 S. E. 699 ); Carpenter v. State, 194 Ga. 395 ( 21 S. E. 2d, 643 ); Smith v. Barksdale, 199 Ga. 723 ( 35 S. E. 2d, 149 ); Crews v. Crews, 207 Ga. 273 ( 61 S. E. 2d, 144 ). 1951Crews v. Crews, 207 Ga. 273 ( 61 S. E. 2d, 144 ); Durrence v. Waters, 140 Ga. 762 ( 79 S. E. 841 ); Newton v. Roberts, 163 Ga. 135 ( 135 S. E. 505 ); Gilbert v. Tippens, 183 Ga. 497 ( 188 S. E. 699 ); Smith v. Barksdale, 199 Ga. 723 ( 35 S. E. 2d, 149 ); Kumpe v. Hudgins, 39 Ga. App. 788 ( 149 S. E. 56 ); Bearden v. Longino, 181 Ga. 807 ( 184 S. E. 319 ); Rabhan v. Rabhan, 185 Ga. 355 ( 195 S. E. 193 ); Womack v. Williford, 194 Ga. 688 ( 22 S. E. 2d 519 ); Kronstadt v. Ray, 201 Ga. 312 ( 39 S. E. 2d, 664 ); Story v. City of Macon, 203 Ga. 105 ( 45 S. E. 2d, 196 ); Simpson v. Simpson, 204 Ga. 3 | 3 | 1950–1952 |
Smith v. Barksdale
neutral
2 sentences1952Durrence v. Waters, 140 Ga. 762 ( 79 S. E. 841 ); Newton v. Roberts, 163 Ga. 135 ( 135 S. E. 505 ); Gilbert v. Tippens, 183 Ga. 497 ( 188 S. E. 699 ); Carpenter v. State, 194 Ga. 395 ( 21 S. E. 2d, 643 ); Smith v. Barksdale, 199 Ga. 723 ( 35 S. E. 2d, 149 ); Crews v. Crews, 207 Ga. 273 ( 61 S. E. 2d, 144 ). 1951Crews v. Crews, 207 Ga. 273 ( 61 S. E. 2d, 144 ); Durrence v. Waters, 140 Ga. 762 ( 79 S. E. 841 ); Newton v. Roberts, 163 Ga. 135 ( 135 S. E. 505 ); Gilbert v. Tippens, 183 Ga. 497 ( 188 S. E. 699 ); Smith v. Barksdale, 199 Ga. 723 ( 35 S. E. 2d, 149 ); Kumpe v. Hudgins, 39 Ga. App. 788 ( 149 S. E. 56 ); Bearden v. Longino, 181 Ga. 807 ( 184 S. E. 319 ); Rabhan v. Rabhan, 185 Ga. 355 ( 195 S. E. 193 ); Womack v. Williford, 194 Ga. 688 ( 22 S. E. 2d 519 ); Kronstadt v. Ray, 201 Ga. 312 ( 39 S. E. 2d, 664 ); Story v. City of Macon, 203 Ga. 105 ( 45 S. E. 2d, 196 ); Simpson v. Simpson, 204 Ga. 3 | 3 | 1950–1952 |
Carpenter v. State Ex Rel. Hains
green
2 sentences1952Durrence v. Waters, 140 Ga. 762 ( 79 S. E. 841 ); Newton v. Roberts, 163 Ga. 135 ( 135 S. E. 505 ); Gilbert v. Tippens, 183 Ga. 497 ( 188 S. E. 699 ); Carpenter v. State, 194 Ga. 395 ( 21 S. E. 2d, 643 ); Smith v. Barksdale, 199 Ga. 723 ( 35 S. E. 2d, 149 ); Crews v. Crews, 207 Ga. 273 ( 61 S. E. 2d, 144 ). 1952Durrence v. Waters, 140 Ga. 762 ( 79 S. E. 841 ); Newton v. Roberts, 163 Ga. 135 ( 135 S. E. 505 ); Gilbert v. Tippens, 183 Ga. 497 ( 188 S. E. 699 ); Carpenter v. State, 194 Ga. 395 ( 21 S. E. 2d, 643 ); Smith v. Barksdale, 199 Ga. 723 ( 35 S. E. 2d, 149 ); Crews v. Crews, 207 Ga. 273 ( 61 S. E. 2d, 144 ). | 3 | 1945–1952 |
Cox v. Hillyer
green
