8 Pennsylvania opinions name it 1 courts 2016–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Hunzergreen2 sentences2023Additionally, the on-the-record disclosure requirement does not require the trial court to make “a detailed, highly technical statement.” Commonwealth v. Hunzer, 868 A.2d 498, 514 (Pa. Super. 2005) (citation omitted). 2019Chapman’s complaint does not merit relief. -4- J-S13017-19 The on-the-record disclosure requirement does not require the trial court to make “a detailed, highly technical statement.” Commonwealth v. Hunzer, 868 A.2d 498, 514 (Pa. Super. 2005) (citation omitted), appeal denied, 880 A.2d 1237 (Pa. 2005). | 8 | 8 |
Commonwealth v. Venturagreen2 sentences2019Where the trial court has the benefit of a Pre-Sentence Investigation Report (PSI), our Supreme Court has held that “it is presumed that the court is aware of all appropriate sentencing factors and considerations, and that where the court has been so informed, its discretion should not be disturbed.” Commonwealth v. Ventura, 975 A.2d 1128, 1135 (Pa. Super. 2009) (citation omitted), appeal denied, 987 A.2d 161 (Pa. 2009). 2018Where the trial court has the benefit of a Pre-Sentence Investigation Report (PSI), our Supreme Court has held that “it is presumed that the court is aware of all appropriate sentencing factors and considerations, and that where the court has been so informed, -3- J-A11045-18 its discretion should not be disturbed.” Commonwealth v. Ventura, 975 A.2d 1128, 1135 (Pa. Super. 2009) (discussing Commonwealth v. Devers, 546 A.2d 12 , 18–19 (Pa. 1988)). | 5 | 6 |
Commonwealth v. Deversgreen2 sentences2018Where the trial court has the benefit of a Pre-Sentence Investigation Report (PSI), our Supreme Court has held that “it is presumed that the court is aware of all appropriate sentencing factors and considerations, and that where the court has been so informed, -3- J-A11045-18 its discretion should not be disturbed.” Commonwealth v. Ventura, 975 A.2d 1128, 1135 (Pa. Super. 2009) (discussing Commonwealth v. Devers, 546 A.2d 12 , 18–19 (Pa. 1988)). 2017Where the trial court has the benefit of a PSI Report, our Supreme Court has held that “it is presumed that the court is aware of all appropriate sentencing factors and considerations, and that where the court has been so informed, its discretion should not be disturbed.” Commonwealth v. Ventura, 975 A.2d 1128 , -8- J-S49008-17 1135 (Pa. Super. 2009) (discussing Commonwealth v. Devers, 546 A.2d 12, 18-19 (Pa. 1988)). | 4 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Com. v. HONESTY
green
2 sentences2019The on-the-record disclosure requirement does not require the trial court to make “a detailed, highly technical statement.” Commonwealth v. Hunzer, 868 A.2d 498, 514 (Pa. Super. 2005) (citation omitted), appeal denied, 880 A.2d 1237 (Pa. 2005). 2019Chapman’s complaint does not merit relief. -4- J-S13017-19 The on-the-record disclosure requirement does not require the trial court to make “a detailed, highly technical statement.” Commonwealth v. Hunzer, 868 A.2d 498, 514 (Pa. Super. 2005) (citation omitted), appeal denied, 880 A.2d 1237 (Pa. 2005). | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Lott v. Lott
green
1 sentence2019Where the trial court has the benefit of a Pre-Sentence Investigation Report (PSI), our Supreme Court has held that “it is presumed that the court is aware of all appropriate sentencing factors and considerations, and that where the court has been so informed, its discretion should not be disturbed.” Commonwealth v. Ventura, 975 A.2d 1128, 1135 (Pa. Super. 2009) (citation omitted), appeal denied, 987 A.2d 161 (Pa. 2009). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Commonwealth v. Bowen
green
1 sentence2016Id. (brackets and citation omitted). -8- J.S41028/16 The on-the-record disclosure requirement does not require the trial court to make “a detailed, highly technical statement.” Commonwealth v. Hunter, 868 A.2d 498, 514 (Pa. Super. 2005). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.