8 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wisconsin v. Mitchell
green
2 sentences2021“Traditionally, sentencing judges have considered a wide variety of factors in addition to evidence bearing on guilt in determining what sentence to impose on a convicted defendant.” Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S. 476, 485 , 113 S.Ct. 2194 , 124 L.Ed.2d 436 (1993). 2021“Traditionally, sentencing judges have considered a wide variety of factors in addition to evidence bearing on guilt in determining what sentence to impose on a convicted defendant.” Wisconsin v. Mitchell, 508 U.S. 476, 485 , 113 S.Ct. 2194 , 124 L.Ed.2d 436 (1993). | 4 | 2012–2021 |
Martin v. Martin
green
2 sentences2014Cherry at 353, 355 (“[T]he mere fact that a property division is unequal, does not, standing alone, amount to an abuse of discretion.”); Martin v. Martin, 18 Ohio St.3d 292, 294 , 480 N.E.2d 1112 (1985). 2014Cherry at 353, 355 (“[T]he mere fact that a property division is unequal, does not, standing alone, amount to an abuse of discretion.”); Martin v. Martin, 18 Ohio St.3d 292, 294 , 480 N.E.2d 1112 (1985). | 2 | 2013–2014 |
State v. Bezak
red
2 sentences2011Several years after being convicted of multiple felonies, Fischer moved for resentencing after the Ohio Supreme Court issued Bezak, 114 Ohio St.3d 94 , 868 N.E.2d 961 (holding that a sentence that omits a statutorily mandated postrelease-control term is void), arguing that the trial court had not properly advised him about postrelease control. 2011Several years after being convicted of multiple felonies, Fischer moved for resentencing after the Ohio Supreme Court issued Bezak, 114 Ohio St.3d 94 , 868 N.E.2d 961 (holding that a sentence that omits a statutorily mandated postrelease-control term is void), arguing that the trial court had not properly advised him about postrelease control. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Fischer
green
2 sentences2011Thus, the court had a wide variety of factors on which it based its decision. {¶ 15} As an aside, we also note that later the same year, after the court resentenced Cunigan, the Ohio Supreme Court decided the case of State v. Fischer, 128 Ohio St.3d 92 , 2010-Ohio-6238 , 942 N.E.2d 332 . 2011Thus, the court had a wide variety of factors on which it based its decision. {¶ 15} As an aside, we also note that later the same year, after the court resentenced Cunigan, the Ohio Supreme Court decided the case of State v. Fischer, 128 Ohio St.3d 92 , 2010-Ohio-6238 , 942 N.E.2d 332 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Nichols v. United States
green
1 sentence2007Specifically, the State has pointed to language in that opinion regarding the United States Supreme Court having upheld the constitutionality of laws that allowed the consideration of "a wide variety of factors" in sentencing a criminal defendant, including "past criminal behavior, even if no conviction resulted from that behavior." Nichols , 511 U.S. at 747 . {¶ 19} Nichols , however, is inapplicable to this case. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.