8 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Kimmellgreen2 sentences2005We do not consider that alleged violation because, as this court has stated before, “the Bar no longer should charge violations of ORS 9.527, at least in circumstances in which the acts allegedly constituting the statutory violation also would constitute the violation of a disciplinary rule.” In re Albrecht, 333 Or 520, 542 , 42 P3d 887 (2002) (declining to address alleged violation of ORS 9.527(4)); see also In re Kimmell, 332 Or 480, 487 , 31 P3d 414 (2001) (declining to address alleged violation of ORS 9.527(1)). 2005We do not consider that alleged violation because, as this court has stated before, “the Bar no longer should charge violations of ORS 9.527, at least in circumstances in which the acts allegedly constituting the statutory violation also would constitute the violation of a disciplinary rule.” In re Albrecht, 333 Or 520, 542 , 42 P3d 887 (2002) (declining to address alleged violation of ORS 9.527(4)); see also In re Kimmell, 332 Or 480, 487 , 31 P3d 414 (2001) (declining to address alleged violation of ORS 9.527(1)). | 1 | 3 |
Kidney Association of Oregon v. Fergusongreen1 sentence2001But, it is the breach of fiduciary duty owed to a client, rather than a violation of a disciplinary rule, that may result in a reduction or loss of a fee.” Id. at 144 (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Albrecht
green
2 sentences2005We do not consider that alleged violation because, as this court has stated before, “the Bar no longer should charge violations of ORS 9.527, at least in circumstances in which the acts allegedly constituting the statutory violation also would constitute the violation of a disciplinary rule.” In re Albrecht, 333 Or 520, 542 , 42 P3d 887 (2002) (declining to address alleged violation of ORS 9.527(4)); see also In re Kimmell, 332 Or 480, 487 , 31 P3d 414 (2001) (declining to address alleged violation of ORS 9.527(1)). 2005We do not consider that alleged violation because, as this court has stated before, “the Bar no longer should charge violations of ORS 9.527, at least in circumstances in which the acts allegedly constituting the statutory violation also would constitute the violation of a disciplinary rule.” In re Albrecht, 333 Or 520, 542 , 42 P3d 887 (2002) (declining to address alleged violation of ORS 9.527(4)); see also In re Kimmell, 332 Or 480, 487 , 31 P3d 414 (2001) (declining to address alleged violation of ORS 9.527(1)). | 2 | 2005–2021 |
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Strickland
green
2 sentences2021In re Strickland, 339 Or 595 , 602 n 7, 124 P3d 1225 (2005) (declining to address alleged violation of ORS 9.527); In re Albrecht, 333 Or 520, 542 , 42 P3d 887 (2002) (same); In re Kimmell, 332 Or 480, 487 , 31 P3d 414 (2001) (same). 20 In re Graeff engaged in criminal misconduct in violation of RPC 8.4(a)(2) but that he did not fail to communicate with his clients in violation of RPC 1.4. 2021In re Strickland, 339 Or 595 , 602 n 7, 124 P3d 1225 (2005) (declining to address alleged violation of ORS 9.527); In re Albrecht, 333 Or 520, 542 , 42 P3d 887 (2002) (same); In re Kimmell, 332 Or 480, 487 , 31 P3d 414 (2001) (same). 20 In re Graeff engaged in criminal misconduct in violation of RPC 8.4(a)(2) but that he did not fail to communicate with his clients in violation of RPC 1.4. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Banks
green
2 sentences2000In re Banks, 283 Or 459, 482 , 584 P2d 284 (1978). 2000In re Banks, 283 Or 459, 482 , 584 P2d 284 (1978). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Schaffner
green
2 sentences1997In re Schaffner, 323 Or 472, 477 , 918 P2d 803 (1996). 3 The clients in Schaffner I filed a complaint with the Bar in February 1994, and, between February and May 1994, the accused failed to respond to inquiries from the Bar and the LPRC assigned to investigate his case. 1997In re Schaffner, 323 Or 472, 477 , 918 P2d 803 (1996). 3 The clients in Schaffner I filed a complaint with the Bar in February 1994, and, between February and May 1994, the accused failed to respond to inquiries from the Bar and the LPRC assigned to investigate his case. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Chambers
green
2 sentences1985In re Chambers, 292 Or 670, 672 , 642 P2d 286 (1982). 1985In re Chambers, 292 Or 670, 672 , 642 P2d 286 (1982). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Brown v. Oregon State Bar
green
2 sentences1983Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded. 1 Although it might be argued that under Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 451-52 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982), the violation of a disciplinary rule is a matter that requires interpretation and enforcement by the Supreme Court in its supervisory and disciplinary capacity over the Bar, we believe the situation presented here is distinguishable from that presented in Brown . 1983Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded. 1 Although it might be argued that under Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 451-52 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982), the violation of a disciplinary rule is a matter that requires interpretation and enforcement by the Supreme Court in its supervisory and disciplinary capacity over the Bar, we believe the situation presented here is distinguishable from that presented in Brown . | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.