8 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2016–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. O'Haragreen2 sentences2018RAP 2.5(a)(3). "[The appellant must 'identify a constitutional error and show how the alleged error actually affected the [appellant]'s rights at trial." State v. O'Hara, 167 Wn.2d 91, 98 , 217 P.3d 756 (2009)(second alteration in original)(quoting State v. Kirkman, 159 Wn.2d 918, 926-27 , 155 P.3d 125 (2007)). 2018RAP 2.5(a)(3). "[T]he appellant must 'identify a constitutional error and show how the alleged error actually affected the [appellant's] rights at trial." O'Hara, 167 Wn.2d at 98 (second alteration in original)(quoting State v. Kirkman, 159 Wn.2d 918, 926-27 , 155 P.3d 125 (2007)). | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Kirkman
green
2 sentences2018RAP 2.5(a)(3). "[The appellant must 'identify a constitutional error and show how the alleged error actually affected the [appellant]'s rights at trial." State v. O'Hara, 167 Wn.2d 91, 98 , 217 P.3d 756 (2009)(second alteration in original)(quoting State v. Kirkman, 159 Wn.2d 918, 926-27 , 155 P.3d 125 (2007)). 2018RAP 2.5(a)(3). "[T]he appellant must 'identify a constitutional error and show how the alleged error actually affected the [appellant's] rights at trial." O'Hara, 167 Wn.2d at 98 (second alteration in original)(quoting State v. Kirkman, 159 Wn.2d 918, 926-27 , 155 P.3d 125 (2007)). | 3 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Kirkman
green
2 sentences2018RAP 2.5(a)(3). "[The appellant must 'identify a constitutional error and show how the alleged error actually affected the [appellant]'s rights at trial." State v. O'Hara, 167 Wn.2d 91, 98 , 217 P.3d 756 (2009)(second alteration in original)(quoting State v. Kirkman, 159 Wn.2d 918, 926-27 , 155 P.3d 125 (2007)). 2018RAP 2.5(a)(3). "[T]he appellant must 'identify a constitutional error and show how the alleged error actually affected the [appellant's] rights at trial." O'Hara, 167 Wn.2d at 98 (second alteration in original)(quoting State v. Kirkman, 159 Wn.2d 918, 926-27 , 155 P.3d 125 (2007)). | 3 | 2018–2018 |
In Re Detention of Brown
neutral
2 sentences2016App. 116, 121 , 225 P.3d 1028 (2010). 2016App. 116, 121 , 225 P.3d 1028 (2010). | 3 | 2016–2016 |
In re the Detention of Brown
neutral
2 sentences2016“Accordingly, an appellant may raise an error for the first time on appeal if he or she demonstrates (1) that the error is manifest and (2) that the error is truly of constitutional dimension.” In re Det. of Brown, 154 Wn. 2016“Accordingly, an appellant may raise an error for the first time on appeal if he or she demonstrates (1) that the error is manifest and (2) that the error is truly of constitutional dimension.” In re Det. of Brown, 154 Wn. | 3 | 2016–2016 |
State v. O'HARA
green
2 sentences2018RAP 2.5(a)(3). "[The appellant must 'identify a constitutional error and show how the alleged error actually affected the [appellant]'s rights at trial." State v. O'Hara, 167 Wn.2d 91, 98 , 217 P.3d 756 (2009)(second alteration in original)(quoting State v. Kirkman, 159 Wn.2d 918, 926-27 , 155 P.3d 125 (2007)). 2018RAP 2.5(a)(3). "[T]he appellant must 'identify a constitutional error and show how the alleged error actually affected the [appellant]'s rights at trial." State v. O'Hara, 167 Wn.2d 91, 98 , 217 P.3d 756 (2009)(second alteration in original) (quoting State v. Kirkman, 159 Wn.2d 918, 926-27 , 155 P.3d 125 (2007)). | 2 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Grott
green
1 sentence2021Grott, 195 Wn.2d at 267 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Scott
green
2 sentences2020State v. WWJ Corp., 138 Wn.2d 595, 602 , 980 P.2d 1257 (1999); State v. Scott, 110 Wn.2d 682, 688 , 757 P.2d 492 (1988). 2020State v. WWJ Corp., 138 Wn.2d 595, 602 , 980 P.2d 1257 (1999); State v. Scott, 110 Wn.2d 682, 688 , 757 P.2d 492 (1988). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. WWJ Corp.
green
1 sentence2020State v. WWJ Corp., 138 Wn.2d 595, 602 , 980 P.2d 1257 (1999); State v. Scott, 110 Wn.2d 682, 688 , 757 P.2d 492 (1988). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. WWJ Corp.
green
1 sentence2020State v. WWJ Corp., 138 Wn.2d 595, 602 , 980 P.2d 1257 (1999); State v. Scott, 110 Wn.2d 682, 688 , 757 P.2d 492 (1988). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Warren
green
1 sentence2018"The rights to marriage and to the care, custody, and companionship of one's children are fundamental constitutional rights." State v. Warren, 165 Wn.2d 17, 34 ; 195 P.3d 940 (2008). 8 No. 76456-0-1/ 9 An appellant may raise a claim of "manifest error affecting a constitutional right" for the first time on appeal. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Warren
green
1 sentence2018"The rights to marriage and to the care, custody, and companionship of one's children are fundamental constitutional rights." State v. Warren, 165 Wn.2d 17, 34 ; 195 P.3d 940 (2008). 8 No. 76456-0-1/ 9 An appellant may raise a claim of "manifest error affecting a constitutional right" for the first time on appeal. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.