2 sentences1949Malone v. Hopkins, 49 Ga. 221 ; Cox v. Hillyer, 65 Ga. 57 ; Hanye v. Candler, 99 Ga. 214 ; White v. Butt, 102 Ga. 552 ; Perry v. Candler, 102 Ga. 368 .” See also Rawlins v. Mitchell, 127 Ga. 24, 28 ( 55 S. E. 958 ); Landers v. Cobb, 150 Ga. 80 ( 102 S. E. 428 ). 1932Malone v. Hopkins, 49 Ga. 221 ; Cox v. Hillyer, 65 Ga. 57 ; Hanye v. Candler, 99 Ga. 214 ( 25 S. E. 606 ); White v. Butt, 102 Ga. 552 ( 27 S. E. 680 ); Perry v. State, 102 Ga. 365, 368 ( 30 S. E. 903 ); Coggeshall v. Park, 162 Ga. 78 (7 d) ( 132 S. E. 632 ). | 3 | 1926–1949 |
Hanye v. Candler
neutral
2 sentences1949Malone v. Hopkins, 49 Ga. 221 ; Cox v. Hillyer, 65 Ga. 57 ; Hanye v. Candler, 99 Ga. 214 ; White v. Butt, 102 Ga. 552 ; Perry v. Candler, 102 Ga. 368 .” See also Rawlins v. Mitchell, 127 Ga. 24, 28 ( 55 S. E. 958 ); Landers v. Cobb, 150 Ga. 80 ( 102 S. E. 428 ). 1932Malone v. Hopkins, 49 Ga. 221 ; Cox v. Hillyer, 65 Ga. 57 ; Hanye v. Candler, 99 Ga. 214 ( 25 S. E. 606 ); White v. Butt, 102 Ga. 552 ( 27 S. E. 680 ); Perry v. State, 102 Ga. 365, 368 ( 30 S. E. 903 ); Coggeshall v. Park, 162 Ga. 78 (7 d) ( 132 S. E. 632 ). | 3 | 1926–1949 |
Thompson v. McGhee
green
2 sentences1944In Thompson v. McGhee, 93 Ga. 254 ( 19 S. E. 32 ), it was held that under this statute and the law as now embraced in the Code, § 6-903, a bill of exceptions assigning error on a judgment refusing mandamus absolute must be tendered within 20 days from the date of such judgment, whether rendered in term or during vacation. 1938It was held in Thompson v. McGhee, 93 Ga. 254 ( 19 S. E. 32 ): “Under the act of September 26th, 1883 (Acts of 1882-3, pp. 103-4), which makes applicable to bills of exceptions sued out in cases, of mandamus the law regulating the practice in injunction cases, a bill of exceptions assigning error upon the refusal of the court to grant a mandamus ■ absolute must be tendered and certified within twenty days from the date of the decision complained of, whether rendered in term or during vacation. | 3 | 1912–1944 |
Holder v. Jelks
green
2 sentences1944In Board of Veterinary Examiners v. Ruffin, 147 Ga. 441 (supra), this court in a unanimous decision ruled as follows: '“Where after final judgment by the court upon an agreed statement of facts, without the intervention of a jury, in a mandamus case, a motion for new trial is made, and at the hearing a judgment is rendered dismissing the motion, Civil Code § 6153 [Code of 1933, § 6-903], as construed in Holder v. Jelks, 116 Ga. 134 ( 42 S. E. 400 ), and Bacon v. Jones, 116 Ga. 136, 139 ( 42 S. E. 401 ), is applicable, and a bill of exceptions assigning error upon such judgment should be presen 1944In Board of Veterinary Examiners v. Ruffin, 147 Ga. 441 (supra), this court in a unanimous decision ruled as follows: '“Where after final judgment by the court upon an agreed statement of facts, without the intervention of a jury, in a mandamus case, a motion for new trial is made, and at the hearing a judgment is rendered dismissing the motion, Civil Code § 6153 [Code of 1933, § 6-903], as construed in Holder v. Jelks, 116 Ga. 134 ( 42 S. E. 400 ), and Bacon v. Jones, 116 Ga. 136, 139 ( 42 S. E. 401 ), is applicable, and a bill of exceptions assigning error upon such judgment should be presen | 3 | 1912–1944 |
