8 New Mexico opinions name it 2 courts 1971–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Mexico courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sanchez v. City of Santa Fegreen2 sentences1998Sanchez v. City of Santa Fe, 82 N.M. 322, 324 , 481 P.2d 401, 403 (1971). 1998Sanchez v. City of Santa Fe, 82 N.M. 322, 324 , 481 P.2d 401, 403 (1971). | 4 | 4 |
Chronis v. State Ex Rel. Rodriguezgreen2 sentences1991Rodriguez, 100 N.M. 342, 347 , 670 P.2d 953, 958 (1983) (quoting Sanchez v. City of Santa Fe, 82 N.M. 322, 324 , 481 P.2d 401, 403 (1971) (citations omitted in original)). 1991Rodriguez, 100 N.M. 342, 347 , 670 P.2d 953, 958 (1983) (quoting Sanchez v. City of Santa Fe, 82 N.M. 322, 324 , 481 P.2d 401, 403 (1971) (citations omitted in original)). | 1 | 1 |
Marshall v. Hillgreen2 sentences1971Marshall v. Hill, 47 Del. 478 , 93 A.2d 524, 525 (1952); Vol. 2 Words and Phrases, p. 342. 1971Marshall v. Hill, 47 Del. 478 , 93 A.2d 524, 525 (1952); Vol. 2 Words and Phrases, p. 342. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Mexico. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Las Cruces v. El Paso Electric Co.
green
2 sentences2013Our Supreme Court has stated “[t]he prerequisites of actual controversy ... in a declaratory judgment action are: a controversy involving rights or other legal relations of the parties seeking declaratory relief; a claim of right or other legal interest asserted against one who has an interest in contesting the claim; interests of the parties must be real and adverse; and the issue . . . must be ripe for judicial determination.” Id. (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). {26} The Unions argue that an actual controversy continues to exist despite the new agreements because the new agr 2013An actual 5 1 controversy exists where (1) there is “a controversy involving rights or other legal 2 relations of the parties seeking declaratory relief”; (2) there is “a claim of right or 3 other legal interest asserted against one who has an interest in contesting the claim;” 4 (3) the “interests of the parties [are] real and adverse;” and lastly, (4) “the issue 5 involved [is] ripe for judicial determination.” Id. 6 {8} In this case, the Unions’ contentions became moot when the Unions entered 7 into new CBAs with Respondent. | 3 | 2012–2013 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.