8 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 2015–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gray v. Buonopanegreen2 sentences2024Further, “[i]n the Rule’s requirement that the matter have been ‘resolved pursuant to a written settlement agreement or a court proceeding,’ the language assures that the pro se litigant is availed of a chance to address his claim subject to the contractual guarantee of a settlement agreement or to the procedural safeguards that attend a court proceeding.” Id. at 836 . 2023Rather, an action is “resolved” if the “pro se litigant is availed of a chance to address his claim subject to the contractual guarantee of a settlement agreement or to the procedural safeguards that attend a court proceeding.” Id. | 4 | 7 |
In Re Rcygreen1 sentence2015A conviction for fleeing or eluding a police officer is graded as a third-degree felony if the defendant “endangers a law enforcement officer or member of the general public due to the driver engaging in a high-speed chase.” 75 Pa.C.S. § 3733(a.2)(2)(iii); In re R.C.Y., 27 A.3d 227, 230 (Pa. Super. 2011). 2 In any event, the video of the incident, which is part of the record, demonstrates that Corporal Robbins activated his siren when pursuing Appellant. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||