Owen v. State
green
2 sentences1929“This court will not by mandamus compel a judge to certify a bill of exceptions assigning error upon the refusal of the judge to entertain an extraordinary motion for a new trial, and grant a rule nisi thereon, when it appears that such motion is without merit.” Harris v. Roan, 119 Ga. 379 (6) ( 46 S. E. 433 ). 1917In Harris v. Roan, 119 Ga. 379 ( 46 S. E. 433 ), it was said that, “when an alleged extraordinary motion for a new trial is entirely ' without merit, it is proper for the judge to decline to entertain the same and to refuse to grant a rule nisi thereon,” and it was further held that the Supreme Court will not by mandamus compel a judge to certify to a bill of exceptions assigning error upon his refusal to entertain an extraordinary motion for a new trial and grant a rule nisi thereon when it appears that the motion is without merit. | 3 | 1917–1934 |
Merchants National Bank v. Armstrong
green
2 sentences1966Merchants National Bank of Rome v. Armstrong, 107 Ga. 479 (1) ( 33 SE 473 ).” Tovell v. Legum, 207 Ga. 193, 200 (4) ( 60 SE2d 339 ). 1966Merchants National Bank of Rome v. Armstrong, 107 Ga. 479 (1) ( 33 SE 473 ).” Tovell v. Legum, 207 Ga. 193, 200 (4) ( 60 SE2d 339 ). | 2 | 1950–1966 |
Turner v. Camp
green
2 sentences1956Mechanics’ Bank v. Harrison, 68 Ga. 463 ; Turner v. Camp, 110 Ga. 631 ( 36 S. E. 76 ); Harvey v. Bowles, 112 Ga. 421 (1) ( 37 S. E. 364 ); Fugazzi, Lovelace & Co. v. Tomlinson, 119 Ga. 622 (1) ( 46 S. E. 831 ); Cox v. Hardee, 135 Ga. 80 (5) ( 68 S. E. 932 ); Hooks v. Prince, 171 Ga. 688 ( 156 S. E. 683 ). 1956Mechanics’ Bank v. Harrison, 68 Ga. 463 ; Turner v. Camp, 110 Ga. 631 ( 36 S. E. 76 ); Harvey v. Bowles, 112 Ga. 421 (1) ( 37 S. E. 364 ); Fugazzi, Lovelace & Co. v. Tomlinson, 119 Ga. 622 (1) ( 46 S. E. 831 ); Cox v. Hardee, 135 Ga. 80 (5) ( 68 S. E. 932 ); Hooks v. Prince, 171 Ga. 688 ( 156 S. E. 683 ). | 2 | 1953–1956 |
Smith v. Walker & Izlar
neutral
2 sentences1956Mechanics’ Bank v. Harrison, 68 Ga. 463 ; Turner v. Camp, 110 Ga. 631 ( 36 S. E. 76 ); Harvey v. Bowles, 112 Ga. 421 (1) ( 37 S. E. 364 ); Fugazzi, Lovelace & Co. v. Tomlinson, 119 Ga. 622 (1) ( 46 S. E. 831 ); Cox v. Hardee, 135 Ga. 80 (5) ( 68 S. E. 932 ); Hooks v. Prince, 171 Ga. 688 ( 156 S. E. 683 ). 1953Wright v. Morris, 50 Ga. App. 196 (3) ( 77 S. E. 365 )." Cooledge v. Casey, 58 Ga. App. 134, 137 (2) ( 198 S. E. 96 ); Fugazzi v. Tomlinson, 119 Ga. 622 ( 46 S. E. 831 ); Vanzant v. First National Bank, 164 Ga. 772 (2 a) ( 139 S. E. 537 ); Turner v. Camp, 110 Ga. 631 (2), 632 ( 36 S. E. 76 ); Cox v. Hardee, 135 Ga. 80 (5) ( 68 S. E. 932 ); Hooks v. Prince, 171 Ga. 688, 690 ( 156 S. E. 683 ); Ray v. Anderson, 117 Ga. 136 ( 43 S. E. 408 ). | 2 | 1953–1956 |
