Ingram violation in Pennsylvania

8 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

Case	Followed	Cited
COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. Peckgreen pacommwct · 1990 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999 2 sentences 1999See Commonwealth, Dept. of Transportation v. Peck, 132 Pa.Cmwlth. 509 , 573 A.2d 645, 647 (1990). 1999See Commonwealth, Dept. of Transportation v. Peck, 132 Pa.Cmwlth. 509 , 573 A.2d 645, 647 (1990).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (14)

Case	Cited	Years
Commonwealth v. Ingram green pa · 1974 2 sentences 1982The Court also explained that the Ingram requirement is especially important where, as here, the defendant does not have “finite knowledge of the evidence available against him.” Said the Court: If the stated purpose for conducting a colloquy is to “demonstrate that deféndant’s action is taken voluntarily and intelligently,” Commonwealth v. Ingram, 455 Pa. at 200 , 316 A.2d at 78 , it must be assumed that some weighing of alternatives, • going to trial versus entering a plea, occurs. 1982The Court also explained that the Ingram requirement is especially important where, as here, the defendant does not have “finite knowledge of the evidence available against him.” Said the Court: If the stated purpose for conducting a colloquy is to “demonstrate that deféndant’s action is taken voluntarily and intelligently,” Commonwealth v. Ingram, 455 Pa. at 200 , 316 A.2d at 78 , it must be assumed that some weighing of alternatives, • going to trial versus entering a plea, occurs.	4	1976–1982
Bundy, K., Aplt v. Wetzel green pa · 2018 2 sentences 2019The Court expounded that “[if] (as asserted) that opportunity is substantially encumbered by the Department’s Act 84 deductions, an issue arises whether the George/Ingram rule should be extended to encompass such a circumstance.” Id. 2019The Court concluded that if, as asserted, Bundy’s ability to litigate his PCRA action was “substantially encumbered by the Department’s Act 84 deductions, an issue arises whether the George/Ingram rule should be extended to encompass such a circumstance.” Id.	2	2019–2019
Commonwealth v. Minor green pa · 1976 2 sentences 1978NOTES [] Although this Court has said that Commonwealth v. Ingram, 455 Pa. 198 , 316 A.2d 77 (1974) established no new law, see Commonwealth v. Minor, 467 Pa. 230 , 356 A.2d 346 (1976), nevertheless, since the date of Ingram , the Court has found it necessary on numerous occasions to rectify an Ingram violation. 1978NOTES [] Although this Court has said that Commonwealth v. Ingram, 455 Pa. 198 , 316 A.2d 77 (1974) established no new law, see Commonwealth v. Minor, 467 Pa. 230 , 356 A.2d 346 (1976), nevertheless, since the date of Ingram , the Court has found it necessary on numerous occasions to rectify an Ingram violation.	2	1978–1978
Commonwealth v. Schork green pa · 1976 2 sentences 1976The case is directed to be argued with Commonwealth v. Schork, 467 Pa. ___ , 356 A.2d 355 , and the parties are directed to brief and argue the following questions: (1) Is the standard for the adequacy of a plea colloquy to satisfy Pa.R.Crim.P. 319(a) articulated in Commonwealth v. Ingram, 455 Pa. 198 , 316 A.2d 77 (1974), applicable to cases not yet final on appeal in which the plea was entered prior to the decision in Ingram ? (2) If the standard articulated in Ingram is not applicable, did the colloquy in this case satisfy the requirements of Rule 319(a) under the appropriate pre- Ingram st 1976The case is directed to be argued with Commonwealth v. Schork, 467 Pa. —, 356 A.2d 355 , and the parties are directed to brief and argue the following questions: (1) Is the standard for the adequacy of a plea colloquy to satisfy Pa.R.Crim.P. 319(a) articulated in Commonwealth v. Ingram, 455 Pa. 198 , 316 A.2d 77 (1974), applicable to cases not yet final on appeal in which the plea was entered prior to the decision in Ingram? (2) If the standard articulated in Ingram is not applicable, did the colloquy in this case satisfy the requirements of Rule 319(a) under the appropriate pre-Ingram standar	2	1976–1978
