Vaughn motion in Ohio

8 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

Case	Followed	Cited
State ex rel. Evans v. Mooregreen ohio · 1982 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012Evans v. Moore, 69 Ohio St.2d 88, 91 (1982). 2012Evans v. Moore, 69 Ohio St.2d 88, 91 (1982).	1	1
Harris v. Van Hoosegreen ohio · 1990 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012Although the item not listed on the payroll reports in Vaughn 1 was fringe benefit payments, we find the Vaughn analysis persuasive and applicable to the omitted items here. {¶34} Moreover, we are mindful of the primary purpose of Ohio’s prevailing wage law, which was enacted to “support the integrity of the collective bargaining process by preventing the undercutting of employee wages in the private sector.” Harris v. Van Hoose 49 Ohio St.3d 24, 26 (1990) quoting State ex rel. 2012Although the item not listed on the payroll reports in Vaughn 1 was fringe benefit payments, we find the Vaughn analysis persuasive and applicable to the omitted items here. {¶34} Moreover, we are mindful of the primary purpose of Ohio’s prevailing wage law, which was enacted to “support the integrity of the collective bargaining process by preventing the undercutting of employee wages in the private sector.” Harris v. Van Hoose 49 Ohio St.3d 24, 26 (1990) quoting State ex rel.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

Case	Cited	Years
Valentine v. Conrad green ohio · 2006 2 sentences 2020Valentine v. Conrad, 110 Ohio St.3d 42 , 2006-Ohio-3561 , 850 N.E.2d 683, ¶ 9 . 2020Valentine v. Conrad, 110 Ohio St.3d 42 , 2006-Ohio-3561 , 850 N.E.2d 683, ¶ 9 .	1	2020–2020
Cullen & Vaughn Co. v. Bender Co. green ohio · 1930 1 sentence 2013Id. at 86 .	1	2013–2013
State v. Xie green ohio · 1992 2 sentences 2008A motion made pursuant to Crim.R. 32.1 is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and the good faith, credibility and weight of the movant's assertions in support of the motion are matters to be resolved by that court. {¶ 9} In State v. Xie (1992), 62 Ohio St.3d 521 , 584 N.E.2d 715 , the Ohio Supreme Court held that unless denial of the motion to withdraw is clearly warranted, a trial court should conduct a hearing. 2008A motion made pursuant to Crim.R. 32.1 is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and the good faith, credibility and weight of the movant's assertions in support of the motion are matters to be resolved by that court. {¶ 9} In State v. Xie (1992), 62 Ohio St.3d 521 , 584 N.E.2d 715 , the Ohio Supreme Court held that unless denial of the motion to withdraw is clearly warranted, a trial court should conduct a hearing.	1	2008–2008
Pons v. Ohio State Medical Board green ohio · 1993 1 sentence 2008Bd , 66 Ohio St.3d 619 , 621 , 1993-Ohio-0122 . {¶ 50} We cannot say the common pleas court, in denying Vaughn's motion for attorney fees was unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionable.	1	2008–2008
Pons v. Ohio State Med. Bd. neutral ohio · 1993 1 sentence 2008Bd , 66 Ohio St.3d 619 , 621 , 1993-Ohio-0122 . {¶ 50} We cannot say the common pleas court, in denying Vaughn's motion for attorney fees was unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionable.	1	2008–2008
Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co. green ohio · 1978 2 sentences 2006Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co. (1978), 54 Ohio St.2d 64, 66 , 8 O.O.3d 73 , 375 N.E.2d 46 ; Civ.R. 56(C). {¶ 12} Shambaugh’s first assignment of error addresses Vaughn’s claim that Shambaugh violated the prevailing-wage law by failing to maintain a one-to-one journeyman-to-apprentice ratio on the project jobsite. 2006Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co. (1978), 54 Ohio St.2d 64, 66 , 8 O.O.3d 73 , 375 N.E.2d 46 ; Civ.R. 56(C). {¶ 12} Shambaugh’s first assignment of error addresses Vaughn’s claim that Shambaugh violated the prevailing-wage law by failing to maintain a one-to-one journeyman-to-apprentice ratio on the project jobsite.	1	2006–2006
State Ex Rel. Asti v. Ohio Department of Youth Services neutral ohio · 2005 2 sentences 2006Asti v. Ohio Dept. of Youth Servs., 107 Ohio St.3d 262 , 2005-Ohio-6432 , 838 N.E.2d 658 , ¶ 17. {¶ 10} Vaughn’s claim is governed by R.C. 4115.16, which provides: {¶ 11} “(A) An interested party may file a complaint with the director of commerce alleging a violation of sections 4115.03 to 4115.16 of the Revised Code. 2006Asti v. Ohio Dept. of Youth Servs., 107 Ohio St.3d 262 , 2005-Ohio-6432 , 838 N.E.2d 658 , ¶ 17. {¶ 10} Vaughn’s claim is governed by R.C. 4115.16, which provides: {¶ 11} “(A) An interested party may file a complaint with the director of commerce alleging a violation of sections 4115.03 to 4115.16 of the Revised Code.	1	2006–2006
State v. Sullivan green ohio · 2001 2 sentences 2002After diligently searching the record, we conclude that the finding that Vaughn was non-restorable has not been journalized. 2 See R.C. 2945.401 (C) (requiring a review of the defendant's mental status). 3 (2001), 90 Ohio St.3d 502 , 739 N.E.2d 788 . 4 Id . at 504-505, 739 N.E.2d at 791 -792 . 5 Id at 507, 739 N.E.2d at 793 . 6 Id . at 509, 739 N.E.2d at 794 . 7 See R.C. 2945.39 (A)(2) 8 We note that on November 21, 2001, the Ohio General Assembly amended R.C. 2945.38 so that it conformed to the Ohio Supreme Court's ruling in State v. Sullivan . 2002After diligently searching the record, we conclude that the finding that Vaughn was non-restorable has not been journalized. 2 See R.C. 2945.401 (C) (requiring a review of the defendant's mental status). 3 (2001), 90 Ohio St.3d 502 , 739 N.E.2d 788 . 4 Id . at 504-505, 739 N.E.2d at 791 -792 . 5 Id at 507, 739 N.E.2d at 793 . 6 Id . at 509, 739 N.E.2d at 794 . 7 See R.C. 2945.39 (A)(2) 8 We note that on November 21, 2001, the Ohio General Assembly amended R.C. 2945.38 so that it conformed to the Ohio Supreme Court's ruling in State v. Sullivan .	1	2002–2002

Statutes the citing opinions construe

OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 4115.03 (3) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 4115.16 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 8 (1990–2025) OH 8 (2002–2020) LA 3 (2018–2019) CA 3 (1981–2025) MO 3 (1987–2025) AL 3 (2003–2013) GA 2 (1995–2003) FL 2 (2004–2015) KY 2 (2010–2022) IN 2 (2012–2013)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check