Fugazzi, Lovelace & Co. v. Tomlinson
neutral
2 sentences1956Mechanics’ Bank v. Harrison, 68 Ga. 463 ; Turner v. Camp, 110 Ga. 631 ( 36 S. E. 76 ); Harvey v. Bowles, 112 Ga. 421 (1) ( 37 S. E. 364 ); Fugazzi, Lovelace & Co. v. Tomlinson, 119 Ga. 622 (1) ( 46 S. E. 831 ); Cox v. Hardee, 135 Ga. 80 (5) ( 68 S. E. 932 ); Hooks v. Prince, 171 Ga. 688 ( 156 S. E. 683 ). 1953Wright v. Morris, 50 Ga. App. 196 (3) ( 77 S. E. 365 )." Cooledge v. Casey, 58 Ga. App. 134, 137 (2) ( 198 S. E. 96 ); Fugazzi v. Tomlinson, 119 Ga. 622 ( 46 S. E. 831 ); Vanzant v. First National Bank, 164 Ga. 772 (2 a) ( 139 S. E. 537 ); Turner v. Camp, 110 Ga. 631 (2), 632 ( 36 S. E. 76 ); Cox v. Hardee, 135 Ga. 80 (5) ( 68 S. E. 932 ); Hooks v. Prince, 171 Ga. 688, 690 ( 156 S. E. 683 ); Ray v. Anderson, 117 Ga. 136 ( 43 S. E. 408 ). | 2 | 1953–1956 |
Cox v. Hardee
green
2 sentences1956Mechanics’ Bank v. Harrison, 68 Ga. 463 ; Turner v. Camp, 110 Ga. 631 ( 36 S. E. 76 ); Harvey v. Bowles, 112 Ga. 421 (1) ( 37 S. E. 364 ); Fugazzi, Lovelace & Co. v. Tomlinson, 119 Ga. 622 (1) ( 46 S. E. 831 ); Cox v. Hardee, 135 Ga. 80 (5) ( 68 S. E. 932 ); Hooks v. Prince, 171 Ga. 688 ( 156 S. E. 683 ). 1956Mechanics’ Bank v. Harrison, 68 Ga. 463 ; Turner v. Camp, 110 Ga. 631 ( 36 S. E. 76 ); Harvey v. Bowles, 112 Ga. 421 (1) ( 37 S. E. 364 ); Fugazzi, Lovelace & Co. v. Tomlinson, 119 Ga. 622 (1) ( 46 S. E. 831 ); Cox v. Hardee, 135 Ga. 80 (5) ( 68 S. E. 932 ); Hooks v. Prince, 171 Ga. 688 ( 156 S. E. 683 ). | 2 | 1953–1956 |
Crews v. Crews
neutral
2 sentences1952Durrence v. Waters, 140 Ga. 762 ( 79 S. E. 841 ); Newton v. Roberts, 163 Ga. 135 ( 135 S. E. 505 ); Gilbert v. Tippens, 183 Ga. 497 ( 188 S. E. 699 ); Carpenter v. State, 194 Ga. 395 ( 21 S. E. 2d, 643 ); Smith v. Barksdale, 199 Ga. 723 ( 35 S. E. 2d, 149 ); Crews v. Crews, 207 Ga. 273 ( 61 S. E. 2d, 144 ). 1952Durrence v. Waters, 140 Ga. 762 ( 79 S. E. 841 ); Newton v. Roberts, 163 Ga. 135 ( 135 S. E. 505 ); Gilbert v. Tippens, 183 Ga. 497 ( 188 S. E. 699 ); Carpenter v. State, 194 Ga. 395 ( 21 S. E. 2d, 643 ); Smith v. Barksdale, 199 Ga. 723 ( 35 S. E. 2d, 149 ); Crews v. Crews, 207 Ga. 273 ( 61 S. E. 2d, 144 ). | 2 | 1951–1952 |
State v. Malone
green