Commonwealth v. Shaffer green pa · 1982 2 sentences 1984Id,., 498 Pa. at 353-54 , 446 A.2d at 597 . 1984Id,., 498 Pa. at 353-54 , 446 A.2d at 597 .	1	1984–1984
Commonwealth v. Jasper green pa · 1976 2 sentences 1978See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Kulp, supra ; Commonwealth v. Jasper, 472 Pa. 226 , 372 A.2d 395 (1976); Commonwealth v. Holmes, 468 Pa. 409 , 364 A.2d 259 (1976); Commonwealth v. Ramos, 468 Pa. 404 , 364 A.2d 257 (1976); Commonwealth v. Hunter, 468 Pa. 7 , 359 A.2d 785 (1976); Commonwealth v. Schork, 467 Pa. 248 , 356 A.2d 355 (1976); Commonwealth v. Minor, 467 Pa. 230 , 356 A.2d 346 (1976); Commonwealth v. Dilbeck, 466 Pa. 543 , 353 A.2d 824 (1976); Commonwealth v. Mack, 466 Pa. 12 , 351 A.2d 278 (1976); Commonwealth v. Sutton, 465 Pa. 335 , 350 A.2d 793 (1976). 1978See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Kulp, supra ; Commonwealth v. Jasper, 472 Pa. 226 , 372 A.2d 395 (1976); Commonwealth v. Holmes, 468 Pa. 409 , 364 A.2d 259 (1976); Commonwealth v. Ramos, 468 Pa. 404 , 364 A.2d 257 (1976); Commonwealth v. Hunter, 468 Pa. 7 , 359 A.2d 785 (1976); Commonwealth v. Schork, 467 Pa. 248 , 356 A.2d 355 (1976); Commonwealth v. Minor, 467 Pa. 230 , 356 A.2d 346 (1976); Commonwealth v. Dilbeck, 466 Pa. 543 , 353 A.2d 824 (1976); Commonwealth v. Mack, 466 Pa. 12 , 351 A.2d 278 (1976); Commonwealth v. Sutton, 465 Pa. 335 , 350 A.2d 793 (1976).	1	1978–1978
Commonwealth v. Sutton green pa · 1976 2 sentences 1978See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Kulp, supra ; Commonwealth v. Jasper, 472 Pa. 226 , 372 A.2d 395 (1976); Commonwealth v. Holmes, 468 Pa. 409 , 364 A.2d 259 (1976); Commonwealth v. Ramos, 468 Pa. 404 , 364 A.2d 257 (1976); Commonwealth v. Hunter, 468 Pa. 7 , 359 A.2d 785 (1976); Commonwealth v. Schork, 467 Pa. 248 , 356 A.2d 355 (1976); Commonwealth v. Minor, 467 Pa. 230 , 356 A.2d 346 (1976); Commonwealth v. Dilbeck, 466 Pa. 543 , 353 A.2d 824 (1976); Commonwealth v. Mack, 466 Pa. 12 , 351 A.2d 278 (1976); Commonwealth v. Sutton, 465 Pa. 335 , 350 A.2d 793 (1976). 1978See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Kulp, supra ; Commonwealth v. Jasper, 472 Pa. 226 , 372 A.2d 395 (1976); Commonwealth v. Holmes, 468 Pa. 409 , 364 A.2d 259 (1976); Commonwealth v. Ramos, 468 Pa. 404 , 364 A.2d 257 (1976); Commonwealth v. Hunter, 468 Pa. 7 , 359 A.2d 785 (1976); Commonwealth v. Schork, 467 Pa. 248 , 356 A.2d 355 (1976); Commonwealth v. Minor, 467 Pa. 230 , 356 A.2d 346 (1976); Commonwealth v. Dilbeck, 466 Pa. 543 , 353 A.2d 824 (1976); Commonwealth v. Mack, 466 Pa. 12 , 351 A.2d 278 (1976); Commonwealth v. Sutton, 465 Pa. 335 , 350 A.2d 793 (1976).	1	1978–1978
Commonwealth v. Knudsen green pa · 1971 2 sentences 1978The trial court’s order permitting the Commonwealth to cross-examine its own witness is not challenged, but see Commonwealth v. Knudsen, 443 Pa. 412 , 278 A.2d 881 (1971). 4 . 1978The trial court’s order permitting the Commonwealth to cross-examine its own witness is not challenged, but see Commonwealth v. Knudsen, 443 Pa. 412 , 278 A.2d 881 (1971). 4 .	1	1978–1978
