will correct any error in South Carolina

8 South Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 1994–2021 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

Case	Followed	Cited
Sea Cabins on the Ocean IV Homeowners Ass'n v. City of North Myrtle Beachgreen scctapp · 1999 · cited in 2 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2008–2019 2 sentences 2019In an action at law decided by a master, “this Court will correct any error of law.” Sea Cabins on the Ocean IV Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. City of North Myrtle Beach, 337 S.C. 380, 388 , 523 S.E.2d 193, 197 (Ct. App.1999). 2019In an action at law decided by a master, “this Court will correct any error of law.” Sea Cabins on the Ocean IV Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. City of North Myrtle Beach, 337 S.C. 380, 388 , 523 S.E.2d 193, 197 (Ct. App.1999).	2	2
Murray, v. Holnam, Inc. and Thomas Thornton, of Whom Holnam, Inc. Isgreen scctapp · 2001 · cited in 1 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 2 sentences 2015As to Issue 5: Mellen v. Lane, 377 S.C. 261, 275 , 659 S.E.2d 236, 244 (Ct. App. 2008) (explaining an action in tort for damages is an action at law, and in an action at law decided by a special referee, this court will correct any error of law); id. (stating in reviewing an action at law, this court "must affirm the [referee's] factual findings unless there is no evidence reasonably supporting them"); Murray v. Holnam, Inc., 344 S.C. 129, 140-41 , 542 S.E.2d 743, 749 (Ct. App. 2001) ("A communication made in good faith on any subject matter in which the person communicating has an interest or 2015As to Issue 5: Mellen v. Lane, 377 S.C. 261, 275 , 659 S.E.2d 236, 244 (Ct. App. 2008) (explaining an action in tort for damages is an action at law, and in an action at law decided by a special referee, this court will correct any error of law); id. (stating in reviewing an action at law, this court "must affirm the [referee's] factual findings unless there is no evidence reasonably supporting them"); Murray v. Holnam, Inc., 344 S.C. 129, 140-41 , 542 S.E.2d 743, 749 (Ct. App. 2001) ("A communication made in good faith on any subject matter in which the person communicating has an interest or	1	1
Snavely v. AMISUB of South Carolina, Inc.green scctapp · 2008 · cited in 1 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 2 sentences 2015As to Issue 5: Mellen v. Lane, 377 S.C. 261, 275 , 659 S.E.2d 236, 244 (Ct. App. 2008) (explaining an action in tort for damages is an action at law, and in an action at law decided by a special referee, this court will correct any error of law); id. (stating in reviewing an action at law, this court "must affirm the [referee's] factual findings unless there is no evidence reasonably supporting them"); Murray v. Holnam, Inc., 344 S.C. 129, 140-41 , 542 S.E.2d 743, 749 (Ct. App. 2001) ("A communication made in good faith on any subject matter in which the person communicating has an interest or 2015As to Issue 5: Mellen v. Lane, 377 S.C. 261, 275 , 659 S.E.2d 236, 244 (Ct. App. 2008) (explaining an action in tort for damages is an action at law, and in an action at law decided by a special referee, this court will correct any error of law); id. (stating in reviewing an action at law, this court "must affirm the [referee's] factual findings unless there is no evidence reasonably supporting them"); Murray v. Holnam, Inc., 344 S.C. 129, 140-41 , 542 S.E.2d 743, 749 (Ct. App. 2001) ("A communication made in good faith on any subject matter in which the person communicating has an interest or	1	1
Mellen v. Lanegreen scctapp · 2008 · cited in 1 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 2 sentences 2015As to Issue 5: Mellen v. Lane, 377 S.C. 261, 275 , 659 S.E.2d 236, 244 (Ct. App. 2008) (explaining an action in tort for damages is an action at law, and in an action at law decided by a special referee, this court will correct any error of law); id. (stating in reviewing an action at law, this court "must affirm the [referee's] factual findings unless there is no evidence reasonably supporting them"); Murray v. Holnam, Inc., 344 S.C. 129, 140-41 , 542 S.E.2d 743, 749 (Ct. App. 2001) ("A communication made in good faith on any subject matter in which the person communicating has an interest or 2015As to Issue 5: Mellen v. Lane, 377 S.C. 261, 275 , 659 S.E.2d 236, 244 (Ct. App. 2008) (explaining an action in tort for damages is an action at law, and in an action at law decided by a special referee, this court will correct any error of law); id. (stating in reviewing an action at law, this court "must affirm the [referee's] factual findings unless there is no evidence reasonably supporting them"); Murray v. Holnam, Inc., 344 S.C. 129, 140-41 , 542 S.E.2d 743, 749 (Ct. App. 2001) ("A communication made in good faith on any subject matter in which the person communicating has an interest or	1	1
Twelfth RMA Partners, L.P. v. National Safe Corp.green scctapp · 1999 · cited in 1 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008 2 sentences 2008“We must affirm the Master’s factual findings unless there is no evidence reasonably supporting them.” Id.; Twelfth RMA Partners, L.P. v. Nat’l Safe Corp., 335 S.C. 635, 639 , 518 S.E.2d 44, 46 (Ct.App.1999). 2008“We must affirm the Master’s factual findings unless there is no evidence reasonably supporting them.” Id.; Twelfth RMA Partners, L.P. v. Nat’l Safe Corp., 335 S.C. 635, 639 , 518 S.E.2d 44, 46 (Ct.App.1999).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

Case	Cited	Years
Jefferies v. Phillips green scctapp · 1994 2 sentences 2021"Therefore, this court will correct any error of law, but we must affirm the master's factual findings unless there is no evidence that reasonably supports those findings." Id. at 527 , 451 S.E.2d at 22–23. 2021"Therefore, this court will correct any error of law, but we must affirm the master's factual findings unless there is no evidence that reasonably supports those findings." Id. at 527 , 451 S.E.2d at 22–23.	3	1997–2021
Cobb v. Benjamin green scctapp · 1997 2 sentences 1998Cobb v. Benjamin, 325 S.C. 573 , 482 S.E.2d 589 (Ct.App.1997). 1998Cobb v. Benjamin, 325 S.C. 573 , 482 S.E.2d 589 (Ct.App.1997).	1	1998–1998
Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of Greenville green sc · 1976 2 sentences 1994Townes Assocs. v. City of Greenville, 266 S.C. 81 , 221 S.E. (2d) 773 (1976). 1994Townes Assocs. v. City of Greenville, 266 S.C. 81 , 221 S.E. (2d) 773 (1976).	1	1994–1994

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check