factual determination hearing in Washington

8 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

Case	Followed	Cited
In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Longacregreen wash · 2005 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 2 sentences 2010An attorney's mental state "is a factual determination and the hearing officer's finding is given great weight." Longacre, 155 Wash.2d at 744, 122 P.3d 710 . "[S]ometimes there is a fine line between negligence and knowledge." In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Stansfield, 164 Wash.2d 108, 127 , 187 P.3d 254 (2008). 2010An attorney’s mental state “is a factual determination and the hearing officer’s finding is given great weight.” Longacre, 155 Wn.2d at 744. “[Sometimes there is a fine line between negligence and knowledge.” In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Stansfield, 164 Wn.2d 108, 127 , 187 P.3d 254 (2008).	2	2
In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Anschellgreen wash · 2003 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 2 sentences 2005Anschell, 149 Wn.2d at 501 (“We decline ... to make the initial determination of the applicable mental state and the extent of harm in connection with each of the violations. 2005Anschell, 149 Wash.2d at 501 , 69 P.3d 844 ("We decline ... to make the initial determination of the applicable mental state and the extent of harm in connection with each of the violations.	1	2

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

Case	Cited	Years
In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Stansfield green wash · 2008 2 sentences 2010An attorney's mental state "is a factual determination and the hearing officer's finding is given great weight." Longacre, 155 Wash.2d at 744, 122 P.3d 710 . "[S]ometimes there is a fine line between negligence and knowledge." In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Stansfield, 164 Wash.2d 108, 127 , 187 P.3d 254 (2008). 2010An attorney’s mental state “is a factual determination and the hearing officer’s finding is given great weight.” Longacre, 155 Wn.2d at 744. “[Sometimes there is a fine line between negligence and knowledge.” In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Stansfield, 164 Wn.2d 108, 127 , 187 P.3d 254 (2008).	2	2010–2010
In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Stansfield green wash · 2008 2 sentences 2010An attorney's mental state "is a factual determination and the hearing officer's finding is given great weight." Longacre, 155 Wash.2d at 744, 122 P.3d 710 . "[S]ometimes there is a fine line between negligence and knowledge." In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Stansfield, 164 Wash.2d 108, 127 , 187 P.3d 254 (2008). 2010An attorney’s mental state “is a factual determination and the hearing officer’s finding is given great weight.” Longacre, 155 Wn.2d at 744. “[Sometimes there is a fine line between negligence and knowledge.” In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Stansfield, 164 Wn.2d 108, 127 , 187 P.3d 254 (2008).	2	2010–2010
Morrissey v. Brewer green scotus · 1972 2 sentences 1990Gagnon, 411 U.S. at 782 ; Morrissey, 408 U.S. at 479-80 ; State v. Carlson, 27 Wn. 1980Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 , 33 L.	2	1980–1990
Gagnon v. Scarpelli red scotus · 1973 2 sentences 1990Gagnon, 411 U.S. at 782 ; Morrissey, 408 U.S. at 479-80 ; State v. Carlson, 27 Wn. 1980Ed. 2d 656 , 93 S. Ct. 1756 (1973); (c) The hearing in revocation of parole is a 2-step proceeding which includes a factual determination of a violation and a determination of appropriate sanctions in the event a violation is established.	2	1980–1990
City of Seattle v. Lea neutral washctapp · 1990 2 sentences 2024“Probation revocation is a [two]-step process which includes a factual determination of a violation and a determination of appropriate sanctions in the event a violation is established.” City of Seattle v. Lea, 56 Wn. 2024App. 859, 861 , 786 P.2d 798 (1990).	1	2024–2024
In Re Disciplinary Proc. Against Longacre green wash · 2005 1 sentence 2010An attorney's mental state "is a factual determination and the hearing officer's finding is given great weight." Longacre, 155 Wash.2d at 744, 122 P.3d 710 . "[S]ometimes there is a fine line between negligence and knowledge." In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Stansfield, 164 Wash.2d 108, 127 , 187 P.3d 254 (2008).	1	2010–2010
Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Anschell green wash · 2003 1 sentence 2005Anschell, 149 Wash.2d at 501 , 69 P.3d 844 ("We decline ... to make the initial determination of the applicable mental state and the extent of harm in connection with each of the violations.	1	2005–2005
State v. Carlson neutral washctapp · 1980 1 sentence 1990Gagnon, 411 U.S. at 782 ; Morrissey, 408 U.S. at 479-80 ; State v. Carlson, 27 Wn.	1	1990–1990
State v. Loux green washctapp · 1979 1 sentence 1981App. 545, 548 , 604 P.2d 177 (1979). [3] Alternatively, Bugai proposes that the case be remanded for a factual determination of defense counsel's incompetence.	1	1981–1981

Where else courts name it

IN 139 (1998–2026) WA 8 (1980–2024) LA 7 (1973–2004) NY 3 (1973–1990) CA 2 (1960–2021) MA 2 (2006–2023) IL 2 (2015–2015) WI 2 (1980–1985)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check