Commonwealth v. Ramos neutral pa · 1976 2 sentences 1978See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Kulp, supra ; Commonwealth v. Jasper, 472 Pa. 226 , 372 A.2d 395 (1976); Commonwealth v. Holmes, 468 Pa. 409 , 364 A.2d 259 (1976); Commonwealth v. Ramos, 468 Pa. 404 , 364 A.2d 257 (1976); Commonwealth v. Hunter, 468 Pa. 7 , 359 A.2d 785 (1976); Commonwealth v. Schork, 467 Pa. 248 , 356 A.2d 355 (1976); Commonwealth v. Minor, 467 Pa. 230 , 356 A.2d 346 (1976); Commonwealth v. Dilbeck, 466 Pa. 543 , 353 A.2d 824 (1976); Commonwealth v. Mack, 466 Pa. 12 , 351 A.2d 278 (1976); Commonwealth v. Sutton, 465 Pa. 335 , 350 A.2d 793 (1976). 1978See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Kulp, supra ; Commonwealth v. Jasper, 472 Pa. 226 , 372 A.2d 395 (1976); Commonwealth v. Holmes, 468 Pa. 409 , 364 A.2d 259 (1976); Commonwealth v. Ramos, 468 Pa. 404 , 364 A.2d 257 (1976); Commonwealth v. Hunter, 468 Pa. 7 , 359 A.2d 785 (1976); Commonwealth v. Schork, 467 Pa. 248 , 356 A.2d 355 (1976); Commonwealth v. Minor, 467 Pa. 230 , 356 A.2d 346 (1976); Commonwealth v. Dilbeck, 466 Pa. 543 , 353 A.2d 824 (1976); Commonwealth v. Mack, 466 Pa. 12 , 351 A.2d 278 (1976); Commonwealth v. Sutton, 465 Pa. 335 , 350 A.2d 793 (1976).	1	1978–1978
Commonwealth v. Holmes green pa · 1976 2 sentences 1978See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Kulp, supra ; Commonwealth v. Jasper, 472 Pa. 226 , 372 A.2d 395 (1976); Commonwealth v. Holmes, 468 Pa. 409 , 364 A.2d 259 (1976); Commonwealth v. Ramos, 468 Pa. 404 , 364 A.2d 257 (1976); Commonwealth v. Hunter, 468 Pa. 7 , 359 A.2d 785 (1976); Commonwealth v. Schork, 467 Pa. 248 , 356 A.2d 355 (1976); Commonwealth v. Minor, 467 Pa. 230 , 356 A.2d 346 (1976); Commonwealth v. Dilbeck, 466 Pa. 543 , 353 A.2d 824 (1976); Commonwealth v. Mack, 466 Pa. 12 , 351 A.2d 278 (1976); Commonwealth v. Sutton, 465 Pa. 335 , 350 A.2d 793 (1976). 1978See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Kulp, supra ; Commonwealth v. Jasper, 472 Pa. 226 , 372 A.2d 395 (1976); Commonwealth v. Holmes, 468 Pa. 409 , 364 A.2d 259 (1976); Commonwealth v. Ramos, 468 Pa. 404 , 364 A.2d 257 (1976); Commonwealth v. Hunter, 468 Pa. 7 , 359 A.2d 785 (1976); Commonwealth v. Schork, 467 Pa. 248 , 356 A.2d 355 (1976); Commonwealth v. Minor, 467 Pa. 230 , 356 A.2d 346 (1976); Commonwealth v. Dilbeck, 466 Pa. 543 , 353 A.2d 824 (1976); Commonwealth v. Mack, 466 Pa. 12 , 351 A.2d 278 (1976); Commonwealth v. Sutton, 465 Pa. 335 , 350 A.2d 793 (1976).	1	1978–1978
Commonwealth v. Hunter green pa · 1976 2 sentences 1978See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Kulp, supra ; Commonwealth v. Jasper, 472 Pa. 226 , 372 A.2d 395 (1976); Commonwealth v. Holmes, 468 Pa. 409 , 364 A.2d 259 (1976); Commonwealth v. Ramos, 468 Pa. 404 , 364 A.2d 257 (1976); Commonwealth v. Hunter, 468 Pa. 7 , 359 A.2d 785 (1976); Commonwealth v. Schork, 467 Pa. 248 , 356 A.2d 355 (1976); Commonwealth v. Minor, 467 Pa. 230 , 356 A.2d 346 (1976); Commonwealth v. Dilbeck, 466 Pa. 543 , 353 A.2d 824 (1976); Commonwealth v. Mack, 466 Pa. 12 , 351 A.2d 278 (1976); Commonwealth v. Sutton, 465 Pa. 335 , 350 A.2d 793 (1976). 1978See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Kulp, supra ; Commonwealth v. Jasper, 472 Pa. 226 , 372 A.2d 395 (1976); Commonwealth v. Holmes, 468 Pa. 409 , 364 A.2d 259 (1976); Commonwealth v. Ramos, 468 Pa. 404 , 364 A.2d 257 (1976); Commonwealth v. Hunter, 468 Pa. 7 , 359 A.2d 785 (1976); Commonwealth v. Schork, 467 Pa. 248 , 356 A.2d 355 (1976); Commonwealth v. Minor, 467 Pa. 230 , 356 A.2d 346 (1976); Commonwealth v. Dilbeck, 466 Pa. 543 , 353 A.2d 824 (1976); Commonwealth v. Mack, 466 Pa. 12 , 351 A.2d 278 (1976); Commonwealth v. Sutton, 465 Pa. 335 , 350 A.2d 793 (1976).	1	1978–1978
