global challenge (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

global challenge in Pennsylvania

8 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 2010–2026 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
Global Reinsurance Corp. v. Century Indemnity Co.green
ca2 · 2016 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
2 sentences

2017See Global Reinsurance Corp. of Am. v. Century Indemnity Co., 843 F.3d 120 (2d.

2017See Global Reinsurance Corp. of Am. v. Century Indemnity Co., 843 F.3d 120 (2d.

22
Germantown Cab Co. v. Philadelphia Parking Authoritygreen
pacommwct · 2011 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026
1 sentence

2026See Germantown, 27 A.3d at 293 n.7. 11 The records of each county board of elections, general and duplicate returns, tally papers, affidavits of voters and others, nomination petitions, certificates and papers, other petitions, appeals, witness lists, accounts, contracts, reports and other documents and records in its custody, except the contents of ballot boxes and voting machines and records of assisted voters, shall be open to public inspection, except as herein provided, and may be inspected and copied by any qualified elector of the county during ordinary business hours, at any time when

11
Commonwealth v. Groffgreen
pa · 1988 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
2 sentences

2018In Commonwealth v. Brooks, 7 A.3d 852 (Pa.Super. 2010), we stated: Case law has further “established that the Commonwealth must be afforded broad latitude when attempting to fix the date of offenses which involve a continuous course of criminal conduct.” Commonwealth v. G.D.M., Sr., 926 A.2d 984, 990 (Pa.Super.2007) (quoting Commonwealth v. Groff, 378 Pa.Super. 353 , 548 A.2d 1237, 1242 (1988)).

2018In Commonwealth v. Brooks, 7 A.3d 852 (Pa.Super. 2010), we stated: Case law has further “established that the Commonwealth must be afforded broad latitude when attempting to fix the date of offenses which involve a continuous course of criminal conduct.” Commonwealth v. G.D.M., Sr., 926 A.2d 984, 990 (Pa.Super.2007) (quoting Commonwealth v. Groff, 378 Pa.Super. 353 , 548 A.2d 1237, 1242 (1988)).

11
Commonwealth v. G.D.M.green
pasuperct · 2007 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
1 sentence

2018In Commonwealth v. Brooks, 7 A.3d 852 (Pa.Super. 2010), we stated: Case law has further “established that the Commonwealth must be afforded broad latitude when attempting to fix the date of offenses which involve a continuous course of criminal conduct.” Commonwealth v. G.D.M., Sr., 926 A.2d 984, 990 (Pa.Super.2007) (quoting Commonwealth v. Groff, 378 Pa.Super. 353 , 548 A.2d 1237, 1242 (1988)).

11
Commonwealth v. Spotzgreen
pa · 2011 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011The fact of delay in capital PCRA appeals, and the reasons for delay, have been made supremely relevant by the Defender litigation strategies I described in my concurrence in Commonwealth v. Spotz, 18 A.3d 244, 330 (Pa.2011) (Castille, C.J., joined by McCaffery, J., concurring), where I noted, among other points, that the Defender had filed a federal Motion in Commonwealth v. Dougherty, 585 CAP, forwarding a global claim that this Court was “incapable of managing its capital docket.” In addition to various factual misrepresentations, the Defender’s federal motion blamed the Pennsylvania courts

2011The fact of delay in capital PCRA appeals, and the reasons for delay, have been made supremely relevant by the Defender litigation strategies I described in my concurrence *354 in Commonwealth v. Spotz, 18 A.3d 244, 330 (Pa.2011) (Castille, C.J., joined by McCaffery, J., concurring), where I noted, among other points, that the Defender had filed a federal Motion in Commonwealth v. Dougherty, 585 CAP, forwarding a global claim that this Court was "incapable of managing its capital docket." In addition to various factual misrepresentations, the Defender's federal motion blamed the Pennsylvania c

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
In Re the Nomination Petition of Wagner green
pa · 1986
1 sentence

2024Permitting an eleventh-hour amendment at this juncture, based on facts previously known by Objectors, would effectively place the burden on Candidate to defend against a new global challenge, lodged “after the statutory period ha[s] run, [which] would render nugatory the protections afforded [to Candidate] by Section 977[ ] and defeat the interests sought to be furthered by that Section.” In re Wagner, 511 A.2d 754 , 756 (Pa. 1986) (citation omitted).

12024–2024
Commonwealth v. Brooks green
pasuperct · 2010
1 sentence

2018In Commonwealth v. Brooks, 7 A.3d 852 (Pa.Super. 2010), we stated: Case law has further “established that the Commonwealth must be afforded broad latitude when attempting to fix the date of offenses which involve a continuous course of criminal conduct.” Commonwealth v. G.D.M., Sr., 926 A.2d 984, 990 (Pa.Super.2007) (quoting Commonwealth v. Groff, 378 Pa.Super. 353 , 548 A.2d 1237, 1242 (1988)).

12018–2018
Commonwealth v. James green
pa · 2013
1 sentence

2015We disagree. -8- J-A04032-15 Contrary to Appellant’s assertion that any testimony is precluded where a challenge to a warrant is “global,” in James, our Supreme Court recognized the value of cross-examination as a safeguard to “test the truthfulness of the recitals of the warrant.” Id. at 187-88 .

12015–2015
Morrill v. Weaver green
paed · 2002
1 sentence

2010In support of his argument, appellant cited the decision in Morrill v. Weaver, 224 F.Supp.2d 882 (E.D.Pa.2002), which invalidated Section 2911(d) as unconstitutional to the extent it requires that nominating paper affiants in Pennsylvania must be residents of particular electoral districts, and permanently enjoined the Commonwealth from enforcing the provision.

12010–2010

Where else courts name it

TX 10 (1990–2025) PA 8 (2010–2026) CA 5 (2013–2026) NY 3 (1999–2021) NH 2 (2006–2018) NJ 2 (2004–2017) NM 2 (1994–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check