2 sentences1949Malone v. Hopkins, 49 Ga. 221 ; Cox v. Hillyer, 65 Ga. 57 ; Hanye v. Candler, 99 Ga. 214 ; White v. Butt, 102 Ga. 552 ; Perry v. Candler, 102 Ga. 368 .” See also Rawlins v. Mitchell, 127 Ga. 24, 28 ( 55 S. E. 958 ); Landers v. Cobb, 150 Ga. 80 ( 102 S. E. 428 ). 1932Malone v. Hopkins, 49 Ga. 221 ; Cox v. Hillyer, 65 Ga. 57 ; Hanye v. Candler, 99 Ga. 214 ( 25 S. E. 606 ); White v. Butt, 102 Ga. 552 ( 27 S. E. 680 ); Perry v. State, 102 Ga. 365, 368 ( 30 S. E. 903 ); Coggeshall v. Park, 162 Ga. 78 (7 d) ( 132 S. E. 632 ). | 2 | 1932–1949 |
Southern Railway Co. v. Dantzler
neutral
2 sentences1932Malone v. Hopkins, 49 Ga. 221 ; Cox v. Hillyer, 65 Ga. 57 ; Hanye v. Candler, 99 Ga. 214 ( 25 S. E. 606 ); White v. Butt, 102 Ga. 552 ( 27 S. E. 680 ); Perry v. State, 102 Ga. 365, 368 ( 30 S. E. 903 ); Coggeshall v. Park, 162 Ga. 78 (7 d) ( 132 S. E. 632 ). 1926Malone v. Hopkins, Cox v. Hillyer, supra; Hanye v. Candler, 99 Ga. 214 ( 25 S. E. 606 ); Perry v. State, 102 Ga. 368 ( 30 S. E. 903 ) ; White v. Butt, 102 Ga. 552 ( 27 S. E. 680 ) ; Harris v. Roan, supra; S. A. L. | 2 | 1926–1932 |
Fisher v. Savannah Guano Co.
neutral
2 sentences1965Sess., pp. 440, 455), and the Act of 1957 (Ga. L. 1957, pp. 224, 230); Code § 6-1608, as amended by the Act of 1959 (Ga. L. 1959, pp. 353, 354)), and the fact that other assignments of error therein would not support a bill of exceptions does not authorize a dismissal of such bill of exceptions.' 2. (a) Where pleas to an action brought on a promissory note are stricken on demurrer and a final judgment by default is entered against the defendants and there is no exception thereto, this error, if any, is no cause for setting this judgment aside or for granting a new trial (see Fisher v. Savannah 1965Sess., pp. 440, 455), and the Act of 1957 (Ga. L. 1957, pp. 224, 230); Code § 6-1608, as amended by the Act of 1959 (Ga. L. 1959, pp. 353, 354)), and the fact that other assignments of error therein would not support a bill of exceptions does not authorize a dismissal of such bill of exceptions.' 2. (a) Where pleas to an action brought on a promissory note are stricken on demurrer and a final judgment by default is entered against the defendants and there is no exception thereto, this error, if any, is no cause for setting this judgment aside or for granting a new trial (see Fisher v. Savannah | 1 | 1965–1965 |
| Dougherty County v. Pylant green | 1 | 1963–1963 |
| Bridges v. Elrod green | 1 | 1963–1963 |
| Adams v. Perry green | 1 | 1963–1963 |
| Mayor of Savannah v. Richter green | 1 | 1957–1957 |
| White v. Chisolm green | 1 | 1957–1957 |
| Echols v. State green | 1 | 1957–1957 |
| Mechanics' & Traders' Bank v. Harrison neutral | 1 | 1956–1956 |
| Little v. Sparks green | 1 | 1956–1956 |
| Preston v. Walker green | 1 | 1956–1956 |
| Wilson v. Hinnant green | 1 | 1953–1953 |
| Ray v. Anderson green | 1 | 1953–1953 |
| Hill v. State green | 1 | 1953–1953 |
| Lamb v. State green | 1 | 1953–1953 |
| Oliveros v. State green | 1 | 1953–1953 |