Commonwealth v. MacK green pa · 1976 2 sentences 1978See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Kulp, supra ; Commonwealth v. Jasper, 472 Pa. 226 , 372 A.2d 395 (1976); Commonwealth v. Holmes, 468 Pa. 409 , 364 A.2d 259 (1976); Commonwealth v. Ramos, 468 Pa. 404 , 364 A.2d 257 (1976); Commonwealth v. Hunter, 468 Pa. 7 , 359 A.2d 785 (1976); Commonwealth v. Schork, 467 Pa. 248 , 356 A.2d 355 (1976); Commonwealth v. Minor, 467 Pa. 230 , 356 A.2d 346 (1976); Commonwealth v. Dilbeck, 466 Pa. 543 , 353 A.2d 824 (1976); Commonwealth v. Mack, 466 Pa. 12 , 351 A.2d 278 (1976); Commonwealth v. Sutton, 465 Pa. 335 , 350 A.2d 793 (1976). 1978See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Kulp, supra ; Commonwealth v. Jasper, 472 Pa. 226 , 372 A.2d 395 (1976); Commonwealth v. Holmes, 468 Pa. 409 , 364 A.2d 259 (1976); Commonwealth v. Ramos, 468 Pa. 404 , 364 A.2d 257 (1976); Commonwealth v. Hunter, 468 Pa. 7 , 359 A.2d 785 (1976); Commonwealth v. Schork, 467 Pa. 248 , 356 A.2d 355 (1976); Commonwealth v. Minor, 467 Pa. 230 , 356 A.2d 346 (1976); Commonwealth v. Dilbeck, 466 Pa. 543 , 353 A.2d 824 (1976); Commonwealth v. Mack, 466 Pa. 12 , 351 A.2d 278 (1976); Commonwealth v. Sutton, 465 Pa. 335 , 350 A.2d 793 (1976).	1	1978–1978
Commonwealth v. Dilbeck green pa · 1976 2 sentences 1978See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Kulp, supra ; Commonwealth v. Jasper, 472 Pa. 226 , 372 A.2d 395 (1976); Commonwealth v. Holmes, 468 Pa. 409 , 364 A.2d 259 (1976); Commonwealth v. Ramos, 468 Pa. 404 , 364 A.2d 257 (1976); Commonwealth v. Hunter, 468 Pa. 7 , 359 A.2d 785 (1976); Commonwealth v. Schork, 467 Pa. 248 , 356 A.2d 355 (1976); Commonwealth v. Minor, 467 Pa. 230 , 356 A.2d 346 (1976); Commonwealth v. Dilbeck, 466 Pa. 543 , 353 A.2d 824 (1976); Commonwealth v. Mack, 466 Pa. 12 , 351 A.2d 278 (1976); Commonwealth v. Sutton, 465 Pa. 335 , 350 A.2d 793 (1976). 1978See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Kulp, supra ; Commonwealth v. Jasper, 472 Pa. 226 , 372 A.2d 395 (1976); Commonwealth v. Holmes, 468 Pa. 409 , 364 A.2d 259 (1976); Commonwealth v. Ramos, 468 Pa. 404 , 364 A.2d 257 (1976); Commonwealth v. Hunter, 468 Pa. 7 , 359 A.2d 785 (1976); Commonwealth v. Schork, 467 Pa. 248 , 356 A.2d 355 (1976); Commonwealth v. Minor, 467 Pa. 230 , 356 A.2d 346 (1976); Commonwealth v. Dilbeck, 466 Pa. 543 , 353 A.2d 824 (1976); Commonwealth v. Mack, 466 Pa. 12 , 351 A.2d 278 (1976); Commonwealth v. Sutton, 465 Pa. 335 , 350 A.2d 793 (1976).	1	1978–1978
Boykin v. Alabama green scotus · 1969 2 sentences 1976The reason, I submit, is that Ingram indeed wrought a change in the law governing the validity of guilty pleas. [4] In support of the view that Ingram announced no new law, the Court also relies upon the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969). 1976The reason, I submit, is that Ingram indeed wrought a change in the law governing the validity of guilty pleas. [4] In support of the view that Ingram announced no new law, the Court also relies upon the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969).	1	1976–1976

Where else courts name it

PA 8 (1976–2019) GA 8 (1975–2025) TX 5 (2000–2014) AL 4 (2003–2012) NY 3 (1991–2023) VA 2 (1993–2021) IN 2 (2015–2018) KS 2 (2005–2020) LA 2 (1998–2010) CA 2 (1987–2025) IL 2 (2015–2015)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check